****CHIRU Vs BALAYYA****

[srdh21]

[quote author=govardhan link=topic=54534.msg531417#msg531417 date=1270050819]
pak lo unna hindus ni must gaa india vellipovali analedhu mama...even today there are hindus in pakistan...danish kaneria is one of them...and gandhi quote gurinchi aithe nenu eppudoo vinaledhu mama..so dani gurinchi nenu  no comment no comment
[/quote]

I am well aware of the fact that there are Hindus in Pak, the point is how much religious freedom you have in Pak compared to India for Non Hindu Religions

name any other Hindu who has shined being in pakistan apart from dinesh kaneria who lasted for few year in Cricket

vellipomani cheppaledu... vellipoyetatlu chesaru, those who remained there are called mohajirs and they are ill treated even today

10 million hindus were killed in Pak during independence

if someone has access to British Library or London Library .. search for this data

[Company]

navvu ostundhi konni comments chustunte........

sontha life gurunchi chuskoni deshani idshipetti ouchi....
ippudu life motham desham kosam ankitham chesinavalla medha comment chestunru...let it be gandhi or baghat singh....both of them completely left there personal lifes, lived and died for the country.

They did what they felt is right from their point of view, based on the situations and circumstances at that time....now who are we to question their deeds. First lets prove something about ourselves atleast comparable to their lifes and then it may make us eligible to comment or question on them.

[b]We are all experts on criticizing and commenting on others faults but very rarely can we be experts on our own faults[/b]


thread starter clear ga chepindu just meku evaru ishtamo chepandi ani anthe dhenini controversial cheyakandi ani

[quote author=kingpru link=topic=54534.msg528432#msg528432 date=1269996362]
[b]andhukani for sange........ippudu bhagat singh vs gandhi disco sedhham.......[/b]

I SUPPORT BHAGHAT SINGH......

[b]NOTE: evaru kottukovadhhu...just evaru ishtamo seppandi anthey.......[/b]
[/quote]


dhenini kuda controversial chesi padeshinru......

[keko__keka]

[quote author=Company link=topic=54534.msg531772#msg531772 date=1270060379]
navvu ostundhi konni comments chustunte........

sontha life gurunchi chuskoni deshani idshipetti ouchi....
ippudu life motham desham kosam ankitham chesinavalla medha comment chestunru...let it be gandhi or baghat singh....both of them completely left there personal lifes, lived and died for the country.

They did what they felt is right from their point of view, based on the situations and circumstances at that time....now who are we to question their deeds. First lets prove something about ourselves atleast comparable to their lifes and then it may make us eligible to comment or question on them.

[b]We are all experts on criticizing and commenting on others faults but very rarely can we be experts on our own faults[/b]


thread starter clear ga chepindu just meku evaru ishtamo chepandi ani anthe dhenini controversial cheyakandi ani


dhenini kuda controversial chesi padeshinru......
[/quote]


point noted company mama  no comment

[kingpru]

[quote author=Company link=topic=54534.msg531772#msg531772 date=1270060379]
navvu ostundhi konni comments chustunte........

sontha life gurunchi chuskoni deshani idshipetti ouchi....
ippudu life motham desham kosam ankitham chesinavalla medha comment chestunru...let it be gandhi or baghat singh....both of them completely left there personal lifes, lived and died for the country.

They did what they felt is right from their point of view, based on the situations and circumstances at that time....now who are we to question their deeds. First lets prove something about ourselves atleast comparable to their lifes and then it may make us eligible to comment or question on them.
[b]We are all experts on criticizing and commenting on others faults but very rarely can we be experts on our own faults[/b]


thread starter clear ga chepindu just meku evaru ishtamo chepandi ani anthe dhenini controversial cheyakandi ani


dhenini kuda controversial chesi padeshinru......
[/quote]

....nijamgane anavasarm gaa yi topic kuda controvesy ayipoyindhi...........

thankyou thankyou thankyou thankyou mama.........chaala baaga cheppav mama...... you rock you rock you rock you rock      +4 rep added mama ......

[srdh21]

[quote author=Company link=topic=54534.msg531772#msg531772 date=1270060379]
navvu ostundhi konni comments chustunte........

sontha life gurunchi chuskoni deshani idshipetti ouchi....
ippudu life motham desham kosam ankitham chesinavalla medha comment chestunru...let it be gandhi or baghat singh....both of them completely left there personal lifes, lived and died for the country.

