Jump to content

Why Arvind Kejriwal Makes More Sense Than Narendra Modi


Recommended Posts

Posted

 

modi is a politician .kejariwal is a reformer.

 

 

reformers don't enter electoral politics.

Posted

I thought you were questioning Modi..

 

I agree that Congress is the villian.. Why target Modi then?

 

I am not targeting anybody and there is no use accusing Mafia Gandhi and her Amul Gandhi. Modi is projecting as most likely PM in 2014.

 

He reacts on all issues through social media and he tweets very regularly on n number of issues including Article 377. Why can't he ask his party to correct their stand on article 3 which powers the center to play footballl with any state? Or is evading this issue for electoral gains?

Posted

I am not targeting anybody and there is no use accusing Mafia Gandhi and her Amul Gandhi. Modi is projecting as most likely PM in 2014.

 

He reacts on all issues through social media and he tweets very regularly on n number of issues including Article 377. Why can't he ask his party to correct their stand on article 3 which powers the center to play footballl with any state? Or is evading this issue for electoral gains?

 

Its a very hard issue to comment on, kada.. 

 

but when he handles it, if he becomes PM.. He'll be responsible for all the shyte that his actions will throw up.

 

all his information on this issue is second hand, and its understandable that he doesn't want to commit hiimself one way or the other..

 

All politicians main aim is to get into power (including Kejri).. what they do there is what defines them.. not how they got there.

Posted

Its a very hard issue to comment on, kada.. 

 

but when he handles it, if he becomes PM.. He'll be responsible for all the shyte that his actions will throw up.

 

all his information on this issue is second hand, and its understandable that he doesn't want to commit hiimself one way or the other..

 

All politicians main aim is to get into power (including Kejri).. what they do there is what defines them.. not how they got there.

You are still missing my point.

 

In 2009 AP polls, there was majorly Cong vs Grand Alliance w/TRS. On Telangana issue Cong favored to institute a committee and while Alliance key partner said the first sign of their govt will be on separate TG bill. So the voters choose between the two based on their opinions. Likewise every party including BJP spell their stands on various issues like Ram Mandir, Article 377, Linking of Rivers, External affairs,...etc.

 

Likewise why not spell stand on new states across India? Are they considering how long the agitation is, or how exploited they are by other regions or economic/HDI development or assembly resolution or per population. The voter has right to ask for their stand because it is major issue has the potential to disintegrate India in near future.

Posted

You are still missing my point.

 

In 2009 AP polls, there was majorly Cong vs Grand Alliance w/TRS. On Telangana issue Cong favored to institute a committee and while Alliance key partner said the first sign of their govt will be on separate TG bill. So the voters choose between the two based on their opinions. Likewise every party including BJP spell their stands on various issues like Ram Mandir, Article 377, Linking of Rivers, External affairs,...etc.

 

Likewise why not spell stand on new states across India? Are they considering how long the agitation is, or how exploited they are by other regions or economic/HDI development or assembly resolution or per population. The voter has right to ask for their stand because it is major issue has the potential to disintegrate India in near future.

 

If SRC is an important issue to comment on, they would.

 

But since they hope its a one-off case, they don't want to trigger the alarm just yet. Perhaps.

 

state reorganisation should be done on give need to do basis, not on the back of rules drawn up by bureaucrats..

 

given how poorly our policies are written in general, its better SRC is not reintroduced.

×
×
  • Create New...