Rao_Garu Posted December 30, 2015 Report Posted December 30, 2015 Serious Illnesses and Disabilities. The nonimmigrant worker can demonstrate that he or she, or his or her dependent, is facing a serious illness or disability that entails the worker moving to a different geographic area for treatment or otherwise substantially changing his or her employment circumstances. Employer Retaliation. The nonimmigrant worker can demonstrate that he or she is involved in a dispute regarding the employer’s illegal or dishonest activity as evidenced by, for example, a complaint filed with a relevant government agency or court, and the employer has taken retaliatory action that justifies granting separate employment authorization to the worker on a discretionary basis. Other Substantial Harm to the Applicant. The nonimmigrant worker can demonstrate that due to compelling circumstances, he or she will be unable to timely extend or otherwise maintain status, or obtain another nonimmigrant status, and absent continued employment authorization under this proposal the applicant and his or her family would suffer substantial harm. Such circumstances, for example, may involve an H-1B nonimmigrant worker who has been applying an industry-specific skillset in a high-technology sector for years with a U.S. entity that is unexpectedly terminating its business, where the worker is able to establish: (1) that the same or a similar industry (e.g., nuclear energy, aeronautics, or artificial intelligence) does not materially exist in the home country, and (2) that the resulting inability to find productive employment would 100 cause significant hardship to the worker and his or her family if required to return home. In such circumstances, the employment authorization proposal would provide the individual with an opportunity to find another employer to sponsor him or her for immigrant or nonimmigrant status and thereby protect the worker and his or her family members from the substantial harm they would suffer if required to depart the United States. Significant Disruption to the Employer. The nonimmigrant worker can show that due to compelling circumstances, he or she is unexpectedly unable to timely extend or change status, there are no other possible avenues for the immediate employment of such worker with that employer, and the worker’s departure would cause the petitioning employer substantial disruption to a project for which the worker is a critical employee. Such circumstances, for example, may include the following: o An L-1B nonimmigrant worker is sponsored for permanent residence by an employer that subsequently undergoes corporate restructuring (e.g., a sale, split, or spin off) such that the worker’s new employer is no longer a multinational company eligible to employ L-1B workers, there are no available avenues to promptly obtain another work-authorized nonimmigrant status for the worker, and the employer would suffer substantial disruption due to the critical nature of the worker’s services. In such cases, the employment authorization proposal would provide the employer and worker a temporary bridge allowing for continued 101 employment while they continue in their efforts to obtain a new nonimmigrant or immigrant status. o An H-1B nonimmigrant worker is providing critical work on biomedical research for an entity affiliated with an institution of higher education, thus making the entity exempt from the H-1B cap, when the funding for the research unexpectedly changes and now comes through a for-profit entity, thus causing the entity to lose its cap-exempt status. In cases where the worker is unable to quickly obtain H-1B status based on a cap-subject H-1B petition or another work-authorized nonimmigrant status, the employment authorization proposal would provide a temporary bridge for continued employment of the worker when his or her departure would create substantial disruption to the employer’s biomedical research.
Rao_Garu Posted December 30, 2015 Author Report Posted December 30, 2015 2 mukkallo Cheppu bhayya 1 mukka =RA 2 mukka =DU
Yuva Nataratna Posted December 30, 2015 Report Posted December 30, 2015 lol.... ee reasons lekapothe one yr wait cheyyala EAD kosam....intha daaniki rule endukura jaffa ucciicss....
tennisluvr Posted December 30, 2015 Report Posted December 30, 2015 evarainana summary chepandi samy Yaandi vayya cheppedi, compelling reasons choosavu kadaa 3 - 4 points. More than 95% won't qualify to come under those reasons, so for the vast majority of people who are awaiting EAD with an approved I 140 this rule won't apply. So don't be too over excited about this implementation, it addresses less than 5% of the problems faced by H1B holders. Now that they have implemented a watered down useless amendment, there will be no more change in our wait times or any other H1b related regulations. You will wait atleast 5-6 years before you can even consider yourself eligible to apply for EAD due to this situation.
Lukewalker Posted December 30, 2015 Report Posted December 30, 2015 Yaandi vayya cheppedi, compelling reasons choosavu kadaa 3 - 4 points. More than 95% won't qualify to come under those reasons, so for the vast majority of people who are awaiting EAD with an approved I 140 this rule won't apply. So don't be too over excited about this implementation, it addresses less than 5% of the problems faced by H1B holders. Now that they have implemented a watered down useless amendment, there will be no more change in our wait times or any other H1b related regulations. You will wait atleast 5-6 years before you can even consider yourself eligible to apply for EAD due to this situation. +140 thu jeevitham, last ki bokka pedtaru ani telsina edho aasa, published rule edhayina hope untundemo ani
Barney_Stinson Posted December 30, 2015 Report Posted December 30, 2015 in other words compelling reasons antey jeevitam motham sanka naaki verey dari lekapovadam .. adi 3 % kanna takkuva mandikey undachu ..situation unna danni document chesi u sis ni convince cheadam pedda task .. over all notlo peddadi pettadu
Feelingbad Posted December 30, 2015 Report Posted December 30, 2015 Proof lu evadu ivvagalthaadu ? evai bokalu vaallaki unnayi.... USCIS vaadu theliviga mallee mana meedhaney vesesaadu gaa.... Thellallu maamoolu thelivi kaadu assal... :3D_Smiles_38:
HAPPINESS_ Posted December 30, 2015 Report Posted December 30, 2015 in other words compelling reasons antey jeevitam motham sanka naaki verey dari lekapovadam .. adi 3 % kanna takkuva mandikey undachu ..situation unna danni document chesi u sis ni convince cheadam pedda task .. over all notlo peddadi pettadu inka doubt aa...
Recommended Posts