They did what they felt is right from their point of view, based on the situations and circumstances at that time....now who are we to question their deeds. First lets prove something about ourselves atleast comparable to their lifes and then it may make us eligible to comment or question on them.

[b]We are all experts on criticizing and commenting on others faults but very rarely can we be experts on our own faults[/b]


thread starter clear ga chepindu just meku evaru ishtamo chepandi ani anthe dhenini controversial cheyakandi ani


dhenini kuda controversial chesi padeshinru......
[/quote]

Sir

can you please tell who decides the eligibility criteria to comment on anything

you dont need to be eligible for anything as long you have a constructive analytical approach

they were in public life and we have every right to question their wrong deeds.. there is no rule that we should only talk about their positives.. that will be sycophancy not reality

LIFE MOTTAM DESHAM KOSAM PETTINDI BHAGAT SINGH NOT GANDHI.. MUSUGULO GANDHI GADNI KODA KALIPESUKUNNAVU

GANDHI WAS KILLED AND I LOVE GODSE FOR THAT.. AND IN FACT THERE ARE MANY.. SEE HIS FINAL TESTIMONY TEXT IN COURT

Aa times lo aa situations lo ala chesaru.. so we shud accept ani nuvvu anukuntunnavu... NUVVU ACCEPT CHEYYI.. I DONT MIND, at the same time you forgot that you are also ordering others to stop commenting because you dont like  hear reality about Gandhi because your biased for Gandhi

chinnapati ninchi nenu koda textbooks lo baga chadivaanu Gandhi gurinchi positives.... but later realized that it has political overtones to it and then read about him

I didnt find you reasoning acceptable

[keko__keka]

[quote author=srdh21 link=topic=54534.msg532010#msg532010 date=1270063817]
Sir

can you please tell who decides the eligibility criteria to comment on anything

you dont need to be eligible for anything as long you have a constructive analytical approach

they were in public life and we have every right to question their wrong deeds.. there is no rule that we should only talk about their positives.. that will be sycophancy not reality

LIFE MOTTAM DESHAM KOSAM PETTINDI BHAGAT SINGH NOT GANDHI.. MUSUGULO GANDHI GADNI KODA KALIPESUKUNNAVU

GANDHI WAS KILLED AND I LOVE GODSE FOR THAT.. AND IN FACT THERE ARE MANY.. SEE HIS FINAL TESTIMONY TEXT IN COURT

Aa times lo aa situations lo ala chesaru.. so we shud accept ani nuvvu anukuntunnavu... at the same time you forgot that you are also ordering others to stop commenting because you dont like

I didnt find you reasoning acceptable


[/quote]

nee point ok mama....kani HIS FINAL TESTIMONY TEXT IN COURT unte kochem ivvu flzzzzzz..............gandi emannado telsukovalani undi ........

[govardhan]

[quote author=Company link=topic=54534.msg531772#msg531772 date=1270060379]
navvu ostundhi konni comments chustunte........

sontha life gurunchi chuskoni deshani idshipetti ouchi....
ippudu life motham desham kosam ankitham chesinavalla medha comment chestunru...let it be gandhi or baghat singh....both of them completely left there personal lifes, lived and died for the country.

They did what they felt is right from their point of view, based on the situations and circumstances at that time....now who are we to question their deeds. First lets prove something about ourselves atleast comparable to their lifes and then it may make us eligible to comment or question on them.

[b]We are all experts on criticizing and commenting on others faults but very rarely can we be experts on our own faults[/b]


thread starter clear ga chepindu just meku evaru ishtamo chepandi ani anthe dhenini controversial cheyakandi ani


dhenini kuda controversial chesi padeshinru......
[/quote]

yeah iddaru gr8 ye mama...evvaru takkuva kaadhu evvaru ekkuva kaadhu....and also i accept that we r no where in astage to decide who is better or compare the two of them...but ikkada kingpru mama vesina thread.....gandhi ....bhagat lalo meeku evaru ante ishtam ? ani...chala mandi direect ga vaallaki evaru ishtamoo cheppesaaru.....inkontha mandi..compare chesaru.....conclude chesaaru.....avi manam aapalemu kabatti  no comment no comment

[sid_22]

I have lot of respect for Mahatma Gandhi, but at the same time and he was made popular as the father of the nation........... Infact leaders like Bhaghat Singh did not get proper recognition..........

Everything is Mahatma Gandhi from India currency notes to statues all across India...... But there is nothing about Bhaghat Singh and some other important freedom fighters that children of this generation should have to know.

