princeofheaven Posted May 20, 2014 Report Posted May 20, 2014 rule making process anta.. see Rulemaking processes are generally designed to ensure that The public is informed of proposed rules before they take effect; The public can comment on the proposed rules and provide additional data to the agency; The public can access the rulemaking record and analyse the data and analysis behind a proposed rule; The agency analyses and responds to the public's comments; The agency creates a permanent record of its analysis and the process; The agency's actions can be reviewed by a judge or others to ensure the correct process was followed. For example, a typical U.S. federal rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.§551, et seq. [1] would contain these steps: Legislation. The U.S. Congress passes a law, containing an organic statute that creates a new administrative agency, and that outlines general goals the agency is to pursue through its rulemaking. Similarly, Congress may prescribe such goals and rulemaking duties to a pre-existing agency. Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. This optional step entails publishing the agency's initial analysis of the subject matter, often asking for early public input on key issues. Any data or communications regarding the upcoming rule would be made available to the public for review. Occasionally, a board of potentially affected parties is comprised to do give-and-take bargaining over rulemaking subject-matter which would otherwise result in deadlocked opposition by an interested party.[2] This is commonly called "negotiated rulemaking",[2] and results in more custom-tailored proposed rule. Proposed Rule. In this step, the agency publishes the actual proposed regulatory language in the Federal Register; in which a discussion of the justification and analysis behind the rule is printed, as well as the agency's response to any public comment on the advance notice. Public comment. Once a proposed rule is published in the Federal Register, a public comment period begins, allowing the public to submit written comments to the agency. Most agencies are required to respond to every issue raised in the comments. Depending on the complexity of the rule, comment periods may last for 30 to even 180 days. Final Rule. Usually, the proposed rule becomes the final rule with some minor modifications. In this step, the agency publishes a full response to issues raised by public comments and an updated analysis and justification for the rule, including an analysis of any new data submitted by the public. In some cases, the agency may publish a second draft proposed rule, especially if the new draft is so different from the proposed rule that it raises new issues that have not been submitted to public comment. This again appears in the Federal Register, and if no further steps are taken by the public or interested parties, is codified into the Code of Federal Regulations. Judicial review. In some cases, members of the public or regulated parties file a lawsuit alleging that the rulemaking is improper. While courts generally offer significant deference to the agency's technical expertise, they do review closely whether the regulation exceeds the rulemaking authority granted by the authorizing legislation and whether the agency properly followed the process for public notice and comment. Effective date. Except in extraordinary circumstances, the rule does not become effective for some time after its initial publication to allow regulated parties to come into compliance. Some rules provide several years for compliance. "Hybrid" rulemaking. Not a legal term of art, but describes the kind of rulemaking performed by agencies that is somewhere between formal (with a hearing and record) and informal (with the notice and comment procedures described above). Hybrid rulemaking generally subsumes procedural aspects reserved for adjudication, such as a formal hearing in which interested parties are sworn and subject to cross examination. The statutory construction of the Administrative Procedure Act, as well as the Supreme Court's ruling in Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.,[3] make hybrid-rulemaking proper only when specifically provided for by the U.S. Congress. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rulemaking This is called executive order , obama with limits konni rules pass cheyochu..
innovative Posted May 20, 2014 Report Posted May 20, 2014 are u looking for marriage lookings man.. why man ? are you helping ppl here man .. ?? :D kidding .. no
Spartan Posted May 20, 2014 Report Posted May 20, 2014 why man ? are you helping ppl here man .. ?? :D kidding .. no no helping man....jus asking...
innovative Posted May 20, 2014 Report Posted May 20, 2014 no helping man....jus asking... okay man .. jus kidding ..
Iphone6 Posted May 27, 2014 Report Posted May 27, 2014 same no chnge.. neee discontinued stry la :police:
deleted1 Posted May 27, 2014 Report Posted May 27, 2014 6 yrs complete ayye daka undaru emo.... If they really want to work.......
Recommended Posts