Opt News

[always_happy116]

Valla goal ee adi emo..anduke they are trying to come up with such stringent proposals...

 

USA ki evadu ravadhu appudu telisi vasthadii villaku

[sandie]

Too Bad.. this shouldn't happen

[Roger_that]

H4 aunty. mogudu H1 applyc hesadu pick aindi approve aindi.. memu emo 3yrs nundi G denginchukuntunnam 

@$MN  @$MN  @$MN

[Keerthana]

http://immigration-law.com

 

For the foregoing reasons, the Court will grant in part and deny in part both plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 25] and defendant’s motion for summary judgment [ECF No. 27]. The Court will vacate the 17-month STEM extension described in the 2008 Rule, 73 Fed. Reg. 18,944 (Apr. 8, 2008), staying the vacatur until February 12, 2016, and will remand to DHS for further proceedings consistent with this Memorandum Opinion. An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion will be issued on this day.

 

 

What does this mean?

 

[dappusubhani]

yeah girl kabatti aa chance undi.. abbailaku papam :( ippudu Masters chese valla parisithi ento :3D_Smiles_38: :3D_Smiles_38:

 

avunu bro.. na frnd okadu calif lo oka kufli univ ki vachhaadu.. vaadu weekly 4 tiems call chesi nannu tintunnadu.. career ela ani :P

[ronitreddy]

yeah girl kabatti aa chance undi.. abbailaku papam :( ippudu Masters chese valla parisithi ento :3D_Smiles_38: :3D_Smiles_38:

H1B ammayini cheskuntaru emo..Age factor pothadi emo igaaa

[always_happy116]

avunu bro.. na frnd okadu calif lo oka kufli univ ki vachhaadu.. vaadu weekly 4 tiems call chesi nannu tintunnadu.. career ela ani :P

 

yeah aa rule 2012 lo amalu anta.. so ee december ki entha mandi graduate avutharo aina vallaku extension undadu emo kada :O

[SeemaLekka]

calling db immigration lawyers to brief

[always_happy116]

H1B ammayini cheskuntaru emo..Age factor pothadi emo igaaa

 

H1B ammai ante easy ga abbai kante 3yrs pedhadi untadi :O

[Roger_that]

idi true news ye na ronit please confirm

[Keerthana]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

WASHINGTON ALLIANCE OF TECHNOLOGY WORKERS,

Plaintiff, v.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,

Defendant.

Civil Action No. 14-529 (ESH)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff Washington Alliance of Technology Workers, a collective-bargaining organization that represents science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (“STEM”) workers, has sued the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”). Plaintiff challenges an interim final rule promulgated by defendant DHS in April 2008 extending, for eligible STEM students, the duration of optional practical training (“OPT”), which allows nonimmigrant foreign nationals on an F-1 student visa to engage in employment during and after completing a course of study at a U.S. educational institution. See 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(f)(10)(ii). Before this Court are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. (Pl.’s Cross Mot. for Summ. Judgment or Judgment on the Administrative Record [ECF No. 25] (“Pl.’s Mot.”)); Def.’s Mot. for Summ. Judgment [ECF No. 27] (“Def.’s Mot.”).) For the following reasons, both motions will be granted in part and denied in part.

\

 

[k2s]

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

WASHINGTON ALLIANCE OF TECHNOLOGY WORKERS,

Plaintiff, v.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,

Defendant.

Civil Action No. 14-529 (ESH)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff Washington Alliance of Technology Workers, a collective-bargaining organization that represents science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (“STEM”) workers, has sued the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”). Plaintiff challenges an interim final rule promulgated by defendant DHS in April 2008 extending, for eligible STEM students, the duration of optional practical training (“OPT”), which allows nonimmigrant foreign nationals on an F-1 student visa to engage in employment during and after completing a course of study at a U.S. educational institution. See 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(f)(10)(ii). Before this Court are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. (Pl.’s Cross Mot. for Summ. Judgment or Judgment on the Administrative Record [ECF No. 25] (“Pl.’s Mot.”)); Def.’s Mot. for Summ. Judgment [ECF No. 27] (“Def.’s Mot.”).) For the following reasons, both motions will be granted in part and denied in part.

\

 

here is the full court notice/doc 

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_6gbFPjVDoxYXJxRENZYzAydUk/edit?pli=1

[SeemaLekka]

idi true news ye na ronit please confirm

 

[Keerthana]

FEB 2016 varku they will give chance to rectify it..its not finalized

[Keerthana]

what's going to happen then?