All they(children) think is Mahatma Gandhi alone brought independence to India single handedly......

For me Bhaghat Singh rockzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz dancegdb dancegdb dancegdb dancegdb ^^" ^^" ^^"

[srdh21]

[quote author=keko__keka link=topic=54534.msg532022#msg532022 date=1270064121]
nee point ok mama....kani HIS FINAL TESTIMONY TEXT IN COURT unte kochem ivvu flzzzzzz..............gandi emannado telsukovalani undi ........
[/quote]

Nathuram Godse Final testimony in Court

I hope everyone understand that minutes before someone is hanged.. no will will say lies

Born in a devotional Brahmin family, I instinctively came to revere Hindu religion, Hindu history and Hindu culture. I had, therefore, been intensely proud of Hinduism as a whole. As I grew up I developed a tendency to free thinking unfettered by any superstitious allegiance to any isms, political or religious. That is why I worked actively for the eradication of untouchability and the caste system based on birth alone. I openly joined anti-caste movements and maintained that all Hindus were of equal status as to rights, social and religious and should be considered high or low on merit alone and not through the accident of birth in a particular caste or profession. I used publicly to take part in organized anti-caste dinners in which thousands of Hindus, Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaisyas, Chamars and Bhangis participated. We broke the caste rules and dined in the company of each other.



I have read the speeches and writings of Dadabhai Nairoji, Vivekanand, Gokhale, Tilak, along with the books of ancient and modern history of India and some prominent countries like England, France, America and' Russia. Moreover I studied the tenets of Socialism and Marxism. But above all I studied very closely whatever Veer Savarkar and Gandhiji had written and spoken, as to my mind these two ideologies have contributed more to the moulding of the thought and action of the Indian people during the last thirty years or so, than any other single factor has done.



All this reading and thinking led me to believe it was my first duty to serve Hindudom and Hindus both as a patriot and as a world citizen. To secure the freedom and to safeguard the just interests of some thirty crores (300 million) of Hindus would automatically constitute the freedom and the well being of all India, one fifth of human race. This conviction led me naturally to devote myself to the Hindu Sanghtanist ideology and programme, which alone, I came to believe, could win and preserve the national independence of Hindustan, my Motherland, and enable her to render true service to humanity as well.



Since the year 1920, that is, after the demise of Lokamanya Tilak, Gandhiji's influence in the Congress first increased and then became supreme. His activities for public awakening were phenomenal in their intensity and were reinforced by the slogan of truth and non-violence, which he paraded ostentatiously before the country. No sensible or enlightened person could object to those slogans. In fact there is nothing new or original in them. They are implicit in every constitutional public movement. But it is nothing but a mere dream if you imagine that the bulk of mankind is, or can ever become, capable of scrupulous adherence to these lofty principles in its normal life from day to day. In fact, honour, duty and love of one's own kith and kin and country might often compel us to disregard non-violence and to use force. I could never conceive that an armed resistance to an aggression is unjust. I would consider it a religious and moral duty to resist and, if possible, to overpower such an enemy by use of force. [In the Ramayana] Rama killed Ravana in a tumultuous fight and relieved Sita. [In the Mahabharata], Krishna killed Kansa to end his wickedness; and Arjuna had to fight and slay quite a number of his friends and relations including the revered Bhishma because the latter was on the side of the aggressor. It is my firm belief that in dubbing Rama, Krishna and Arjuna as guilty of violence, the Mahatma betrayed a total ignorance of the springs of human action.



In more recent history, it was the heroic fight put up by Chhatrapati Shivaji that first checked and eventually destroyed the Muslim tyranny in India. It was absolutely essentially for Shivaji to overpower and kill an aggressive Afzal Khan, failing which he would have lost his own life. In condemning history's towering warriors like Shivaji, Rana Pratap and Guru Gobind Singh as misguided patriots, Gandhiji has merely exposed his self-conceit. He was, paradoxical, as it may appear, a violent pacifist who brought untold calamities on the country in the name of truth and non-violence, while Rana Pratap, Shivaji and the Guru will remain enshrined in the hearts of their countrymen forever for the freedom they brought to them.



