chittimallu14 Posted January 19, 2014 Report Posted January 19, 2014 Murray better than these two? Go home narsayya, you are drunk
dkc Posted January 19, 2014 Report Posted January 19, 2014 Murray better than these two? Go home narsayya, you are drunk I don't drink. I used to love Federer until 2006. Grand Slam titles are immaterial to me.. Their style of play is what inspires me to watch them.. Murray atleast tries a lot of variations in a match (the ones he plays well). I like several other players. Gustavo Kuerten will be my all time fav. yours?
dkc Posted January 19, 2014 Report Posted January 19, 2014 Nadal comes into a tennis court armed with a hammer. His top spin forehand shot is perhaps the most dangerous shot in tennis, ever. Its 100 times better than the guy who first played that shot, Alberto Berasategui and ended up with wrist injuries every alternate year. Djokovic is probably the only one who can smother Nadal's forehand.. Wawrinka tried to do it in style a few times.. But I doubt he can succeed where Federer had failed. I'm rooting for Wawrinka in 2014. When he plays well, he's a pleasure to watch.
chittimallu14 Posted January 19, 2014 Report Posted January 19, 2014 I don't drink. I used to love Federer until 2006. Grand Slam titles are immaterial to me.. Their style of play is what inspires me to watch them.. Murray atleast tries a lot of variations in a match (the ones he plays well). I like several other players. Gustavo Kuerten will be my all time fav. yours?andy roddick
pisinari Posted January 19, 2014 Report Posted January 19, 2014 Nadal is unique with his top spin forehand.. The only player who had such a forehand earlier was Alberto Berasategui who was French Open runner up in 1994, the year I started watching tennis. He suffered injuries through out his career and wasn't able to make any more runs to Grand Slam titles. Djokovic has a solid game, one dimensional and can put people to sleep. Both are crap.. atleast Djokovic has the excuse of not having any special talents. Nadal wastes his talent by playing like a defensive boxer by waiting for his opponent to make the first mistake. Nadal vs Djokovic has to be the worst match in tennis ever. Both take 5 hrs to finish the match, that could've been finished in under 3 hrs, if they hadn't asked for towels at the end of every first fault. lol. Murray is awesome compared to these two. Gasquet is my favourite.. Grigor Dimitrov's game is exceptional among the younger players. Someone should just hand over another 10 Grand Slam titles to Nadal and Djokovic and urge them to retire so tennis can be saved. LOL at your comments... Tennis became more interesting after the arrival of Rafael Nadal. Look at his fan base...nobody matches him. Tennis will miss its best warrior the day he retires...
chittimallu14 Posted January 19, 2014 Report Posted January 19, 2014 LOL at your comments... Tennis became more interesting after the arrival of Rafael Nadal. Look at his fan base...nobody matches him. Tennis will miss its best warrior the day he retires...I guess you entered youe adolescence an year ago.....tennis didnt turn intersting after Nadal's entry because it always was.... sampras agassi goran marat safin leyton hewitt roddick federer itla saala mandi unde vallu okapudu.....
ChandraSekharCherukuri Posted January 19, 2014 Report Posted January 19, 2014 I guess you entered youe adolescence an year ago.....tennis didnt turn intersting after Nadal's entry because it always was.... sampras agassi goran marat safin leyton hewitt roddick federer itla saala mandi unde vallu okapudu..... correst ankul, Sampras and Federer are like sachin in crcket. vallu oka phenomena create chesaru. Chala mandi impact create chesaru kaani , Sampras and Fed laaga anta impace evaru create cheyyala Nadal gaadu last 2 -3 years nundi baaga aduthuandu , antaka mundu vaadu only Clay clort king anevallu Nadal mx inko 2-3 years vutadu , hea had so many injuries,
chittimallu14 Posted January 19, 2014 Report Posted January 19, 2014 Nadalrofl....neekendhuk bey ee thadlu poi jagan ki hp kottu po
pisinari Posted January 19, 2014 Report Posted January 19, 2014 I guess you entered youe adolescence an year ago.....tennis didnt turn intersting after Nadal's entry because it always was.... sampras agassi goran marat safin leyton hewitt roddick federer itla saala mandi unde vallu okapudu..... It doesnt matter when i entered adolescence. I stated a fact. go and check the statistics if you need. FYI I am big fan of Sampras...
pisinari Posted January 19, 2014 Report Posted January 19, 2014 I guess you entered youe adolescence an year ago.....tennis didnt turn intersting after Nadal's entry because it always was.... sampras agassi goran marat safin leyton hewitt roddick federer itla saala mandi unde vallu okapudu..... roddick, hewitt, safin annavante nee tennis knowledge ardham avutondi le...they dont deserve to be on that list...
chittimallu14 Posted January 19, 2014 Report Posted January 19, 2014 correst ankul, Sampras and Federer are like sachin in crcket. vallu oka phenomena create chesaru. Chala mandi impact create chesaru kaani , Sampras and Fed laaga anta impace evaru create cheyyala Nadal gaadu last 2 -3 years nundi baaga aduthuandu , antaka mundu vaadu only Clay clort king anevallu Nadal mx inko 2-3 years vutadu , hea had so many injuries,ya appatlo sampras vs agassi rivalry arachakam...same with roddick and fedex.....
chittimallu14 Posted January 19, 2014 Report Posted January 19, 2014 roddick, hewitt, safin annavante nee tennis knowledge ardham avutondi le...they dont deserve to be on that list...ya the same when u said above about nadal making the sport intersting
pisinari Posted January 19, 2014 Report Posted January 19, 2014 correst ankul, Sampras and Federer are like sachin in crcket. vallu oka phenomena create chesaru. Chala mandi impact create chesaru kaani , Sampras and Fed laaga anta impace evaru create cheyyala Nadal gaadu last 2 -3 years nundi baaga aduthuandu , antaka mundu vaadu only Clay clort king anevallu Nadal mx inko 2-3 years vutadu , hea had so many injuries, each one has their own unique style, sampras for his serve and volley game. fed for his ease of play. but fighting spirit ante ento tennis ki nerpindi nadal...nobody can deny that. evaraina sare 30 varake prime lo vuntaru be it pete, roger or nadal...nadal is no exception...
pisinari Posted January 19, 2014 Report Posted January 19, 2014 ya the same when u said above about nadal making the sport intersting you cannot deny that, the sport would have gone one dimensional with fed winning 30 gs if nadal has not entered. def the game would have been boring with fed winning 30gslms...
.thumb.jpg.ce42bb16ec102475a78c2087ce269c7d.jpg)
.thumb.gif.343fe49c7e1c507ae0056326bd8cf77e.gif)
Recommended Posts