Tap Chesam Accepted By Tg Govt, Public Order Kosam Tapping Chestaranta

[rajurocking50]

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/hyderabad/Phones-tapped-to-maintain-public-order-says-Telangana-to-HC/articleshow/48258702.cms

 

HYDERABAD: The TRS government on Tuesday filed two petitions in the Hyderabad High Court seeking the quashing of the order of the Vijayawada metropolitan court which had directed four telecom service providers to give call data details of certain telephones to the Andhra Pradesh CID and SIT. 

The 'lawful interception' was done to maintain public order and the Vijayawada court has no jurisdiction over Telangana, it said. 

Days after the Telangana ACB registered the cash-for-vote case, the AP CID registered the phone-tapping case based on complaints that the phones of Andhra Pradesh chief minister Chandrababu Naidu and several ministers were tapped by Telangana intelligence officials. 

After the Vijayawada court directed BSNL, Airtel, Idea and Reliance to provide the call data details of the phones to the AP CID, the telecom companies moved the Supreme Court which directed them to provide the call details to the Vijayawada court in a 'sealed' cover and asked the latter to keep it that way for a month. In the meantime, the concerned parties can seek redressal from the Hyderabad High Court, the apex court ruled. 

In its petitions filed in the high court on Tuesday, Telangana said the "court of III additional chief metropolitan court, Vijayawada, has no jurisdiction in respect of state of Telangana." It added: "The impugned orders are not only arbitrary, illegal, without jurisdiction and in breach of the provisions of Sec 5 (2) of Indian Telegraph Act and section 123, 124 and 131 of Indian Evidence Act read with section 91 of the CrPC." 

Telangana contended that the "disclosure of lawful interception correspondence on the flimsiest pretext of illegal phone-tapping would only boost anti-state and anti-national activists besides endangering the lives of those involved in curbing such illegal activities." The lawful interception was done to maintain public order, it said. 

While one of the petitions named the Union home ministry, Department of Telecommunications, AP CID, and the four service providers as respondents, the second petition substituted AP CID with AP SIT in the list of respondents. 

 

Tap chesam accepted by TG govt, public order kosam tapping chestaranta mla,mp's,ministers,govt officials phones ni tap chesaru anta

 

[solman]

sunkara aunty video pls on this issue 

[ChandraSekharCherukuri]

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/hyderabad/Phones-tapped-to-maintain-public-order-says-Telangana-to-HC/articleshow/48258702.cms

 

HYDERABAD: The TRS government on Tuesday filed two petitions in the Hyderabad High Court seeking the quashing of the order of the Vijayawada metropolitan court which had directed four telecom service providers to give call data details of certain telephones to the Andhra Pradesh CID and SIT. 

The 'lawful interception' was done to maintain public order and the Vijayawada court has no jurisdiction over Telangana, it said. 

Days after the Telangana ACB registered the cash-for-vote case, the AP CID registered the phone-tapping case based on complaints that the phones of Andhra Pradesh chief minister Chandrababu Naidu and several ministers were tapped by Telangana intelligence officials. 

After the Vijayawada court directed BSNL, Airtel, Idea and Reliance to provide the call data details of the phones to the AP CID, the telecom companies moved the Supreme Court which directed them to provide the call details to the Vijayawada court in a 'sealed' cover and asked the latter to keep it that way for a month. In the meantime, the concerned parties can seek redressal from the Hyderabad High Court, the apex court ruled. 

In its petitions filed in the high court on Tuesday, Telangana said the "court of III additional chief metropolitan court, Vijayawada, has no jurisdiction in respect of state of Telangana." It added: "The impugned orders are not only arbitrary, illegal, without jurisdiction and in breach of the provisions of Sec 5 (2) of Indian Telegraph Act and section 123, 124 and 131 of Indian Evidence Act read with section 91 of the CrPC." 

Telangana contended that the "disclosure of lawful interception correspondence on the flimsiest pretext of illegal phone-tapping would only boost anti-state and anti-national activists besides endangering the lives of those involved in curbing such illegal activities." The lawful interception was done to maintain public order, it said. 

While one of the petitions named the Union home ministry, Department of Telecommunications, AP CID, and the four service providers as respondents, the second petition substituted AP CID with AP SIT in the list of respondents. 

 

Tap chesam accepted by TG govt, public order kosam tapping chestaranta mla,mp's,ministers,govt officials phones ni tap chesaru anta

ante eadni koncham clear ga cheppu 

 

ala cheste, PM phone ayina Tap cheyocha 

[gummadikaaya]

s

[puli_keka]

Lol

[Chitti_Robo_Rebuilt]

New topic kukka ki bokka dorikindi loll

[Roger_that]

lol pulkas

[puli_keka]

New topic kukka ki bokka dorikindi loll

Repo ellundo arrest confirmed anta ga.. Tapping proofs vachesai bye1 bye1

[athletics]

That doesn't mean cash for vote tapping but something legally intercepted as per the TRAI guilines of some individuals. What TS is arguing is that they are legally bound and can't reveal the confidential information which is none of vijaywada courts issue as it is not under their jurisdiction.

[ChandraSekharCherukuri]

Repo ellundo arrest confirmed anta ga.. Tapping proofs vachesai bye1 bye1

CBN ni ,mana Nayini 1 day lo lopala 10gutha annadu ga 

CBN tappinchukoledu we got all proofs ani cheppadu ga 
eeapudu arrest chesthunaru :(

 

[SeemaLekka]

CBN ni ,mana Nayini 1 day lo lopala 10gutha annadu ga
CBN tappinchukoledu we got all proofs ani cheppadu ga
eeapudu arrest chesthunaru :(

[ChandraSekharCherukuri]

That doesn't mean cash for vote tapping but something legally intercepted as per the TRAI guilines of some individuals. What TS is arguing is that they are legally bound and can't reveal the confidential information which is none of vijaywada courts issue as it is not under their jurisdiction.

Teliyaka asking, future lo PM phone kuda tap cheste 

Delhi court order cheste, we can;t reveal confidential info because,delhi is not in TG juristriction ani cheppocha ? 

:(

[Chitti_Robo_Rebuilt]

Repo ellundo arrest confirmed anta ga.. Tapping proofs vachesai bye1 bye1

Evarini KCR naa CBN naa modi naa mod naa ninna nanna

[ChandraSekharCherukuri]

 

CBN ni ,mana Nayini 1 day lo lopala 10gutha annadu ga
CBN tappinchukoledu we got all proofs ani cheppadu ga
eeapudu arrest chesthunaru :(
 

 

CBN ni  eeapudu lopal 10guthunaru 

:(

 

[dotnetrockz]

So if they are gonna take action on those who tapped are they also gonna take same action on the person involved in cash for vote?

Either do both or do nothing