Jump to content

Balochistan India Tho Kalustham Ani Ante Nehru Gade Vaddu Annadu Anta


Recommended Posts

Posted

If anything, i have very high respect and admiration for Raw
I dont know how u came to a conclusion

 

nee comments alage unnai mari :)

lucky that nuvu isi ni praise cheya ledu nuvu :)

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • siru

    8

  • donganaaK

    7

  • athletics

    5

  • suryausa

    4

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

no bro. this was the situation in 1947. nizam wanted to merge with pak. but telangana was hindu majority who wanted to be india. nizam created a armed force called RAZAKARS. these razakars have massacred several hindus and patel was urging nehru to take action. but nehru is a true congi and refused to do anything. one day some razakars gangraped an elite old british woman in hyd and due to pressure from britain nehru said yes and patel did the rest.

read about razakars. the commander in razakars found the party MIM.


Don't twist the facts man, Nizam wanted independent country and not merge with pak, razakars is formed by his deputy qasim rizvi who is a radical. Razakars is more or less miltia and different from nizam army which has Hindus, Sikhs, christian soldiers along with Muslim soldiers. Since hyd was a independent princely state ruled by nizams for 200 years and you can't find fault that he turned down Indian unions request to accede.. Neither Nehru and Patel are wrong in this case, it is just perception, would you walk out of home without protect if Indian government asks for it?
Posted

no bro. this was the situation in 1947. nizam wanted to merge with pak. but telangana was hindu majority who wanted to be india. nizam created a armed force called RAZAKARS. these razakars have massacred several hindus and patel was urging nehru to take action. but nehru is a true congi and refused to do anything. one day some razakars gangraped an elite old british woman in hyd and due to pressure from britain nehru said yes and patel did the rest.

 

read about razakars. the commander in razakars found the party MIM. 

 

dint knw about the rape story but razakars showed all their might on petty people , when indian govt decided to intervene they knew they wouldnt stand a chance and most of them abandoned and ran away , they dint even try to putup a fight , the whole thing was literally a cakewalk for the indian army .... 

Posted

nee comments alage unnai mari :)
lucky that nuvu isi ni praise cheya ledu nuvu :)

Naa comments ni alaga understand cheskunte nenu em chesta
Mossad thoti polchithe compliment kavali kani negative etla ayindi?

Btw, mossad is the most feared intelligence agency of israel
Posted

padkunna man but less than 3hrs lo melkuva vachesindi ... have to sleep agn @3$%

 

db ki nee contribution chala vundi buddy i mean in a positive tone cheptunna

Posted

Don't twist the facts man, Nizam wanted independent country and not merge with pak, razakars is formed by his deputy qasim rizvi who is a radical. Razakars is more or less miltia and different from nizam army which has Hindus, Sikhs, christian soldiers along with Muslim soldiers. Since hyd was a independent princely state ruled by nizams for 200 years and you can't find fault that he turned down Indian unions request to accede.. Neither Nehru and Patel are wrong in this case, it is just perception, would you walk out of home without protect if Indian government asks for it?

Ok, then why did nizam transfer huge amount to pakistan?
Posted

antha ledu le man , its kinda overhyped , pichollu ankunnava migilnollu antha india madhyalo unna territory teeskelli pak chethiki ivvataniki ...... ah position lo evaru unna same result ..... 

 

evarunna kalavaniche varu kademo but razakars ni matram patel  baga anichesadu 

Posted

evarunna kalavaniche varu kademo but razakars ni matram patel baga anichesadu

Mana pelli eppudu ?
Posted

no bro. this was the situation in 1947. nizam wanted to merge with pak. but telangana was hindu majority who wanted to be india. nizam created a armed force called RAZAKARS. these razakars have massacred several hindus and patel was urging nehru to take action. but nehru is a true congi and refused to do anything. one day some razakars gangraped an elite old british woman in hyd and due to pressure from britain nehru said yes and patel did the rest.

 

read about razakars. the commander in razakars found the party MIM. 

 

 song 'bandi yenaka bandi katti' from mana bhoomi ade story kada

Posted

Punjab tried very hard to seperate frm india..
Didnt suceed..
Anyway, i dont know if baluchistan was ever meant to be part of india but we have to sirze the opportunity now to help liberate baluchistan..
Geographically it is in the ideal location for us to connect to middle east
No more at the mercy of paki to have a oil pipeline

The days of conquering are long over...India is neither aggressive nor want remotely what you said, even during the Bangladesh crisis it is more of a bluff that Pakistan fell for, also the bangla war is fought and won by mukti bahini than Indian soldiers although India took the whole credit.
Posted

dint knw about the rape story but razakars showed all their might on petty people , when indian govt decided to intervene they knew they wouldnt stand a chance and most of them abandoned and ran away , they dint even try to putup a fight , the whole thing was literally a cakewalk for the indian army ....


Google operation polo..a lot of Muslims were killed by Indian army and that is the reason why to date they don't for any other party than MIM
Posted

Punjab tried very hard to seperate frm india..
Didnt suceed..
Anyway, i dont know if baluchistan was ever meant to be part of india but we have to sirze the opportunity now to help liberate baluchistan..
Geographically it is in the ideal location for us to connect to middle east
No more at the mercy of paki to have a oil pipeline

 

 

i knw but u cant really compare balochisthan to punjab in this aspect .... hypothetially if we were to deal with a similar situation with balochisthan , it would be next to impossible for us to keep everything together  .

 

yeah but its not so easy , pakis will easily crush any agitation with the might of their army , basically the'll do the same thing that we did with punjab ...

 

and yeah geographically its in the ideal location and also the whole reason why US is being so partial to PAK is mainly because of its geographical advantage ( just so that they can have their bases close to the middle east and afghanisthan ) 

Posted

Ok, then why did nizam transfer huge amount to pakistan?


As per officials records it was done by then nizam official with out the knowledge of nizam and on that reason UK court decided the case in fovor of Indian government this month.
Posted

Google operation polo..a lot of Muslims were killed by Indian army and that is the reason why to date they don't for any other party than MIM

 

that was after the siege , i was saying that the razakars dint put up any fight with the army during the annexation ,

 

basically the razakars were more like a bunch of clowns when compared to the indian army ...

Posted

Google operation polo..a lot of Muslims were killed by Indian army and that is the reason why to date they don't for any other party than MIM

 

so which is worse? Andhra hegemony on Telangana people or Andhra+Telangana's hegemony on muslims in a city that muslims built? :)

×
×
  • Create New...