Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

India is an economic and political union.

 

can one exist without the other? Eurozone is a failed example of an economic union without a political one. 

 

Is there a need for an UNION???

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • killer99

    17

  • lolbob_fan

    13

  • Breaker

    8

  • Bairagi From Bapatla

    6

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

adhey ardham aindhi

 

your questions must be more descriptive if you are looking for a particular answer.

Posted

cheppu baa endhi pilichav... nuvventi appude lechi start chesesava?

Posted

Is there a need for an UNION???

 

 

Already Mazdoor Union undi kada?

Posted

Is there a need for an UNION???

 

its up for debate. 

 

personally, since India has a long shared history, I think its the moral duty of southern Indian states (all of which have coastal access) to fund growth in poorer northern states.

 

The only thing I don't like is that the capital is in Delhi. and not in Hyd or Blr.

Posted

Already Mazdoor Union undi kada?

endhadhi

Posted

other people's hypocrisy is not an excuse for lack of argumentation.

 

I am just asking who are they to tell if psycopk is right or wrong when they do not have rational ideologies to start with

Posted

Is there a need for an UNION???

 

short answer. yes. There's a need.

 

There's also a need for states to have greater autonomy.

 

India's federal model is highly restrictive.

Posted

cheppu baa endhi pilichav... nuvventi appude lechi start chesesava?

pls don't spam w9Tbc-.gif

 

 count cheddamani enta mandi unnaro

Posted

I am just asking who are they to tell if psycopk is right or wrong when they do not have rational ideologies to start with

 

I agree. Pyscopk wasn't wrong in denouncing India. I just wish he didn't have that much hatred in his posts.

 

One can make perfectly logical arguments to secede from india. and also to remain in India.

Posted

pls don't spam w9Tbc-.gif

 

 count cheddamani enta mandi unnaro

ohh dat aaa? lunch ayyinda

Posted

its up for debate. 

 

personally, since India has a long shared history, I think its the moral duty of southern Indian states (all of which have coastal access) to fund growth in poorer northern states.

 

The only thing I don't like is that the capital is in Delhi. and not in Hyd or Blr.

 

yup. central govt lo south states ki enthaina say thakkuva. why do they need to stick to INDIA when they be better of being an Independent country???

 

separate state untey manchidhi aney concept tho states divide ayinappudu, why shld the country stay together??

 

personally, it is just not about one being better off. It is "us" as a country and states shld grow but half cooked selfish seperatist theory ni KCR and few lafangis support chesaru. as a result one is better off but the other is suffering. IS this what is called INDIA?? I do not disagree that there weren't any problems but lafangi's solution is not the only solution. but these same mindfucks now talking about INDIA is funny. thats my opinion bro. u have all rights to disagree.

Posted

short answer. yes. There's a need.

 

There's also a need for states to have greater autonomy.

 

India's federal model is highly restrictive.

 

 

agreed with red.

 

but why do they need an UNION?? I am just trying to understand bro. 

Posted

ledhu vandukovali

oh ok... ratri biryani em migaledha?

×
×
  • Create New...