The accumulating provocation of thirty-two years, culminating in his last pro-Muslim fast, at last goaded me to the conclusion that the existence of Gandhi should be brought to an end immediately. Gandhi had done very well in South Africa to uphold the rights and well being of the Indian community there. But when he finally returned to India he developed a subjective mentality under which he alone was to be the final judge of what was right or wrong. If the country wanted his leadership, it had to accept his infallibility; if it did not, he would stand aloof from the Congress and carry on his own way. Against such an attitude there can be no halfway house. Either Congress had to surrender its will to his and had to be content with playing second fiddle to all his eccentricity, whimsicality, metaphysics and primitive vision, or it had to carry on without him. He alone was the Judge of everyone and everything; he was the master brain guiding the civil disobedience movement; no other could know the technique of that movement. He alone knew when to begin and when to withdraw it. The movement might succeed or fail, it might bring untold disaster and political reverses but that could make no difference to the Mahatma's infallibility. 'A Satyagrahi can never fail' was his formula for declaring his own infallibility and nobody except himself knew what a Satyagrahi is.



Thus, the Mahatma became the judge and jury in his own cause. These childish insanities and obstinacies, coupled with a most severe austerity of life, ceaseless work and lofty character made Gandhi formidable and irresistible. Many people thought that his politics were irrational but they had either to withdraw from the Congress or place their intelligence at his feet to do with, as he liked. In a position of such absolute irresponsibility Gandhi was guilty of blunder after blunder, failure after failure, disaster after disaster.



Gandhi's pro-Muslim policy is blatantly in his perverse attitude on the question of the national language of India. It is quite obvious that Hindi has the most prior claim to be accepted as the premier language. In the beginning of his career in India, Gandhi gave a great impetus to Hindi but as he found that the Muslims did not like it, he became a champion of what is called Hindustani. Everybody in India knows that there is no language called Hindustani; it has no grammar; it has no vocabulary. It is a mere dialect; it is spoken, but not written. It is a bastard tongue and crossbreed between Hindi and Urdu, and not even the Mahatma's sophistry could make it popular. But in his desire to please the Muslims he insisted that Hindustani alone should be the national language of India. His blind followers, of course, supported him and the so-called hybrid language began to be used. The charm and purity of the Hindi language was to be prostituted to please the Muslims. All his experiments were at the expense of the Hindus.



From August 1946 onwards the private armies of the Muslim League began a massacre of the Hindus. The then Viceroy, Lord Wavell, though distressed at what was happening, would not use his powers under the Government of India Act of 1935 to prevent the rape, murder and arson. The Hindu blood began to flow from Bengal to Karachi with some retaliation by the Hindus. The Interim Government formed in September was sabotaged by its Muslim League members right from its inception, but the more they became disloyal and treasonable to the government of which they were a part, the greater was Gandhi's infatuation for them. Lord Wavell had to resign as he could not bring about a settlement and he was succeeded by Lord Mountbatten. King Log was followed by King Stork.



The Congress, which had boasted of its nationalism and socialism, secretly accepted Pakistan literally at the point of the bayonet and abjectly surrendered to Jinnah. India was vivisected and one-third of the Indian territory became foreign land to us from August 15, 1947. Lord Mountbatten came to be described in Congress circles as the greatest Viceroy and Governor-General this country ever had. The official date for handing over power was fixed for June 30, 1948, but Mountbatten with his ruthless surgery gave us a gift of vivisected India ten months in advance. This is what Gandhi had achieved after thirty years of undisputed dictatorship and this is what Congress party calls 'freedom' and 'peaceful transfer of power'. The Hindu-Muslim unity bubble was finally burst and a theocratic state was established with the consent of Nehru and his crowd and they have called 'freedom won by them with sacrifice' - whose sacrifice? When top leaders of Congress, with the consent of Gandhi, divided and tore the country - which we consider a deity of worship - my mind was filled with direful anger.



One of the conditions imposed by Gandhi for his breaking of the fast unto death related to the mosques in Delhi occupied by the Hindu refugees. But when Hindus in Pakistan were subjected to violent attacks he did not so much as utter a single word to protest and censure the Pakistan Government or the Muslims concerned. Gandhi was shrewd enough to know that while undertaking a fast unto death, had he imposed for its break some condition on the Muslims in Pakistan, there would have been found hardly any Muslims who could have shown some grief if the fast had ended in his death. It was for this reason that he purposely avoided imposing any condition on the Muslims. He was fully aware of from the experience that Jinnah was not at all perturbed or influenced by his fast and the Muslim League hardly attached any value to the inner voice of Gandhi.



Gandhi is being referred to as the Father of the Nation. But if that is so, he had failed his paternal duty inasmuch as he has acted very treacherously to the nation by his consenting to the partitioning of it. I stoutly maintain that Gandhi has failed in his duty. He has proved to be the Father of Pakistan. His inner-voice, his spiritual power and his doctrine of non-violence of which so much is made of, all crumbled before Jinnah's iron will and proved to be powerless.



