I-140 Regulations Websites Comments --- Its Sad

[Dr_sheldoncooper2]

http://www.regulations.gov/index.jsp#!docketBrowser;rpp=25;po=0;dct=PS;D=USCIS-2015-0008

 

 

USCIS venakaninchi pettinattu vundi andariki .. anni negative comments ee ...

[Dr_sheldoncooper2]

Donald trump vaste andariki green cards ichestadu .. spread the word ...

[Silver_mani]

http://www.regulations.gov/index.jsp#!docketBrowser;rpp=25;po=0;dct=PS;D=USCIS-2015-0008

 

 

USCIS venakaninchi pettinattu vundi andariki .. anni negative comments ee ...

post them here

[Dr_sheldoncooper2]

This is an outrageous rule because it has been watered down and deviated from the original directive of the President's Executive Order. There is absolutely nothing meaningful on offer in this rule for the Legal High-Skill Working community who have an approved immigrant petition!

President Obama's Immigration Executive Order and the Fact Sheet released by the White House (https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/11/20/fact-sheet-immigration-accountability-executive-action) explicitly promised two things (among many others) for the legal community:

1. Providing portable work authorization for high-skilled workers awaiting LPR status and their spouses
2. Ensuring that individuals with lawful status can travel to their countries of origin.

There is absolutely nothing in this rule for folks who have been waiting in decade long lines for their green cards. In fact, it just creates additional burdens for the same individuals (and their families) making them tether to their employers for years and years.

Here are the changes that this rule needs to stay true to the President's original intent:

1. Provide immediate Employment Authorization (EAD) for anyone who is waiting in line for a Green Card because of backlogs. These backlogs are unjustly hurting people from a few countries only (China, India, Phillipines, Mexico) and individuals from these countries are stuck in the same jobs without an ability to change employers, start their own businesses, take promotions etc.

2. Completely eliminate the "Compelling Circumstances" clauses. There should be no need to prove that there are any compelling circumstances as these individuals are already stuck in backlogs created by administrative inefficiencies (visa number wastage) and creating backlogs endlessly tying people into one job wasn't the original intent of congress anyway. People who have an approved immigrant petition (I-140) should be immediately allowed to file for Employment Authorization (EAD) without too many hurdles. These individuals have been stuck with the same employer for years with no end in sight to their wait through the backlogs for greencards.

I do support some of the regulations \ clarifications in here (I-140 ownership by the immigrant, 60 day grace period in case of job loss, I-140 portability even in case of withdrawal) but I would like to state these there are current practices that are just being formally codified. So in that sense, these are nothing new - These were long overdue codifications of the processes that USCIS already practiced and hopefully they will eliminate any inconsistencies in the future.

USCIS/ DHS should realize that it is incredibly short-sighted to infer that an ability to take a new job due to a (visa transfer) + (refile of PERM) + (refile of I-140) + (same or similar clarification) is not the same as having an Employment Authorization. In fact equating the two just indicates that people who drafted this rule are either incredibly naive or really sinister in their intentions. Asking prospective employers for visa transfers and restarting the immigration process instantly puts a lot of job opportunities out of the reach of candidates while having an EAD creates minimal burden on both the new employer and the employee and thereby makes the candidate more desirable. Forcing legal immigrants to go through the process again just creates an endless stream of revenue for the legal firms and most importantly suppresses wages and hurts the american worker because immigrants continue to be exploited like slaves with no freedom.

I would also ask for disclosure of the names and affiliations of the USCIS/DHS officials who were involved in drafting this proposal because this reeks of corporate corruption at the highest scale where lobbyist-turned-administrators muddy up administrative fixes to keep their prior\future masters happy. I would request the FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) to investigate this case as this is a perfect example where few corrupt and morally void people in power at USCIS/DHS are maligning the name of the entire organization whose purpose it should be to serve the homeland, be just to immigrants and the american citizenry.

Why do undocumented individuals get Employment Authorization cards (a case that the Government and Agency hopes to defend successfully in the Supreme Court) while legal immigrants have to continue to file and re-file their papers while getting stuck in a non-immigrant visa without any Employment Authorization. It is absolutely corrupt and outrageous to ask legal immigrants for "Compelling Circumstances" while the bar is set different for undocumented individuals. By the same yardstick, legal Immigrants should simply be granted their EAD if there is backlog for greencards without any need for compelling circumstances.

I am hoping that the administration looks at the comments and makes appropriate fixes to this rule asap. It is still not late to do the right thing!

[Dr_sheldoncooper2]

This proposed rule discriminates against U.S. Workers in favor of foreign nationals. There are more than enough skilled American workers for these jobs. Once again, the President chooses foreign workers over American workers. H1 b visa jobs were meant to be temporary. Corporations use them to have an endless supply of cheap labor. The law was meant for H1 b visa holders to go home. Also, Congress has not authorized a work around to green card caps imposed by law. I also believe this rule breaks the law. I am against this rule. h1 b visa holders should go home when the visa expires. American workers and wages are hurt by this rule. I say no to this rule. Also, only the comments of American citizens should be taken into account. Foreign nationals have posted they will flood this site with positive comments on the rule. That is outrageous. 2016 is an election year. I will note vote for any democrat who favors this rule which puts foreign workers above American workers. it's also disingenuous to post this rule on New Year's Eve when you thought Americans weren't paying attention. We are. Can't wait for Election Day!Thank you, Judy Harnett.

