Was Sanskrit Language From India? Origin?

[donganaaK]

okasaari, sanskrit origin ani google cheyyandi..adhi non indian ani vasthunayi links loo..adhe artham kavatle naaaku..

 

probably because the westerners are unable to digest the fact that Indian subcontinent was civilized way before all of europe , i guess when vedas were written most of the europe was a jungle and ppl there still lived in the jungles .... 

[micxas]

okasaari, sanskrit origin ani google cheyyandi..adhi non indian ani vasthunayi links loo..adhe artham kavatle naaaku..

li8 teesko man, google wont prove anything :)

[ChampakDas]

This discredited not only the 'Vedas' but the genealogies of the 'Puranas' and their long list of the kings before the Buddha or Krishna were left without any historical basis. The 'Mahabharata', instead of a civil war in which all the main kings of India participated as it is described, became a local skirmish among petty princes that was later exaggerated by poets. In short, it discredited the most of the Hindu tradition and almost all its ancient literature. It turned its scriptures and sages into fantacies and exaggerations.

This served a social, political and economical purpose of domination, proving the superiority of Western culture and religion. It made the Hindus feel that their culture was not the great thing that their sages and ancestors had said it was. It made Hindus feel ashamed of their culture that its basis was neither historical nor scientific. It made them feel that the main line of civilization was developed first in the Middle East and then in Europe and that the culture of India was peripheral and secondary to the real development of world culture.

Such a view is not good scholarship or archeology but merely cultural imperialism. The Western Vedic scholars did in the intellectual spehere what the British army did in the political realm discredit, divide and conquer the Hindus. In short, the compelling reasons for the Aryan invasion theory were neither literary nor archeological but political and religious that is to say, not scholarship but prejudice. Such prejudice may not have been intentional but deep-seated political and religious views easily cloud and blur our thinking.

It is unfortunate that this this approach has not been questioned more, particularly by Hindus. Even though Indian Vedic scholars like Dayananda saraswati, Bal Gangadhar Tilak and Arobindo rejected it, most Hindus today passively accept it. They allow Western, generally Christian, scholars to interpret their history for them and quite naturally Hinduism is kept in a reduced role. Many Hindus still accept, read or even honor the translations of the 'Vedas' done by such Christian missionary scholars as Max Muller, Griffith, MonierWilliams and H. H. Wilson. Would modern Christians accept an interpretation of the Bible or Biblical history done by Hindus aimed at converting them to Hinduism? Universities in India also use the Western history books and Western Vedic translations that propound such views that denigrate their own culture and country.

http://www.hindunet.org/hindu_history/ancient/aryan/aryan_frawley.html

 

 

i read it long time ago bhaiyya , while reading abt aryan invasion ...... indaka search chesa fr that source but couldnt find it ..

 

[ChampakDas]

hmm this could be a reason but who knows antha maayaaa

probably because the westerners are unable to digest the fact that Indian subcontinent was civilized way before all of europe , i guess when vedas were written most of the europe was a jungle and ppl there still lived in the jungles .... 

 

[ChampakDas]

everyone has their own interpretation dude but no one knows the fact...

below is something that I found

The theory is that Indo-European [the ancestor of both Sanskrit and the language in which you posed your question] was originally spoken in an area which is now southern Russia. Some of the tribes moved west - giving rise to the modern European languages - and some moved east, towards iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan and India - remember the countries did not have those names many thousands of years ago - and their branch of the language family is known as Indo-Iranian - Indic , which includes Vedic Sanskrit, and Iranian, which you will gather is spoken in Iran.

okasaari, sanskrit origin ani google cheyyandi..adhi non indian ani vasthunayi links loo..adhe artham kavatle naaaku..

 

[micxas]

:3D_Smiles: , telisinde bro.. Max muller was a crap who had been belittling indian vedic soceity and its history in those books *7*^during his time .. Single point agenda, west gave birth 2 everything..

