KillChillPandey Posted April 5, 2015 Report Posted April 5, 2015 not completely, but I know the gist of what he says. I agree with him. better to meet people, than stick to books. find him more intriguing..after reading his work freedom from the known i found myself a bit detached to the world and its belief's..His videos on Love, Religion, hatred, attachment, war, freedom are the central part of his philosophy.. He goes into minute details on why we behave in a certain pattern.. Find him as an extraordinary philosopher born ahead of his times..
micxas Posted April 5, 2015 Report Posted April 5, 2015 find him more intriguing..after reading his work freedom from the known i found myself a bit detached to the world and its belief's..His videos on Love, Religion, hatred, attachment, war, freedom are the central part of his philosophy.. He goes into minute details on why we behave in a certain pattern.. Find him as an extraordinary philosopher born ahead of his times.. Okay..
Doola Posted April 5, 2015 Report Posted April 5, 2015 boring story that leads to sex. mani lekka screenplay add chesi interesting ga cheppu man. nee story telling techniques bytaki thy
lazybugger Posted April 5, 2015 Author Report Posted April 5, 2015 find him more intriguing..after reading his work freedom from the known i found myself a bit detached to the world and its belief's..His videos on Love, Religion, hatred, attachment, war, freedom are the central part of his philosophy.. He goes into minute details on why we behave in a certain pattern.. Find him as an extraordinary philosopher born ahead of his times.. I wish I can talk more about this. But, I barely remember reading J Krishnamurthy. Because by the time, I discovered him, I was already tired of philosophy itself. I distinctly remember that the problem with Krishnamoorthy was, while he was definitely brilliant, his work was mostly standalone, and was deriving from Indian literature, and daily life in India than any solid theoretical thesis, as is with western philosophy.
vaade_veedu Posted April 5, 2015 Report Posted April 5, 2015 I dont think so man..eppudu edho telivi ekkuva ayyi kani we can say one of the pioneer in TFI... Useless fellow vadu pioneer enti
pythonic Posted April 5, 2015 Report Posted April 5, 2015 Useless fellow vadu pioneer enti Emi chesadu man...go back to pre-satya era...eppudu konchem ekkuva ayyindi le...but manam past marava kudadhu kada...
KillChillPandey Posted April 5, 2015 Report Posted April 5, 2015 I wish I can talk more about this. But, I barely remember reading J Krishnamurthy. Because by the time, I discovered him, I was already tired of philosophy itself. I distinctly remember that the problem with Krishnamoorthy was, while he was definitely brilliant, his work was mostly standalone, and was deriving from Indian literature, and daily life in India than any solid theoretical thesis, as is with western philosophy. He was never in India apart from few years in childhood. His philosophy has less influence of Indian literature. Was under guidance of mostly best theologist of the world during that time. Even Socrates or any other great philosophers don't have solid thesis to base their context of work.
Guest Mahesh_Fan1 Posted April 5, 2015 Report Posted April 5, 2015 RGV gadu kuda nee lantode ra galeez yedhava....
keerthi1990 Posted April 5, 2015 Report Posted April 5, 2015 kaani. he sucks at bringing those type of characters on screen. only Naach lo techaadu, but it came off as quite silly. that a$$hole is more inspired by the film Godfather than Ayn Rand. Maniratnam has shown more Ayn Rand characters on screen. 1. kannathil Muthamittal (Telugu version what name?) Madhavan's character was directly lifted from the book Fountain Head. He even says a few dialogues that literal translations of what's written in the book. 2. Raavanan - First scene where Vikram jumps from top of a cliff into the water is the same as the opening scene Ayn Rand has written in the Fountain Head. 3. Yuva - Ajay Devgan's character. I doubt maniratnam read Ayn Rand before 2000. His movies before that look a little less polished, and aren't character driven. I wished Maniratnam never had read Ayn Rand. It seems to have fcuked his movies, like it fcuked my life for a short period. 3rd one is wrong yuva inspired from george reddy pdsu founder
lazybugger Posted April 5, 2015 Author Report Posted April 5, 2015 He was never in India apart from few years in childhood. His philosophy has less influence of Indian literature. Was under guidance of mostly best theologist of the world during that time. Even Socrates or any other great philosophers don't have solid thesis to base their context of work. Okay I thought he was referencing Indian literature. But his work doesn't seem to be aligned with western philosophies too.
lazybugger Posted April 5, 2015 Author Report Posted April 5, 2015 3rd one is wrong yuva inspired from george reddy pdsu founder its not wrong. one character can be inspired from a 1000 different sources. incorporating little aspects from each one of them.
.thumb.jpg.ce42bb16ec102475a78c2087ce269c7d.jpg)
.thumb.gif.343fe49c7e1c507ae0056326bd8cf77e.gif)
Recommended Posts