Newsflash! Exciting Change May Be Coming To Visa Bulletin Process

[vasu123]

i140 ayipoyaka EAD apply daggara employers delay cheyadaniki emi undadu annadu ma friend, vadu ala cheyalanukunte  GC process start cheyadame late ga chestadu or perm approve ayyaka  i140 filing appudu 6 months varaku wait chesi chestadu annadu, but EAD filing daggara late chese chances thakkuva annadu.  

 

if vadu i140 withdraw chestha na mata vinakapothe ani inko 1 yr tarvatha EAD filing cheddam ani ante manam uscis ki complaint ela file cheyyagalam any suggestions?  atu itu ayithe vadu i140 withdraw chesukunte manaku chala pedha bokka kada, so sensitive issue, ela handle cheyyali?

P.S. nakithe employer tho elanti arguements jaragaledu so far., ala ani vaditho antha pedha touch kooda ledu, always i work with HR about GC process. desi mestri ne ma vadu.

[BARMANI]

AP ante ?

[Sreemanthudu]

i140 ayipoyaka EAD apply daggara employers delay cheyadaniki emi undadu annadu ma friend, vadu ala cheyalanukunte  GC process start cheyadame late ga chestadu or perm approve ayyaka  i140 filing appudu 6 months varaku wait chesi chestadu annadu, but EAD filing daggara late chese chances thakkuva annadu.  

 

if vadu i140 withdraw chestha na mata vinakapothe ani inko 1 yr tarvatha EAD filing cheddam ani ante manam uscis ki complaint ela file cheyyagalam any suggestions?  atu itu ayithe vadu i140 withdraw chesukunte manaku chala pedha bokka kada, so sensitive issue, ela handle cheyyali?

P.S. nakithe employer tho elanti arguements jaragaledu so far., ala ani vaditho antha pedha touch kooda ledu, always i work with HR about GC process. desi mestri ne.

 

meee frnd cheppindhi correct bro... but nuvvu aduguthunnadi ippudu changes vathe anna situation lo kada... 

usual ga i140 vachaka kuda we will stay with emplyer only for more than 5 yrs till we get EAD... but ippudu ventaneey EAD ichesthe...employer dagara undavu kada... vaadiki bokka kada... ala alochisthe employer may delay for filing EAD... 

 

nuvvu cheppinattu... GC late start cheyyadam, i140 late file cheyyadam enduku?? so that u will stay with that employer for a longer time aney gaa... 

[solman]

AP ante ?

Advance Parole

[k2s]

@3$%

[gandhi]

emundhi bro EAD + AP vasthe amendments and stampings gola pothadi that is the main advantage... malli sukhamga contracting chesukovachu..

And I guess you can start your own business too and work for it ( idi pakkaga teledu) 

 

End of the day work aithe cheyali anuko

 

f we have break in between jobs do we need to pay taxes

[Sreemanthudu]

@3$%

@3$% @3$%

[jpismahatma]

AP ante ?

 

 

andhra pradesh...

[solman]

H4 EAD on the way to Assam laga undhi gaa 

 

 

09/06/2015: Unfinished Court Business for Challenges to H-4 EAD Rule

• This reporter reminds the visitors to refer back our report on 09/03/2015 on potential impact of STEM OPT court fights on the H-4 EAD rule. There this reporter reminded the H-4 EAD stakeholders of unfinished business of the U.S. District Court in District of Columbia in dismissing the petitioner's motion, saving the H-4 EAD rule on the narrow issue. The court did not get to the decision of the merits of the lawsuit challenging Obama's authority to grant H-4 EAD without legislation.
• The American Immigration Council reports that the plaintiff indeed claims that the District Court should decide this unfinished claim. Reportedly, the plaintiff claims that only Congress can decide which visa categories may include work authorization. According to the plaintiff, Save Jobs, DHS can only issue regulations allowing work authorization for those categories Congress has already identified. As a prime example, Save Jobs points to the laws Congress passed in 2002 to authorize employment for L-2 spouses (spouses of certain nonimmigrants working for multinational companies (L-1s)) and E spouses (spouses of foreign nationals who also are benefiting the U.S. economy through trade, investment or highly-skilled employment under certain treaties the U.S. has entered (E-1, E-2 or E-3)). Save Jobs contends that DHS may only issue regulations authorizing H-4s to work if Congress explicitly authorizes H-4 spouses to work.
• The report indicates that indeed, on July 1, the court denied as premature the government’s motion to dismiss and Save Jobs’ motion for summary judgment (i.e., for a final decision as a matter of law). The parties now have until September 11 to each file a summary judgment motion with all responsive pleadings to be filed by October 16, 2015. Never ending court challenges by anti-foreign worker challengers' fights against the Obama Administration's effort to reform employment-based immigration system by executive power rather than legislation! Please stay tuned for this painful news of development.

