Supreme Court Proposes Csk, Rajasthan Royals Shouldn't Be In Ipl 7

[timmy]

The Supreme Court, which on Tuesday wanted N. Srinivasan to step down as BCCI president to ensure a fair probe into the IPL betting and match-fixing scandal, will pass an interim an order on Friday. The top court made no decision on Srinivasan, whose son-in-law Gurunath Meiyappan of Chennai Super Kings has been indicted for betting and sharing team information, but suggested that Sunil Gavaskar could be the interim chief. The Supreme Court has suggested that a person like Sunil Gavaskar could be the interim chief. 

The court, after hearing all the arguments, proposed that Chennai Super Kings and Rajasthan Royals should not be part of the IPL. Due to conflict of interest, anyone employed by India Cements, should be kept out of the tournament. India Cements owns CSK, whose Managing Director is Srinivasan. India Cements also employs Indian skipper Mahendra Singh Dhoni and Sunder Raman, the man who runs IPL.

[timmy]

In a sensational twist to the IPL spot-fixing scandal, the Supreme Court on Thursday proposed to the Board of Control for Cricket in India that Chennai Super Kings and Rajasthan Royals should not be allowed to participate in the seventh season of Indian Premier League.

The apex court also suggested that legendary Indian batsmen Sunil Gavaskar should be named BCCI president as current chief N Srinivasan has said that pending inquiry he shall step aside.

ALSO SEE Dhoni guilty of corrupt conduct

The Supreme Court, which on Tuesday wanted Srinivasan to step down as president to ensure a fair probe into the IPL betting and match-fixing scandal, will now pass an interim an order on Friday. The top court made no decision on Srinivasan, whose son-in-law Gurunath Meiyappan of Chennai Super Kings has been indicted for betting and sharing team information.

File photo of the Chennai Super Kings team celebrating during one of the IPL6 matches. (BCCI Images)

Also, Harish Salve, one of the senior lawyers arguing the Justice Mudgal Committee report case before the Supreme Court claimed that India skipper Mahendra Singh Dhoni is guilty of corrupt conduct because he gave false statements to the Mudgal Committee about Gurunath Meiyappan's role with the Chennai Super Kings.

[posaanisam]

Oh teri..Oh teri...Jai balayya...Jai Balayya  

 

Oh teri..Oh teri...Jai balayya...Jai Balayya  

 

Oh teri..Oh teri...Jai balayya...Jai Balayya  

 

Oh teri..Oh teri...Jai balayya...Jai Balayya  

 

[timmy]

Petitioner's lawyer Harish Salve has claimed that Dhoni is an employee of India Cements which leads to a conflict of interest: Firstpost

[timmy]

Harish Salve, as reported by Firstpost, has also said that Dhoni gave false statement to the Mudgal committee

[timmy]

SC during the hearing has maintained that any person having any relation with India cements should not be allowed to function in BCCI

[posaanisam]

Petitioner's lawyer Harish Salve has claimed that Dhoni is an employee of India Cements which leads to a conflict of interest: Firstpost

ee sreenivasan gadini lepeste sagam bagupadutundi...

 

 

Oh teri..Oh teri...Jai balayya...Jai Balayya  

 

Oh teri..Oh teri...Jai balayya...Jai Balayya  

 

Oh teri..Oh teri...Jai balayya...Jai Balayya  

 

Oh teri..Oh teri...Jai balayya...Jai Balayya  

[jpnarayan1]

Sentational news kada... 100s of Crores business effect avuthadi

[jpnarayan1]

Antha easy ga avadu anukuntaa edo okati chestharu

[shango]

Antha easy ga avadu anukuntaa edo okati chestharu

 

lock chesukondi thread loki vachey

[timmy]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qyxZpPI6lo

[timmy]

Dhoni gaadi meedha baaga allegations chesaadu Lawyer Harish salve

[posaanisam]

Sentational news kada... 100s of Crores business effect avuthadi

anta easy ga vadileste players ni konukuna valu inko stay vestaru...

ee season ki ila kanichestaru le

[timmy]

anta easy ga vadileste players ni konukuna valu inko stay vestaru...

ee season ki ila kanichestaru le

Yaa India lo Law Commonman Ki takkuva Businessman ki ekkuva use avthundhi

[jpnarayan1]

Yaa India lo Law Commonman Ki takkuva Businessman ki ekkuva use avthundhi

Indian law evarikina okate but baga law vadinchevaallanu businessmans offered cheyagalugutharu common man cheyaledu that's the diff