Spine Chilling Story In Full: Nithari Case.

[JANASENA]

Nithari Case Full Story - Silver Mayya Itu Ra Adigav Ga Full Story 

 

:3D_Smiles_38:  :3D_Smiles_38:  :3D_Smiles_38:

 

 

Noida: D-5, Sector 31, Noida is the second last house on the street. The white building is abandoned. The drain-turned-road at the back of the house leads to Nithari, an urban village in Noida. There was nothing noticeable about that house unless two Nithari residents, in December 2006, claimed that they have seen the remains of the children in the drain behind the house, who had been missing since many days.

 

Reports of some children missing from Nithari turned into the most gruesome serial killings in India. While a number of reports were filed by anxious parents whose children have been missing from the village, many residents claimed that they had been repeatedly ignored by local authorities. So what if child after child went missing? They were poor, they belonged to that no-man’s-land called Nithari, where eking out a minimal living is hard enough and getting past a police stonewall is something superhuman.

 

On December 29, 2006, two Nithari residents claimed that they suspect Surender Koli, the domestic help at D5, had something to do with the disappearances of the children that went missing in two years. They sought help of former RWA President SC Mishra. Mishra and the two residents searched the tank drain, and one of the residents claimed to have found a decomposed hand, after which they called the police. Residents alleged that the police were corrupt. Moninder Singh Pandher, owner of the house, offered the police everything the parents of the missing children never could. He had wealth, powerful connections and free gifts to hand out. Some policemen, in turn, had powerful ‘Yadav’ connections.

 

Demands were made for an independent probe into the matter. One of the residents asserted that the police were claiming credit for discovering the bodies when it was the residents who dug them up. The police denied having found fifteen bodies. The victims’ identities and number could only be established with DNA tests. The police then sealed the house and did not allow news media anywhere near the scene of crime. The central government tried to ascertain the facts behind the discovery of the skeletal remains and whether it had ‘inter-state ramifications’.

 

December 30, 2006 - Moninder Singh Pandher and Surender Koli were detained for questioning in connection with the missing case of 20-year-old Payal. Payal went missing on May 7 and she was not the only one but many such cases had rocked the village in two years. After Koli's confession of having killed Payal after sexually assaulting her, police claimed to have started digging up the nearby land area and discovered the children’s bodies.

 

Notably, a FIR had been filed on October 7, 2006 about the missing 20-year-old Payal. Investigations revealed that Payal's cellphone was being used although the SIM card she owned remained inactive. A rickshaw cart puller affirmed that the phone belonged to someone from the Pandher residence. After the affirmation of the facts by the witness, Moninder Singh was called for interrogation, which subsequently revealed nothing. His aide and servant, Surender Koli was also picked up when he confessed killing the woman and dumping her body behind the house. The police started digging and henceforth recovered the skeletal remains of the missing children instead of Payal.

 

Nand Lal, the father of the girl – Deepika alias Payal, alleged that the police had threatened and harassed him. He stated that it was because of the court intervention that the police officers registered the FIR.

 

December 31, 2006 - Two policemen were suspended in connection with the serial murders as angry residents charged the house of the alleged mastermind Pandher. The constables were suspended for dereliction of duty in the wake of the allegations by the locals that the police had refused to take any action when they were informed about huge number of children missing from Nithari.

 

The situation at Nithari went worse after agitated mob fought pitched battles with the police, both pelting stones at each other, just outside the residence of the accused. The police had also detained a maid named Maya whom they suspected had a hand in procuring women for the businessman.

 

During primary investigations

 

January 1, 2007 - The remand magistrate granted the police custody of the two until January 10, 2007 as the investigators said that further interrogation was required to complete recovery of victims' remains. Police also conducted a raid on Pandher's Chandigarh residence. His wife and son were interrogated and questions were asked about Pandher's habits. However, there were reports that their relationship with him was ‘strained’, which were later found to be untrue.

