perugu_vada Posted May 6, 2014 Report Posted May 6, 2014 H4 vaallaki EAD istharu.. H1 vaalla validity unna rojulu veellaki EAD vasthundachuhmm i dont think they will pass d bill as it is, amendments pedatharu pakka
mettastar Posted May 6, 2014 Author Report Posted May 6, 2014 hmm i dont think they will pass d bill as it is, amendments pedatharu pakka Bhayya this won't go to senate or house.. DHS and USCIS vaalle fix chesthunnaru.. DHS rule making process gurinchi google seyyi
perugu_vada Posted May 7, 2014 Report Posted May 7, 2014 Bhayya this won't go to senate or house.. DHS and USCIS vaalle fix chesthunnaru.. DHS rule making process gurinchi google seyyihmm lets c how it goes Ead ochesthe just IT sector lo ne kakunda verey sectors lo nu dhigutharu ga manollu, when compared to chinese manolla communication skills are much better
kakatiya Posted May 7, 2014 Report Posted May 7, 2014 2008 - master students ki manchi proposal testhanu -obama 2009- proposal postponed 2010- gc acceptance time wont be same for master students 2011- h1 spouses can work 2012. - all in proposal stage 2013 - all in proposal stage 2014 - all in proposal stage These are nothing but status updates of proposals just because some one has to update the webpage as he or she getting paid
k2s Posted May 7, 2014 Report Posted May 7, 2014 2008 - master students ki manchi proposal testhanu -obama 2009- proposal postponed 2010- gc acceptance time wont be same for master students 2011- h1 spouses can work 2012. - all in proposal stage 2013 - all in proposal stage 2014 - all in proposal stage 2020 - all in proposal stage :D
kakatiya Posted May 7, 2014 Report Posted May 7, 2014 If this is accepted it is gud For all housewives who can save money applying h1b Bad for opt guys as they hae to work for few dollars less considering the bargain discounts from housewives ... Especially there are many pharmasicts house wives who cant get h1b on their education background Sorry if it sounds offensive to anyone Even they allow it , there are many proposals made before which are not passed yet.
mettastar Posted May 7, 2014 Author Report Posted May 7, 2014 2008 - master students ki manchi proposal testhanu -obama 2009- proposal postponed 2010- gc acceptance time wont be same for master students 2011- h1 spouses can work 2012. - all in proposal stage 2013 - all in proposal stage 2014 - all in proposal stage These are nothing but status updates of proposals just because some one has to update the webpage as he or she getting paid It's not status update bro. DHS director change ayyadu and he is meeting with all ethnic group representatives.. and Obama gadu kuda rendu moodu meetings lo annadu.. immigration reform pass avvatledu kabatti he will use his powers to fix broken laws ani.. and idhi chaala rojula nunchi pending lo undhi anduke start chesaru
mettastar Posted May 7, 2014 Author Report Posted May 7, 2014 If this is accepted it is gud For all housewives who can save money applying h1b Bad for opt guys as they hae to work for few dollars less considering the bargain discounts from housewives ... Especially there are many pharmasicts house wives who cant get h1b on their education background Sorry if it sounds offensive to anyone Even they allow it , there are many proposals made before which are not passed yet. Most of those proposals were introduced or included in some bill and they got rejected.. kaani idi bill kaadhugaa admin fix kadha.. chestharemo Anna hope.. Dreamers act makku gaallaki EAD lu ichaduga
kakatiya Posted May 7, 2014 Report Posted May 7, 2014 Most of those proposals were introduced or included in some bill and they got rejected.. kaani idi bill kaadhugaa admin fix kadha.. chestharemo Anna hope.. Dreamers act makku gaallaki EAD lu ichaduga Makku gallani ekamga naturalised citizens ni chesaru .. They are major chunk of america now Where as desis are only 3%
mettastar Posted May 7, 2014 Author Report Posted May 7, 2014 Makku gallani ekamga naturalised citizens ni chesaru .. They are major chunk of america now Where as desis are only 3% Malli atla cheyalante legal vaallaki Edo oka bisket eyyaliga adhe try chesthunnaremo mari
kakatiya Posted May 7, 2014 Report Posted May 7, 2014 Malli atla cheyalante legal vaallaki Edo oka bisket eyyaliga adhe try chesthunnaremo mari They did that to makku guys for votes Just the way congress did for bangladesh immigrants guys Manaki chesthe vote vesedhi evvadu...