 

[Direct_Shooter]

Ltt

[LungiLingaraju]

 

This proposed rule discriminates against U.S. Workers in favor of foreign nationals. There are more than enough skilled American workers for these jobs. Once again, the President chooses foreign workers over American workers. H1 b visa jobs were meant to be temporary. Corporations use them to have an endless supply of cheap labor. The law was meant for H1 b visa holders to go home. Also, Congress has not authorized a work around to green card caps imposed by law. I also believe this rule breaks the law. I am against this rule. h1 b visa holders should go home when the visa expires. American workers and wages are hurt by this rule. I say no to this rule. Also, only the comments of American citizens should be taken into account. Foreign nationals have posted they will flood this site with positive comments on the rule. That is outrageous. 2016 is an election year. I will note vote for any democrat who favors this rule which puts foreign workers above American workers. it's also disingenuous to post this rule on New Year's Eve when you thought Americans weren't paying attention. We are. Can't wait for Election Day!Thank you, Judy Harnett.

 

asal ee rule ki papa comments ki sambandam ee ledu .. frustration undi H1 vallu ante adi ardam aindi .. 

[Silver_mani]

 

This proposed rule discriminates against U.S. Workers in favor of foreign nationals. There are more than enough skilled American workers for these jobs. Once again, the President chooses foreign workers over American workers. H1 b visa jobs were meant to be temporary. Corporations use them to have an endless supply of cheap labor. The law was meant for H1 b visa holders to go home. Also, Congress has not authorized a work around to green card caps imposed by law. I also believe this rule breaks the law. I am against this rule. h1 b visa holders should go home when the visa expires. American workers and wages are hurt by this rule. I say no to this rule. Also, only the comments of American citizens should be taken into account. Foreign nationals have posted they will flood this site with positive comments on the rule. That is outrageous. 2016 is an election year. I will note vote for any democrat who favors this rule which puts foreign workers above American workers. it's also disingenuous to post this rule on New Year's Eve when you thought Americans weren't paying attention. We are. Can't wait for Election Day!Thank you, Judy Harnett.

 

 

 

[Dr_sheldoncooper2]

asal ee rule ki papa comments ki sambandam ee ledu .. frustration undi H1 vallu ante adi ardam aindi .. 

ade kada .. rule ento teleedu but vachestaru negative comments ki

[vasu123]

Manam entha arichina vadu assalu flexibility EAD lu ivvadu, h1 meedane slaves la undi maku lawyer laku business ivvandi ane attitude tho unnaru.


andaru kalisi india vellipothe thappa vallaku mana tho entha important pani undo teliyadu. Mana lo elagu unity undadu and manam deniki dare chesi theginchalem, piriki pandhelam. so just slaves la undandi inka, vallu ishtamochinattu taxes theesukuntaru citizens gc vallatho equal ga but visa job options ki ochesariki only for gc n citizens antaru.

[vasu123]

This proposed rule discriminates against U.S. Workers in favor of foreign nationals. There are more than enough skilled American workers for these jobs. Once again, the President chooses foreign workers over American workers. H1 b visa jobs were meant to be temporary. Corporations use them to have an endless supply of cheap labor. The law was meant for H1 b visa holders to go home. Also, Congress has not authorized a work around to green card caps imposed by law. I also believe this rule breaks the law. I am against this rule. h1 b visa holders should go home when the visa expires. American workers and wages are hurt by this rule. I say no to this rule. Also, only the comments of American citizens should be taken into account. Foreign nationals have posted they will flood this site with positive comments on the rule. That is outrageous. 2016 is an election year. I will note vote for any democrat who favors this rule which puts foreign workers above American workers. it's also disingenuous to post this rule on New Year's Eve when you thought Americans weren't paying attention. We are. Can't wait for Election Day!Thank you, Judy Harnett.

Job mobility and flexibility isthe american workers ke help avutundi, h1 people won't work for cheap salaries so american workers won't be displaced. due to not having rights and job flexibilities to h1b candidates they are exploited by employers and come for cheap salary and companies displace american workers.

picha na thellollu problem evaritho no enduko chudakunda ma jobs potunnay antarenti.

[LungiLingaraju]

chala mandi negative comments from US citizens. Expanding H1 program ante jaffa gallu H1 quota increase anukuntunaru ... babarious commets okkakadu ... okkade vere vere names tho chestunadani naa feeling ... anni okate roju vachinay 1/10 .. but negative comments so sad :(

[BeeruboyAmbani]

http://www.regulations.gov/index.jsp#!docketBrowser;rpp=25;po=0;dct=PS;D=USCIS-2015-0008

 

 

USCIS venakaninchi pettinattu vundi andariki .. anni negative comments ee ...

Dont follow all this shiat myan... ayedi aithadi.. destiny decides... urkee avakamundu feel ayyi, ayaka feel ayyi.. y re?

[tennisluvr]

Manam entha arichina vadu assalu flexibility EAD lu ivvadu, h1 meedane slaves la undi maku lawyer laku business ivvandi ane attitude tho unnaru.


andaru kalisi india vellipothe thappa vallaku mana tho entha important pani undo teliyadu. Mana lo elagu unity undadu and manam deniki dare chesi theginchalem, piriki pandhelam. so just slaves la undandi inka, vallu ishtamochinattu taxes theesukuntaru citizens gc vallatho equal ga but visa job options ki ochesariki only for gc n citizens antaru.

You are right. US has no moral high ground to talk about rules and laws when they are showing such blatant double standards, even in the case of immigrants who have come here without breaking the law

[LungiLingaraju]

jeevitham veella negative comments soosthe emaitadoo ani anpistundi ..