Briefly speaking, I thought to myself and foresaw I shall be totally ruined, and the only thing I could expect from the people would be nothing but hatred and that I shall have lost all my honour, even more valuable than my life, if I were to kill Gandhiji. But at the same time I felt that the Indian politics in the absence of Gandhiji would surely be proved practical, able to retaliate, and would be powerful with armed forces. No doubt, my own future would be totally ruined, but the nation would be saved from the inroads of Pakistan. People may even call me and dub me as devoid of any sense or foolish, but the nation would be free to follow the course founded on the reason which I consider to be necessary for sound nation-building. After having fully considered the question, I took the final decision in the matter, but I did not speak about it to anyone whatsoever. I took courage in both my hands and I did fire the shots at Gandhiji on 30th January 1948, on the prayer-grounds of Birla House.



I do say that my shots were fired at the person whose policy and action had brought rack and ruin and destruction to millions of Hindus. There was no legal machinery by which such an offender could be brought to book and for this reason I fired those fatal shots.



I bear no ill will towards anyone individually but I do say that I had no respect for the present government owing to their policy, which was unfairly favourable towards the Muslims. But at the same time I could clearly see that the policy was entirely due to the presence of Gandhi. I have to say with great regret that Prime Minister Nehru quite forgets that his preachings and deeds are at times at variances with each other when he talks about India as a secular state in season and out of season, because it is significant to note that Nehru has played a leading role in the establishment of the theocratic state of Pakistan, and his job was made easier by Gandhi's persistent policy of appeasement towards the Muslims.



I now stand before the court to accept the full share of my responsibility for what I have done and the judge would, of course, pass against me such orders of sentence as may be considered proper. But I would like to add that I do not desire any mercy to be shown to me, nor do I wish that anyone else should beg for mercy on my behalf. My confidence about the moral side of my action has not been shaken even by the criticism levelled against it on all sides. I have no doubt that honest writers of history will weigh my act and find the true value thereof some day in future.

[srdh21]

any one who read this complete text will understand what wrong Gandhi was doing at that time

mana parents times or untill late mid 90's daaka technology and internet anya develop kaledu kabatta ... political party can use propaganda to show someone as Great leader ( Gandhi is congress president multiple times)

but now, we all have matured enough to say something as wrong if you observe something wrong

if we dont know anything,w e have the tools to know about anything.. so the concept of beliefs from our highly modified and subversed historical text books we studied are just for time pass

Small question

Apart from reading about great thiefs and foerign invaders from arab countries, british invasion, lost hindu kings , mow much % of time we  have spent more time on reading about Maurya dynasty, Chola Dynasty, Cultural Supremacy of India over rest of the world

There is no Lifetime achievement in current scenario... every bad deed is sure to come out today or tomorrow

no doubt why crows and birds Gandhi Statues to clean their tummy

[wolverine]

kukkalnii kottinaattuu kottinaa ee naa kodukjalikii siggu raaduuu.... .thuu

[kingpru]

[quote author=srdh21 link=topic=54534.msg532384#msg532384 date=1270069838]
any one who read this complete text will understand what wrong Gandhi was doing at that time

mana parents times or untill late mid 90's daaka technology and internet anya develop kaledu kabatta ... political party can use propaganda to show someone as Great leader ( Gandhi is congress president multiple times)

but now, we all have matured enough to say something as wrong if you observe something wrong

if we dont know anything,w e have the tools to know about anything.. so the concept of beliefs from our highly modified and subversed historical text books we studied are just for time pass

Small question

Apart from reading about great thiefs and foerign invaders from arab countries, british invasion, lost hindu kings , mow much % of time we  have spent more time on reading about Maurya dynasty, Chola Dynasty, Cultural Supremacy of India over rest of the world

There is no Lifetime achievement in current scenario... every bad deed is sure to come out today or tomorrow

no doubt why crows and birds Gandhi Statues to clean their tummy


[/quote]

nenu chadiva mama mothham.........nijam gaa chaala bagundhi mama............ you rock you rock you rock mama .........after sometne niku rep add sestha mama...........

[wolverine]

okka peddannaya oka mrugarajuu dorikina chota alla guddalo rod pettaruu balaayya fans lan*a kodakallaraaa meeku mee herolakii mati mo..a undaa???????????