 

January 2, 2007 – Fifteen out of the 17 skeletons discovered in the village were identified. Ten of them were identified by Koli when he was confronted with the photographs of the missing children. Five others were identified by family members after being shown belongings recovered from the scene. Police had said that there were at least 31 child victims. There were also speculations doing rounds in media that motivation of the killings can also be organ trade.

 

During the preliminary investigations, neither the courts nor the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) were involved.

 

The central government, however, had constituted a high-level inquiry committee to go into the police lapses. The then Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh, Mulayam Singh Yadav said that he would await the report of the committee looking into the issue before making the decision whether there should be a CBI probe into the matter. The inquiry committee that investigated the serial killings discovered serious lapses on the part of the police in handling the cases of missing persons. The reports were incriminating and claimed that the local police failed in their duty to respond to complaints over the past two years.

 

After four days of discourse and mounting pressure from the centre, the Uttar Pradesh government decided to hand over the inquiry to the CBI.

 

January 12, 2007 - The two accused were taken to the CBI headquarters in New Delhi, a day before the investigation was to be transferred to the CBI. The CBI continued its investigation and discovered three more skulls and human remains at the site of the serial killings.

 

Meanwhile, the investigators searched the drains outside the house and found three skulls, believed to be of the children and several body parts, including parts of legs, bones, and torso.

 

January 20, 2007 – Uttar Pradesh government submitted a report to the National Human Rights Commission.

 

February 8, 2007 – A special CBI court sent both the accused to 14 days custody of CBI.

 

February 12, 2007 – Human Rights Commission formed a committee to inquire the matter.

 

May 22, 2007 – CBI filed its first chargesheet in a Ghaziabad court in which main charges of kidnap, rape and murder were on Surender Koli.

 

May 1, 2008 – Family of three victims approached the court against CBI’s clean chit to Moninder Pandher.

 

May 11, 2008 – The court directed the CBI to probe Pandher’s role in the killings.

 

November 1, 2008 – The Supreme Court issued a notice to CBI after the complaint of relatives of one of the victims that CBI was trying to shield Pandher. 

 

 December 13, 2008 – A special CBI court in Ghaziabad framed charges of rape of two minors against Pandher.

 

February 12, 2009 - Both the accused—Moninder Singh Pandher and his domestic servant Surender Koli—were found guilty of the February 8, 2005 murder of Rimpa Haldar, 14, by a special sessions court in Ghaziabad.

 

February 13, 2009 - Pandher and Surender Koli were given the death sentence as the case was classified as ‘rarest of rare’.

 

September 10, 2009 - The Allahabad high court acquitted Moninder Singh Pandher and overturned his death sentence. He was not named a main suspect by investigators initially, but was summoned as co-accused during the trial. Pandher faces trial in five cases out of the remaining 12, and could be re-sentenced to death if found guilty in any of those killings.

 

May 4, 2010 - Koli was found guilty of October 25, 2006 murder of Arti Prasad, 7, and given a second death sentence eight days later.

 

September 27, 2010 - Koli was found guilty of the April 10, 2006 murder of Rachna Lal, 9, and given a third death sentence the following day.

 

December 22, 2010 - Koli was found guilty of the June 2006 murder of Deepali Sarkar, 12, and given a fourth death sentence.

 

February 15, 2011 – The Supreme Court upheld the death sentence of Surender Koli.

 

December 24, 2012 - Koli was found guilty of the June 4, 2005 murder of Chhoti Kavita, 5, and given a fifth death sentence.

 

 

 

When there was a suspicion of child pornography racket

 

During the investigations, erotic literature along with a laptop connected to a webcam was seized. It raised the apprehensions of an international child pornography racket. The police had also recovered some photographs of Pandher with nude children and foreigners. However, later during the investigation, it was found the nude children in the pictures were Pandher's grandchildren. There was no link found to child pornography.

 

 

 

 

When there was suspicion of organ trade and cannibalism

 

During the preliminary investigations, the police suspected an organ trade angle as the motive behind the murders. They raided the house of a doctor who lived in the neighbourhood of the primary accused. A team of officials and a team of forensic experts picked up possible evidence for tests.

