JANASENA Posted January 19, 2016 Report Posted January 19, 2016 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPkr3A9DTOc Russian aviation engineer Tatarenko Vladimir Nikolaevich has unveiled a new design for an airplane that might just make surviving an air crash a possibility. Nikolaevich’s design consist of a detachable cabin that could be ejected at any time during take off, mid-flight or landing and allow the passengers to land safely. Parachutes will be attached to the roof of the cabin that would be released when the cabin is detached from the plane. To make the impact of the landing softer, there would be rubber tubes that would inflate and cushion the impact. The inflatable tubes can also keep the cabin afloat in case of a water landing. The prototype also includes storage space designed to hold luggage under the cabin, so that passengers wouldn’t lose any of their personal belongings. “While aircraft engineers all over the world are trying to make planes safer, they can do nothing about the human factor,” said Nikolaevich. Nikolaevich claims that 95% percent of those he surveyed are in favor of paying more for airplane tickets if the detachable cabin were to become a standard feature. Not everyone is completely on-board with the idea though. Some people are questioning the cost-effectiveness while others are wondering whether the cabin will safely land or smash into mountains or buildings. Some are even asking what will happen to the pilots. The new design could also dramatically weaken the airframe “because now you have joints and fittings to connect a fuselage and a body together where once you had a whole fuselage to reinforce the airframe."
JasonBourne13 Posted January 19, 2016 Report Posted January 19, 2016 EE buddi ippativaraku enduku ledo... nice concept. Papam Pilots ni lite teeskunnaru
Enjoy99 Posted January 19, 2016 Report Posted January 19, 2016 EE buddi ippativaraku enduku ledo... nice concept. Papam Pilots ni lite teeskunnaru Adhe ga last minute varaku balance chese cockpit crew ni picha lite thisukunnaru Unless they run in last min to passenger area
galiraju Posted January 19, 2016 Report Posted January 19, 2016 How about in cabin smoke?They shud also put in an exhaust. More deaths happen to inhaling those posionos gases.
JasonBourne13 Posted January 19, 2016 Report Posted January 19, 2016 Adhe ga last minute varaku balance chese cockpit crew ni picha lite thisukunnaru Unless they run in last min to passenger area Actually this design is even better. No passenger could interact with cockpit crew. Hijacks are out of question. But pilots' lives are at stake. I also don't think this would be in use in at least 10 years. Airlines are so frugal to replace their existing flights.
150bryant Posted January 19, 2016 Report Posted January 19, 2016 pilots ki quick fix inkoti emaina cheyachu le.. like parachutes etc. as far as this post... buckling a whole cabin out of a plane for safety is not feasible in design. again...whn flying has become a possibility..other actions can also be put forth i guess
JasonBourne13 Posted January 19, 2016 Report Posted January 19, 2016 pilots ki quick fix inkoti emaina cheyachu le.. like parachutes etc. as far as this post... buckling a whole cabin out of a plane for safety is not feasible in design. again...whn flying has become a possibility..other actions can also be put forth i guess Parachutes are not an option for commercial flights. They cruise at high altitudes where pressure is too low to remain conscious and survive. Any altitude greater than 10000 ft you need supplemental oxygen if you are sky diving or falling out of plane. Any altitude greater than 19 km, you need a space suit. Greater than 12 km, you need supplemental oxygen inside the flight.
galiraju Posted January 19, 2016 Report Posted January 19, 2016 Actually this design is even better. No passenger could interact with cockpit crew. Hijacks are out of question. But pilots' lives are at stake. I also don't think this would be in use in at least 10 years. Airlines are so frugal to replace their existing flights. 10 Yrs are u kidding me. 10 Yrs lo project la chestharu emohave seen 20 Years or 30 MD80 still in American airlines fleet
150bryant Posted January 19, 2016 Report Posted January 19, 2016 Parachutes are not an option for commercial flights. They cruise at high altitudes where pressure is too low to remain conscious and survive. Any altitude greater than 10000 ft you need supplemental oxygen if you are sky diving or falling out of plane. Any altitude greater than 19 km, you need a space suit. Greater than 12 km, you need supplemental oxygen inside the flight. solution aitey undhi kadha bro...
galiraju Posted January 19, 2016 Report Posted January 19, 2016 Parachutes are not an option for commercial flights. They cruise at high altitudes where pressure is too low to remain conscious and survive. Any altitude greater than 10000 ft you need supplemental oxygen if you are sky diving or falling out of plane. Any altitude greater than 19 km, you need a space suit. Greater than 12 km, you need supplemental oxygen inside the flight. If it is not a cockpit fire they should get exit mechanism like military jets.
MRI Posted January 19, 2016 Report Posted January 19, 2016 Parachutes are not an option for commercial flights. They cruise at high altitudes where pressure is too low to remain conscious and survive. Any altitude greater than 10000 ft you need supplemental oxygen if you are sky diving or falling out of plane. Any altitude greater than 19 km, you need a space suit. Greater than 12 km, you need supplemental oxygen inside the flight. bro nenu 12000ft nunchi skydive chesina.... luggage compartment kuda separate ayipoyi.... passengers safety gurinchi chuste better kada vikuba?!
MRI Posted January 19, 2016 Report Posted January 19, 2016 idi entha varaku nijam?? concept naaku nachale... theda kodutundi.........
.thumb.jpg.ce42bb16ec102475a78c2087ce269c7d.jpg)
.thumb.gif.343fe49c7e1c507ae0056326bd8cf77e.gif)
Recommended Posts