[kingpru]

[quote author=wolverine link=topic=54534.msg532414#msg532414 date=1270070355]
kukkalnii kottinaattuu kottinaa ee naa kodukjalikii siggu raaduuu.... .thuu
[/quote]

mama evarini tiduthunnav mama.............endhuku tiduthunnav.....?????? (!>< (!>< (!>< (!><

[Company]

[quote author=srdh21 link=topic=54534.msg532010#msg532010 date=1270063817]
Sir

can you please tell who decides the eligibility criteria to comment on anything

you dont need to be eligible for anything as long you have a constructive analytical approach
[/quote]

Who decides eligibility ante, evaru decide cheyaru, you should prove it yourself,  na uddesham entidhi ante…… …..appud eppodo jarigina so called blunders ni patkoni pekulade badhalu……y don’t you go and stop or atleast try to stop the huge blunders happening these days to the country…inka constructive approach antunav……nuv etlanti approach la ouchinavo oka sari kindly refer back…….
Vall iddhariki dhamu undhi kabbati vallu……..vallaki right anpichina Panini initiative theskoni..they moved forward…..
Currency note medha Gandhi bomma chuste…..you hate it kadha……then y don’t you convince the whole country for that and get it removed…….this will prove ur efficiency. Even I will salute to you then.
apput la kuda kondharu undiundouchu…..just intlo kurchoni…..vare vallu chese panilani thittukunta kurchunollu. Atlanti vallani evaru gurthu petkoru ippudu. Apputla kuda evaru pattickoni undaru.


[quote]
they were in public life and we have every right to question their wrong deeds.. there is no rule that we should only talk about their positives.. that will be sycophancy not reality
[/quote]
IF they were in public life….it makes sense if you question them face to face…..or somehow in a way that the question reaches them. But, from whom are you expecting answers now. What does this mean, when a problem arises you sit idle unable to decide what to do……and when some capable person takes an initiative, spends his life time to solve the problem, and finally resolves it. You start questioning him, criticizing him and his way of approach. What makes you eligible to question him, though the outcome may not satisfy you?
I would have agreed if baghat singh himself questioned Gandhi. But who r u.
Question the present day leaders if you can…….and stop them from doing their wrong deeds. We even don’t  at least spend one day in our lives to do something for the country and get ready to criticize others who spent most of their lives to the country.
[quote]
LIFE MOTTAM DESHAM KOSAM PETTINDI BHAGAT SINGH NOT GANDHI.. MUSUGULO GANDHI GADNI KODA KALIPESUKUNNAVU
[/quote]
Gandhi ni musukula evvaru kalpaleru. I am openly saying it. Just read the life history of Gandhi u will realize how much time of his life he spent for the country
[quote]
GANDHI WAS KILLED AND I LOVE GODSE FOR THAT.. AND IN FACT THERE ARE MANY.. SEE HIS FINAL TESTIMONY TEXT IN COURT
[/quote]
This statement is showing that you are hiding under godse’s shelter. You are using him as a shield to defend your previous comments. I mean why did godse come here, who criticized him. He went to Gandhi face to face, and did what he felt right, I agree with it. But how will your love for godse let you question Gandhi.
[quote]
Aa times lo aa situations lo ala chesaru.. so we shud accept ani nuvvu anukuntunnavu... NUVVU ACCEPT CHEYYI.. I DONT MIND, at the same time you forgot that you are also ordering others to stop commenting because you dont like  hear reality about Gandhi because your biased for Gandhi

chinnapati ninchi nenu koda textbooks lo baga chadivaanu Gandhi gurinchi positives.... but later realized that it has political overtones to it and then read about him

I didnt find you reasoning acceptable
[/quote]

When did I order you to accept, I don’t see it anywhere, can you please kindly quote it.  I just told to question yourself and that was it.
Gandhi gurunchi reality nuvu chepedhi endhi…….google la search cheste evarki aina dorkutadhi.
All I was pointing in my previous post was that the thread starter told just to tell whom you like the most, not to criticize someone.
And I never told that Gandhi is 100% right.
Inka noble prize gurinchi kuda emo cheppinav…….neku evaru chepinru Gandhi ki noble prize iyyaponeki reason??….any source…….war la medha war lu chese obama ke ichinru noble peace prize,…..thats showing how biased they are…nuvu vallani enakaeskosthunnava
And when did I tell you to accept my reasoning. I am least bothered by it.
Inka dheni pina arguments petkoni waste.....ardham aithe ardham chesko.leka pothe lite thesko.....