[k2s]

@3$% @3$%

[Sreemanthudu]

andhra pradesh...

@3$% @3$%

[ronitreddy]

 

H4 EAD on the way to Assam laga undhi gaa 

 

 

09/06/2015: Unfinished Court Business for Challenges to H-4 EAD Rule

• This reporter reminds the visitors to refer back our report on 09/03/2015 on potential impact of STEM OPT court fights on the H-4 EAD rule. There this reporter reminded the H-4 EAD stakeholders of unfinished business of the U.S. District Court in District of Columbia in dismissing the petitioner's motion, saving the H-4 EAD rule on the narrow issue. The court did not get to the decision of the merits of the lawsuit challenging Obama's authority to grant H-4 EAD without legislation.
• The American Immigration Council reports that the plaintiff indeed claims that the District Court should decide this unfinished claim. Reportedly, the plaintiff claims that only Congress can decide which visa categories may include work authorization. According to the plaintiff, Save Jobs, DHS can only issue regulations allowing work authorization for those categories Congress has already identified. As a prime example, Save Jobs points to the laws Congress passed in 2002 to authorize employment for L-2 spouses (spouses of certain nonimmigrants working for multinational companies (L-1s)) and E spouses (spouses of foreign nationals who also are benefiting the U.S. economy through trade, investment or highly-skilled employment under certain treaties the U.S. has entered (E-1, E-2 or E-3)). Save Jobs contends that DHS may only issue regulations authorizing H-4s to work if Congress explicitly authorizes H-4 spouses to work.
• The report indicates that indeed, on July 1, the court denied as premature the government’s motion to dismiss and Save Jobs’ motion for summary judgment (i.e., for a final decision as a matter of law). The parties now have until September 11 to each file a summary judgment motion with all responsive pleadings to be filed by October 16, 2015. Never ending court challenges by anti-foreign worker challengers' fights against the Obama Administration's effort to reform employment-based immigration system by executive power rather than legislation! Please stay tuned for this painful news of development.

 

mari kondariki already approved kada..valla sangathi enti

[Sreemanthudu]

 

H4 EAD on the way to Assam laga undhi gaa 

 

 

09/06/2015: Unfinished Court Business for Challenges to H-4 EAD Rule

• This reporter reminds the visitors to refer back our report on 09/03/2015 on potential impact of STEM OPT court fights on the H-4 EAD rule. There this reporter reminded the H-4 EAD stakeholders of unfinished business of the U.S. District Court in District of Columbia in dismissing the petitioner's motion, saving the H-4 EAD rule on the narrow issue. The court did not get to the decision of the merits of the lawsuit challenging Obama's authority to grant H-4 EAD without legislation.
• The American Immigration Council reports that the plaintiff indeed claims that the District Court should decide this unfinished claim. Reportedly, the plaintiff claims that only Congress can decide which visa categories may include work authorization. According to the plaintiff, Save Jobs, DHS can only issue regulations allowing work authorization for those categories Congress has already identified. As a prime example, Save Jobs points to the laws Congress passed in 2002 to authorize employment for L-2 spouses (spouses of certain nonimmigrants working for multinational companies (L-1s)) and E spouses (spouses of foreign nationals who also are benefiting the U.S. economy through trade, investment or highly-skilled employment under certain treaties the U.S. has entered (E-1, E-2 or E-3)). Save Jobs contends that DHS may only issue regulations authorizing H-4s to work if Congress explicitly authorizes H-4 spouses to work.
• The report indicates that indeed, on July 1, the court denied as premature the government’s motion to dismiss and Save Jobs’ motion for summary judgment (i.e., for a final decision as a matter of law). The parties now have until September 11 to each file a summary judgment motion with all responsive pleadings to be filed by October 16, 2015. Never ending court challenges by anti-foreign worker challengers' fights against the Obama Administration's effort to reform employment-based immigration system by executive power rather than legislation! Please stay tuned for this painful news of development.

 

 

ante monna 18 month OPT cancel annatu... H4 EAD cancel antara ??

 

@3$% @3$% @3$%

[Sreemanthudu]

 

@3$% @3$%

 

 

REPORTED  :police:

[solman]

mari kondariki already approved kada..valla sangathi enti

 

 

antee inka emi order ivaledu kada court...

 

court H4 EAD ki against gaa order istee appudu H4 EAD's back tesukuntaru... Illegals ki ichina EAD's alage tesukunaru kada July/August lo..