Vedic Vimanas

[JANASENA]

 

 

 

 

Vedic Vimanas

Vaimanika Shastra is described in Sanskrit in 100 sections, eight chapters, 500 principles and 3000 slokas including 32 techniques to fly an aircraft.

Shivkur Bapuji Talpade was the first person to fly a first unmanned flying
saucer 8 years prior to wright brothers based on advanced Vedic Mercury ion plasma Technology which could fly in all directions. This event was witnessed by 3000 people in 1895.

This feat was witnessed by more than three thousand people including Britishers at Chowpatty beach in 1895,

The airplane was aloft at nearly 200 metres height and was airborne for 18 minutes.

Vedic Vimanas or flying saucers used mercury vortex ion engines. The ion engine was first demonstrated by German-born NASA scientist Ernst Stuhlinger.

[saradagakasepu]

gp

[phoenix_nebula]

http://cgpl.iisc.ernet.in/site/Portals/0/Publications/ReferedJournal/ACriticalStudyOfTheWorkVaimanikaShastra.pdf

 

 

Some more info

[jpismahatma]

 

 

 

 

Vedic Vimanas

Vaimanika Shastra is described in Sanskrit in 100 sections, eight chapters, 500 principles and 3000 slokas including 32 techniques to fly an aircraft.

Shivkur Bapuji Talpade was the first person to fly a first unmanned flying
saucer 8 years prior to wright brothers based on advanced Vedic Mercury ion plasma Technology which could fly in all directions. This event was witnessed by 3000 people in 1895.

This feat was witnessed by more than three thousand people including Britishers at Chowpatty beach in 1895,

The airplane was aloft at nearly 200 metres height and was airborne for 18 minutes.

Vedic Vimanas or flying saucers used mercury vortex ion engines. The ion engine was first demonstrated by German-born NASA scientist Ernst Stuhlinger.

 

fake mama.

 

I dont believe it.

 

we have to give due credit. who has done it.. which is wright brothers.

[phoenix_nebula]

The research they did had some conclusions

 

General Comments and Conclusions

Any reader by now would have

concluded the obvious – that the

planes described above are the

best poor concoctions, rather than

expressions of something real.

None of the planes has properties

or capabilities of being flown; the  

geometries are unimaginably

horrendous from the point of view

of flying; and the principles of

propulsion make then resist rather

than assist flying.

The text and the drawings do not

correlate with each other even

thematically. The drawings

definitely point to a knowledge of

modern machinery. This can be

explained on the basis of the fact

that Shri Ellappa who made the

drawings was in a local engineering

college and was thus familiar with

names and details of some

machinery. Of course the text

retains a structure in language and

content from which its ‘recent

nature’ cannot be asserted. We

must hasten to point out that this

does not imply an oriental nature

of the text at all.   All that may be

said is that thematically the

drawings ought to be ruled out of

discussion. And the text, as it

stands, is incomplete and

ambiguous by itself and incorrect

at many places.

A large number of verses has been

devoted to the metallurgical and

material aspects, as stated earlier.

Also, a number of cross references

indicated in BVS belong to the

subject of materials. (Incidentally,

these references are not to be

found in VS.) This is

understandable since our people

were leaders in this field in earlier

times. A number of materials made

of iron, brass, and bronze, in

existence since times immemorial

and even till this day, are proofs

enough of this feature.

Yet the description of materials and

their making in the text do not

seem to make much sense from

the point of view of making them in

actual practice.

Be this as it may, the text raises

some peripheral questions. One of

them concerns the kind of units

used.   The basic text uses ‘vitasti’

for length, ‘link’ for speed, ‘kaksha’

for heat, & ‘link’ again for electrical

force. The units of speed and

temperature are new and, to the

best of our knowledge, do not have

any easily decipherable meaning.

Some effort was made to

determine the internal consistency

of these units, but this did not

prove successful.

Also, no data have been given

about the weights of crafts and

their components. This is serious

since weight is fundamental to the

flying of heavier‐than‐air machines.

Moreover, the unit of mass does

not even appear anywhere is the

text.

 

[phoenix_nebula]

http://www.pdfarchive.info/pdf/S/Sa/Sastri_Subbaraya_-_The_Vimanika_Shastra.pdf

[jpismahatma]

http://www.pdfarchive.info/pdf/S/Sa/Sastri_Subbaraya_-_The_Vimanika_Shastra.pdf

The Vimanika Shastra is not an actual ancient text. It was channeled, or dictated, to the author from the spirit world in 1918[5].

The spirit who supposedly dictated the text claimed to be and ancient seer named Bharadvada, who is prominent in some ancient writings[6], so I guess that is what is supposed to give this text credibility – that is, the idea that the ghost of someone ancient supposedly dictated it.

But they’re not even sure if that version of the story is true, because the first mention of any of this in in 1952 by the guy who supposedly found and translated this text from 1918[7], so as far as anyone knows he could have made the whole channeled by a famous ghost story up in 1952.

The text itself reads like a technical manual, describing the details of how Vimanas operated. It includes the description of what must have sounded like a really technical idea in 1918 or 1952 called a mercury-vortex engine. Ancient Aliens spends a huge amount of time talking about this idea.

[phoenix_nebula]

All ancient Sanskrit scriptures are actually considered original as sruthis (which are passed on to generations by sound).All the scriptures written (could be excerpts from authors their views get embeeded) are actually not original and categorized as smruthis.

[jpismahatma]

All ancient Sanskrit scriptures are actually considered original as sruthis (which are passed on to generations by sound).All the scriptures written (could be excerpts from authors their views get embeeded) are actually not original and categorized as smruthis.

 

 

so ???

[ChampakDas]

think_ww

[phoenix_nebula]

May be these smruthis are not the original intended knowledge, few of the scriptures were ven stolen from india.So we dont have em, to properly justify the genuinity and pragmatic capability of the text .