 

Police later revealed that the doctor had been accused of a similar crime in 1998, although the court had absolved him the same year. There was a second raid a few days later. The police were however, cautious with the news reports suggesting the accused committed cannibalism even before the polygraph tests had barely begun.

 

There was a twist in the story after the discovery of several polythene bags containing parts of human torsos. It led the investigators to conclude that it was unlikely that the accused had links to illegal organ trade. The CBI team discovered the bags in the drains outside the Pandher residence.

 

After interrogating Surender Koli, they came to a prima facie conclusion that ‘he is a psychopath and used to carry out the killings’.

 

 

 

 

The victims

 

It may be recalled that Payal was the only adult victim in the string of the serial murders. Majority of the victims were young girls. Post mortem reports of the 17 set of skulls and bones that was recovered from the drain showed that 11 of the killed were girls.

 

The post mortem reports revealed that there had been a pattern in the killings. In a revelation made by AIIMS on February 6, 2007, it was also concluded that there were 19 skulls in all - 16 complete and 3 damaged. The bodies had been cut into three pieces before being disposed of by the servant Surender Koli. CBI sources said that the manservant, after strangling the victims, severed their heads and threw them in the drain behind the house of his employer.

 

 

 

The way ‘relevant’ questions were ‘ignored’ during the investigations

 

Commodore Lokesh Batra was present outside the house the day skeletons were recovered from the drain. Several questions troubled him: Wasn’t the Noida Authority (NA), the civic body, responsible for periodically cleaning it? How could they remain undiscovered for so long? Batra used the Right to Information law passed by Parliament a year back in 2005.

 

Armed with RTI, he asked the authority why the skeletons were not discovered by its officials. The NA replied that drains in Noida were cleaned every 15-30 days. It said the authority last cleaned the drain outside Koli and Pandher’s house between December 23 and 26—days before police found skeletons from it.

 

A committee set up by the Ministry of Women and Child Development to probe the killings also indicted NA. “In the Nithari case, if the administration had cleaned the sewerage system on a regular basis, bodies would have been discovered much earlier and probably some deaths prevented,” the report said.

 

Some boys playing cricket had found body parts much before police discovered them in the drain behind houses D-1 to D-17. The matter was reported. Police officers visiting the spot rejected the material found as animal carcasses. The first ever cleaning of the drain was done at least a year later, say residents.

 

In reply to Batra’s RTI, the Authority said waste from the drain was taken to its dumping ground in Sector 54. Neither the Noida Authority, nor Noida police or the CBI ever searched the dumpsite for remains. “If the authority had indeed cleaned the drain just six days before December 29, it made perfect sense to search the dumping ground,” says Batra.

 

The authority stopped replying to Batra’s RTI applications soon after.

 

 

 

 

 

Impact on village and villagers post Nithari killings

 

The villagers say that they were already not happy with the attitude of area police, but they are terrified after the Nithari massacre. Children in the village are not allowed to leave the house alone. Not only children but even adults are scared after the killings.

 

 

[Silver_mani]

idi kaadu mayya ...china pillodu killer gadu vuntadu kada ...vadi sisters ni champestadu anukunta ... I want that story 

[JANASENA]

idi kaadu mayya ...china pillodu killer gadu vuntadu kada ...vadi sisters ni champestadu anukunta ... I want that story 

 

 