This discredited not only the 'Vedas' but the genealogies of the 'Puranas' and their long list of the kings before the Buddha or Krishna were left without any historical basis. The 'Mahabharata', instead of a civil war in which all the main kings of India participated as it is described, became a local skirmish among petty princes that was later exaggerated by poets. In short, it discredited the most of the Hindu tradition and almost all its ancient literature. It turned its scriptures and sages into fantacies and exaggerations.

This served a social, political and economical purpose of domination, proving the superiority of Western culture and religion. It made the Hindus feel that their culture was not the great thing that their sages and ancestors had said it was. It made Hindus feel ashamed of their culture that its basis was neither historical nor scientific. It made them feel that the main line of civilization was developed first in the Middle East and then in Europe and that the culture of India was peripheral and secondary to the real development of world culture.

Such a view is not good scholarship or archeology but merely cultural imperialism. The Western Vedic scholars did in the intellectual spehere what the British army did in the political realm discredit, divide and conquer the Hindus. In short, the compelling reasons for the Aryan invasion theory were neither literary nor archeological but political and religious that is to say, not scholarship but prejudice. Such prejudice may not have been intentional but deep-seated political and religious views easily cloud and blur our thinking.

It is unfortunate that this this approach has not been questioned more, particularly by Hindus. Even though Indian Vedic scholars like Dayananda saraswati, Bal Gangadhar Tilak and Arobindo rejected it, most Hindus today passively accept it. They allow Western, generally Christian, scholars to interpret their history for them and quite naturally Hinduism is kept in a reduced role. Many Hindus still accept, read or even honor the translations of the 'Vedas' done by such Christian missionary scholars as Max Muller, Griffith, MonierWilliams and H. H. Wilson. Would modern Christians accept an interpretation of the Bible or Biblical history done by Hindus aimed at converting them to Hinduism? Universities in India also use the Western history books and Western Vedic translations that propound such views that denigrate their own culture and country.

 

[hatersloveme]

aunu ani antaru

[vagaru]

probably because the westerners are unable to digest the fact that Indian subcontinent was civilized way before all of europe , i guess when vedas were written most of the europe was a jungle and ppl there still lived in the jungles .... 

 

 

could be, but they are saying it originated in europe, they are saying it originated in IRAN.

[vagaru]

hammayya, Vedas manave  anta man.. eee video loo mana indian athanu baaga explain chesaadu.. happy now.. aa badcow European gallu manavi kuda manavi kaadhu ani prove chesthaniki baaga try chesthurru.. faltu naa kodukuluu

 

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J63Udr_cuaA

[ChampakDas]

@3$%

hammayya, Vedas manave  anta man.. eee video loo mana indian athanu baaga explain chesaadu.. happy now.. aa badcow European gallu manavi kuda manavi kaadhu ani prove chesthaniki baaga try chesthurru.. faltu naa kodukuluu

 

[donganaaK]

hammayya, Vedas manave  anta man.. eee video loo mana indian athanu baaga explain chesaadu.. happy now.. aa badcow European gallu manavi kuda manavi kaadhu ani prove chesthaniki baaga try chesthurru.. faltu naa kodukuluu

 

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J63Udr_cuaA

 

lol

[vagaru]

@3$%

 

 

auvnu man, it is very important (definitely for me) man.. it is the question of our existence and religion. I am happy now.  morning nuchi watching related video's :).

[ChampakDas]

nen vekirinchatledu...bagundi ani telling  @3$%  I like you brother

auvnu man, it is very important (definitely for me) man.. it is the question of our existence and religion. I am happy now.  morning nuchi watching related video's :).

 

[vagaru]

lol

 

 

that video was form jan 204.. mana india vaallu ippudippudu antha research chesi video's vesthurruu.. lekhapothe ee European naa kodukulu rechipotharuu.. Sanskrit manadhii...

[vagaru]

nen vekirinchatledu...bagundi ani telling  @3$%  I like you brother

 

 

 

:)