mettastar Posted May 7, 2014 Author Report Posted May 7, 2014 They did that to makku guys for votes Just the way congress did for bangladesh immigrants guys Manaki chesthe vote vesedhi evvadu... Legal vaallaki emcheyatledu ani Peru raakunda
mettastar Posted May 7, 2014 Author Report Posted May 7, 2014 rule making process anta.. see Rulemaking processes are generally designed to ensure that The public is informed of proposed rules before they take effect; The public can comment on the proposed rules and provide additional data to the agency; The public can access the rulemaking record and analyse the data and analysis behind a proposed rule; The agency analyses and responds to the public's comments; The agency creates a permanent record of its analysis and the process; The agency's actions can be reviewed by a judge or others to ensure the correct process was followed. For example, a typical U.S. federal rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.§551, et seq. [1] would contain these steps: Legislation. The U.S. Congress passes a law, containing an organic statute that creates a new administrative agency, and that outlines general goals the agency is to pursue through its rulemaking. Similarly, Congress may prescribe such goals and rulemaking duties to a pre-existing agency. Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. This optional step entails publishing the agency's initial analysis of the subject matter, often asking for early public input on key issues. Any data or communications regarding the upcoming rule would be made available to the public for review. Occasionally, a board of potentially affected parties is comprised to do give-and-take bargaining over rulemaking subject-matter which would otherwise result in deadlocked opposition by an interested party.[2] This is commonly called "negotiated rulemaking",[2] and results in more custom-tailored proposed rule. Proposed Rule. In this step, the agency publishes the actual proposed regulatory language in the Federal Register; in which a discussion of the justification and analysis behind the rule is printed, as well as the agency's response to any public comment on the advance notice. Public comment. Once a proposed rule is published in the Federal Register, a public comment period begins, allowing the public to submit written comments to the agency. Most agencies are required to respond to every issue raised in the comments. Depending on the complexity of the rule, comment periods may last for 30 to even 180 days. Final Rule. Usually, the proposed rule becomes the final rule with some minor modifications. In this step, the agency publishes a full response to issues raised by public comments and an updated analysis and justification for the rule, including an analysis of any new data submitted by the public. In some cases, the agency may publish a second draft proposed rule, especially if the new draft is so different from the proposed rule that it raises new issues that have not been submitted to public comment. This again appears in the Federal Register, and if no further steps are taken by the public or interested parties, is codified into the Code of Federal Regulations. Judicial review. In some cases, members of the public or regulated parties file a lawsuit alleging that the rulemaking is improper. While courts generally offer significant deference to the agency's technical expertise, they do review closely whether the regulation exceeds the rulemaking authority granted by the authorizing legislation and whether the agency properly followed the process for public notice and comment. Effective date. Except in extraordinary circumstances, the rule does not become effective for some time after its initial publication to allow regulated parties to come into compliance. Some rules provide several years for compliance. "Hybrid" rulemaking. Not a legal term of art, but describes the kind of rulemaking performed by agencies that is somewhere between formal (with a hearing and record) and informal (with the notice and comment procedures described above). Hybrid rulemaking generally subsumes procedural aspects reserved for adjudication, such as a formal hearing in which interested parties are sworn and subject to cross examination. The statutory construction of the Administrative Procedure Act, as well as the Supreme Court's ruling in Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.,[3] make hybrid-rulemaking proper only when specifically provided for by the U.S. Congress. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rulemaking
gemofau Posted May 20, 2014 Report Posted May 20, 2014 http://www.fragomen.com/ourfirm/xprNewsDetailFrag.aspx?xpST=NewsDetail&news=1790208c-f645-47ca-8454-163a9f0fc1d9&RSS=true
Recommended Posts