Amarjeet Sada (sometimes referred to as ‘Amardeep’ Sada) is the world’s youngest known serial killer, having committed three murders at the age of 8. Amarjeet was born in 1998 to an impoverished family in Begusaray, Bihar, India; His father is a laborer in the village of Musahri. In 2006 Amarjeet murdered his 6 month old cousin, the daughter of a maternal uncle. Shortly after, he murdered his own 8 month old sister. While Amarjeet’s family and some villagers were aware of the child’s involvement in these two murders, they were considered “family matters” and went unreported. In 2007 Amarjeet killed again, this time a neighbor’s 6 month old daughter named Kushboo. Kushboo’s mother, Chunchun Devi, left her daughter at the village primary school to sleep while she tended to her chores. When she returned, her daughter was gone. Villagers who knew of Amarjeet’s past murders confronted him regarding Kushboo’s disappearance. Amarjeet, seemingly proud of his actions, happily recounted the gory tale of how he killed the infant. He then led villagers to the shallow grave he had dug for Kushboo. Amarjeet told police, “Khapda de mar mar ke sura deliyay” meaning “I killed by beating her with a brick”. He told police he had laid her down in the grass before beginning to smash her face with a brick, then covered the body in grass and leaves before returning to his home. Reportedly, all three murders were conducted in this manner. It is believed he also strangled his two previous victims, which may have been the cause of death prior to beating with a brick. Unfortunately, because his first two murders went unreported and there was no official investigation into them, details remain unclear. Police say, “He [Amarjeet] said he took the children to the fields and hit them with a stone and killed them. He has been charged with the murder [of Kushboo Devi].” Amarjeet was arrested on May 30, 2007 and “spoke little but smiled a lot” when asked about the murders. While being further questioned he, “Just smiled a lot and asked for biscuits.”

 Superintendent Amit Lodha, a resident of Begusarai (90 miles/145 kilometers east of Bihari, the capital of Patna) said Amarjeet Sada appeared to be a psychiatric case. He was evaluated by professionals and found to be suffering from a conduct disorder. Panta-based psychoanalyst Shamshad Hussain found that this conduct disorder causes Amardeep to behave in a sadistic manner. Due to a severe chemical imbalance in Sada’s brain, he receives a sense of gratification from inflicting injuries on others. A psychologist working on his case explained, “such aggression may be hereditary and may be caused because of great chemical upheavals in the brain.”. According to a former psychology professor at Patna University, Sada did not have a sense of right or wrong when he committed the murders due to his conduct disorder. It is believed with medication, levels of chemicals in his brain can be balanced. Ultimately, the boy was charged with murder and tried as a juvenile. Sada’s story lost steam for most of the world after that point so there is not much information available on what became of him. Although Amarjeet’s current status is “unknown”, we can assume from his graphic and proud confession, he was eventually charged with the murder. Since the boy was tried as a juvenile, in accordance to Indian law, he could not have been imprisoned any longer than three years. Due to his mental state at the time the crimes took place, it is possible he served his sentence in a psychiatric institute in lieu of a juvenile detention center. After his sentence had been served, it is also possible that his parents chose to keep him in a mental health facility; However, considering they did not seek mental health for him after either of the first two murders, it is unlikely he received more therapy than was required. Amarjeet Sada would be approximately 17 years old now (no exact date of birth available, only birth year) and more likely than not, a free young man. There are rumors he may have changed his name to ‘Samarjit’, which is common when young children commit a horrendous crime and are later rehabilitated. Hopefully Amarjeet Sada has been, and will continue to be able to manage his conduct disorder through therapy and medication and live a new life under a new name, scrutiny-free.
UPDATE: After writing this article I was contacted by Amarjeet Sada who claims he is currently living in a children’s home in India where he will remain until he is 18 years of age. No other details at this time.

[Silver_mani]

amarjith edo vundi peru ... 6 years ke murders chesadu ...that story

[JANASENA]

amarjith edo vundi peru ... 6 years ke murders chesadu ...that story

 

 

esa mama choodu

[Silver_mani]

 

