Obama Sign Chesthe Bagundu Labour Day Tharuvatha....

[chedugudu_chidambaram]

http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2014/08/20/how_an_obama_immigration_executive_order_expected_after_labor_day_could.html

[mettastar]

08/21/2014: Clarification of Ongoing Consideration of Treament of Immediate Relatives of Principal Beneficiary of Immigrant Petitions in Immigrant Visa Counts

• The current law involves Section 203(d) of 8 U.S.C, Immigration & Naturality Act which provides that "A spouse or child as defined in subparagraph (A), (B), (C), or (E)....shall,...be entitled to the same status, and the same order of consideration provided in the respective subsection, if accompanying or following to join, the spouse or parent." As readers can see it, the statute does not specifically require that their immigrant visa numbers should be taken out from the numerical limit of various immigrant petitions. It is the INS and USCIS that have restrictively interpreted this statutory section to require to take out such visa numbers from various immigrant petitions annual national numerical limit. Thus whether or not the spouses and children must take out immigrant visa numbers from the annual quota remains a matter of interpretation. Should the President Obama interprete it different way and revises the rules that will provide that they do not take out from the annual national numerical limitation, it can prevail unless such executive action is challenged in the federal courts, eventually before the U.S. Supreme Court, that his interpretation is wrong.
• When we reported this issue, we focused on the employment-based immigration quota system without mentioning other immigrant petitions, such as family-based immigrant petitions, diversity visa immigrant visa petitions, etc. etc. because we were discussing employment-based immigration system. However, the current statute encompasses all types of immigrant petitions and should the President exercise his executive power without limiting it to the employment-based visa petitions, it can cover any types of petitions and family members, which allegedly amount to 800,000. However, whether or not the President would go that far remains a question at this time. We will see whether he will indeed include this new interpretation in the forthcoming executive action and if yes, how far.

[tiger_sathi]

dates current aviuthai bhayya vadu sigjn chesthe.,... endhuku ante 100k-200k total un used GC slots unnai.. and dependents ni thisesthe count nunchi avi kuda bane untai.. so ivi anni free aithe EB@ and all current avuthai...

 

[micxas]

:3D_Smiles_153:

[jason_bourne]

Adi radu man

[tiger_sathi]

labour day tharuvatha chepthadu... so vadu sign chesthe elago republicans oppose kuda cheyaleru.. endhuku ante idhi administrative fix...

[micxas]

AA h1b lu penchara babu, chastunnam .. bye1

[telugu_bidda]

vadi sign chesina e employers gallu I485 apply cheyali ga...akkada thokutharu emo 

[mettastar]

vadi sign chesina e employers gallu I485 apply cheyali ga...akkada thokutharu emo 

chestharu myaan enduku cheyaru...

[libraguy863]

h4 work permit la chestaremo...but iyna current iyan mestri tho 6months vundi anta kada .. how far it is true .. 6yrs nunchi peelchi peelchi pippi chesadu ... vadu vadu pchi p face ...

[ramafdb]

[puli raaja]

saava 10tav emo eka 

[ramafdb]

saava 10tav emo eka 

 

[sheldoncooper]

idi avvadu lee