Proposed I-140 Rule Would Provide Improve Job Flexibility

[KillChillPandey]

u r completely wrong.......... neku theliyakapothe slient ga undu sami.enduku janalaki confuse chestavu... 

 

may be he knows and he dinn get that propertly in words..

 

Currently without this new EO..  There is no 100% Guarantee that your PD will be retained once you change employers.. it it unclear to USCIS too..

Now once 140 is approved after 180 days PD can be retained for Sure.. So this is the clarity they are providing... I'm thinking we should not be filing again and just the case should be taken by other Employer.. Like they should file a petition for overtaking our GC processing. If thats not the case, this new 140 Rule is of no use except clarifying that your PD won't be lost..the other advantage is to extend h1b > 6 years..

 

In the given circumstances, if you re-file for Labor & 140 again (even though you retain PD) it will still take like 1-1.5 years. 

[KillChillPandey]

i-140 transfer chesukolem kotha employer ki ani clear ga septunnadu kada.  i-140 withdraw chesukunte okavela 6th year then h1 renew sesukovachanta new employer gadi daggarikelli but malli GC process perm nundi start seyyalsinde with retained PD.  ante just h1 renewal afre 6 year allow chestunnaru incase i140 withdraw ayithe.

 

 

murthy site eppudu employers side eh matladutundi. mana kosam eppudu fight cheyaledu and help cheyaledu

 

PD kuda retain avtundi 100%... all are missing the same point.. As of today's world anni cases lo PD's retain avvatledu..

 

btw you are right about murthy.. they just pose as helping community but don't do any shiat

[KillChillPandey]

current once your I140 approved , you can carry forward your PD even you change employer and start perm/i140 again. 

 

Vuncle Not in all cases .. PD retaining is a very confusing clause now with USCIS.. vallu ippudu rule ki clarity ki vacharu..

 

You can check court order details on current PD retain.. it is case by case basis.

[KillChillPandey]

Source - http://www.murthy.com/2015/12/30/newsflash-proposed-rule-would-provide-improve-job-flexibility-grace-periods-and-more/   NewsFlash! Proposed Rule Would Provide Improve Job Flexibility, Grace Periods, and More!

December 30, 2015

This morning, a proposed rule was published in the Federal Register that would provide a number of immigration benefits, including grace periods for certain nonimmigrant workers, improved job flexibility, and greater clarity on a number of existing immigration rules. Some of these benefits include:

• Once an I-140 has been approved for 180 days or more, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) would not revoke the I-140 other than in cases of fraud, misrepresentation, or a few other limited situations. While the I-140 still could not be transferred to a new employer, it could nevertheless be used for purposes of extending one's H1B status beyond the 6-year limit, even if the employer withdraws the I-140.

• Certain nonimmigrant workers, including those in E, H1B, L-1, and TN status, would be eligible for a one-time grace period whenever employment ends. The grace period would be for up to 60 or until the existing validity period ends, whichever occurs first. This would allow such workers the opportunity to seek new employment and/or apply for a change of status.

• Automatic renewal of an employment authorization document (EAD) for up to 180 days in certain situations based on a pending I-765 renewal application. Those who have an EAD based on a pending I-485 would potentially be eligible for this benefit. Unfortunately, this rule would not apply to certain EAD recipients, including those in H-4 status.d

• In extremely limited circumstances, the beneficiary of an I-140, and the individual's dependent family members, may be eligible to apply for EADs. However, the eligibility requirements are quite restrictive, including the need to show "compelling circumstances" (e.g., medical emergency, employer retaliation), and recipients of this benefit would typically be required to "…forego adjusting status in the United States and instead seek an immigrant visa abroad through consular processing."

The proposed rule is approximately 180 pages in length, so Murthy Law Firm attorneys are still carefully reviewing and analyzing the content. In the near future, MurthyDotCom will post a more complete, detailed analysis of the proposal. Subscribe to the MurthyBulletin for future updates on this proposed rule and other issues related to immigration law.

 

 

So basically apun ko Ghanta diya  bas..

 

At the max contracting main hey toh FTE le saktey aur pura processing phir se karana.. Job portability would been easier if you need no refile labor & 140 and indeed just file for Change of peition from employer A to Employer B.. adminsitrative wise it might not be easy though..

[vasu123]

murthy site waste man, vadu employers side eh matladutadu, vanni nammadam waste.

[KillChillPandey]

murthy site waste man, vadu employers side eh matladutadu, vanni nammadam waste.

 

antey vaadu site lo raasindi correct ee vuncl.. Check Greg Siskind's blog..

 

basic ga Employers baaga lobbied..

[Raja123]

i-140 transfer chesukolem kotha employer ki ani clear ga septunnadu kada.  i-140 withdraw chesukunte okavela 6th year then h1 renew sesukovachanta new employer gadi daggarikelli but malli GC process perm nundi start seyyalsinde with retained PD.  ante just h1 renewal afre 6 year allow chestunnaru incase i140 withdraw ayithe

+1

[Raja123]

may be he knows and he dinn get that propertly in words..

 

Currently without this new EO..  There is no 100% Guarantee that your PD will be retained once you change employers.. it it unclear to USCIS too..

Now once 140 is approved after 180 days PD can be retained for Sure.. So this is the clarity they are providing... I'm thinking we should not be filing again and just the case should be taken by other Employer.. Like they should file a petition for overtaking our GC processing. If thats not the case, this new 140 Rule is of no use except clarifying that your PD won't be lost..the other advantage is to extend h1b > 6 years..

 

In the given circumstances, if you re-file for Labor & 140 again (even though you retain PD) it will still take like 1-1.5 years. 

endadi??

[KillChillPandey]

 Follow

Greg Siskind‏@gsiskind

OK, initial assessment was right (from this morning) that while I-140 survives, no adjustment without new I-140 approval.Main benefit is in getting AC21 H-1B extensions. Obviously, that's not so useful without a robust EAD benefit.

[KillChillPandey]

endadi??

 

Executive ORder  vaa

[KillChillPandey]

 Follow

Greg Siskind‏@gsiskind

@gsiskind That should make it much, much easier to leave an employer or accept promotions with the same employer & not screw up GC.

[KillChillPandey]

 Follow

Greg Siskind‏@gsiskind

H-1B employees who are whistleblowers against violating employers will be able to maintain status. Good.

[ronitreddy]

So basically apun ko Ghanta diya  bas..

 

At the max contracting main hey toh FTE le saktey aur pura processing phir se karana.. Job portability would been easier if you need no refile labor & 140 and indeed just file for Change of peition from employer A to Employer B.. adminsitrative wise it might not be easy though..

paisalu pothai USCIS ki..anduke refile cheyamanntunaru

[Raja123]

paisalu pothai USCIS ki..anduke refile cheyamanntunaru

[KillChillPandey]

paisalu pothai USCIS ki..anduke refile cheyamanntunaru

 

mavni lo join avvu :)