Amarjeet Sada (sometimes referred to as ‘Amardeep’ Sada) is the world’s youngest known serial killer, having committed three murders at the age of 8. Amarjeet was born in 1998 to an impoverished family in Begusaray, Bihar, India; His father is a laborer in the village of Musahri. In 2006 Amarjeet murdered his 6 month old cousin, the daughter of a maternal uncle. Shortly after, he murdered his own 8 month old sister. While Amarjeet’s family and some villagers were aware of the child’s involvement in these two murders, they were considered “family matters” and went unreported. In 2007 Amarjeet killed again, this time a neighbor’s 6 month old daughter named Kushboo. Kushboo’s mother, Chunchun Devi, left her daughter at the village primary school to sleep while she tended to her chores. When she returned, her daughter was gone. Villagers who knew of Amarjeet’s past murders confronted him regarding Kushboo’s disappearance. Amarjeet, seemingly proud of his actions, happily recounted the gory tale of how he killed the infant. He then led villagers to the shallow grave he had dug for Kushboo. Amarjeet told police, “Khapda de mar mar ke sura deliyay” meaning “I killed by beating her with a brick”. He told police he had laid her down in the grass before beginning to smash her face with a brick, then covered the body in grass and leaves before returning to his home. Reportedly, all three murders were conducted in this manner. It is believed he also strangled his two previous victims, which may have been the cause of death prior to beating with a brick. Unfortunately, because his first two murders went unreported and there was no official investigation into them, details remain unclear. Police say, “He [Amarjeet] said he took the children to the fields and hit them with a stone and killed them. He has been charged with the murder [of Kushboo Devi].” Amarjeet was arrested on May 30, 2007 and “spoke little but smiled a lot” when asked about the murders. While being further questioned he, “Just smiled a lot and asked for biscuits.”

 Superintendent Amit Lodha, a resident of Begusarai (90 miles/145 kilometers east of Bihari, the capital of Patna) said Amarjeet Sada appeared to be a psychiatric case. He was evaluated by professionals and found to be suffering from a conduct disorder. Panta-based psychoanalyst Shamshad Hussain found that this conduct disorder causes Amardeep to behave in a sadistic manner. Due to a severe chemical imbalance in Sada’s brain, he receives a sense of gratification from inflicting injuries on others. A psychologist working on his case explained, “such aggression may be hereditary and may be caused because of great chemical upheavals in the brain.”. According to a former psychology professor at Patna University, Sada did not have a sense of right or wrong when he committed the murders due to his conduct disorder. It is believed with medication, levels of chemicals in his brain can be balanced. Ultimately, the boy was charged with murder and tried as a juvenile. Sada’s story lost steam for most of the world after that point so there is not much information available on what became of him. Although Amarjeet’s current status is “unknown”, we can assume from his graphic and proud confession, he was eventually charged with the murder. Since the boy was tried as a juvenile, in accordance to Indian law, he could not have been imprisoned any longer than three years. Due to his mental state at the time the crimes took place, it is possible he served his sentence in a psychiatric institute in lieu of a juvenile detention center. After his sentence had been served, it is also possible that his parents chose to keep him in a mental health facility; However, considering they did not seek mental health for him after either of the first two murders, it is unlikely he received more therapy than was required. Amarjeet Sada would be approximately 17 years old now (no exact date of birth available, only birth year) and more likely than not, a free young man. There are rumors he may have changed his name to ‘Samarjit’, which is common when young children commit a horrendous crime and are later rehabilitated. Hopefully Amarjeet Sada has been, and will continue to be able to manage his conduct disorder through therapy and medication and live a new life under a new name, scrutiny-free.
UPDATE: After writing this article I was contacted by Amarjeet Sada who claims he is currently living in a children’s home in India where he will remain until he is 18 years of age. No other details at this time.

 

RGV gadiki perfect story 

[Silver_mani]

esa mama choodu

 

ya chusa mayya  ...edo mental disorder anukunta kada 
 

[JANASENA]

ya chusa mayya  ...edo mental disorder anukunta kada 
 

 

 

psycho path 

[JANASENA]

RGV gadiki perfect story 

 

 

+1

[Silver_mani]

psycho path 

 

 

6 years ki asalu vadiki em artham aitadi ani  ...but I wonder how dangerous he is to society after his release from juvenile home

[JANASENA]

6 years ki asalu vadiki em artham aitadi ani  ...but I wonder how dangerous he is to society after his release from juvenile home

 

 

veeedinka parla baa paina esane nithari case aa Lonja kodukulni kalchi padadobbali. vammo nijam ga na  spine chilled.