MindRinger Posted January 24, 2016 Author Report Posted January 24, 2016 as per your context A is always constant being me or you or whoever the subject is and B is variable could be a thing a living being or abstract things such as what you have done (ur actions) - when I am trying to think about myself - I am reflecting myself through my own actions. In naive terms you are defined by your actions and for the q are you truly thinking about yourself - yes I am thinking about my own actions. When you say "your actions", you are separating YOU ACTIONS as two different things. I am asking you to think about yourself, not your actions.
MindRinger Posted January 24, 2016 Author Report Posted January 24, 2016 A- the thinker, B-Flower/football/studies are separate entities. When A & B is within a close proximity, then it is A's selection of choices to watch B which is within A's close vicinity & either think about it (or) alternatively A could constantly glare B's existence & think about a contrasting entity which can be C.In another scenario B could possibly be given the thinking ability on par with A' skillset & start thinking about A. Here A&B are identical entities who are able to think about each other. Both A&B can think about entity C (the original entity "B" at the same time, provided they are within visible reach. Both A&B can think about contrasting C (i.e A's C can be a football/flower, whereas B's C is something different eg: reading,at the same time, though both of them are watching a common C which is in reach to both. While A&B are immersed in thinking about the entity C (originally provided "B") their cognitive abilities provide ample clues to decipher the relative thought process about C. To understand the self & their thinking process, both A&B will need to focus on the triggering shafts which have set a cause for them to channelize their time & efforts on one entity. Before pressing the POST button, have you ever considered revising this chaos of English alphabets that you ejaculated here?
MindRinger Posted January 24, 2016 Author Report Posted January 24, 2016 Thinker is always a person = A Thinking will be done on some action/event/thing done by A = B We are not taking about A's or B's events or actions. We are talking about A and B itself.
MindRinger Posted January 25, 2016 Author Report Posted January 25, 2016 Calling sooperu Next time, do not invite mediocrity.
cool_dood Posted January 25, 2016 Report Posted January 25, 2016 When you say "your actions", you are separating YOU ACTIONS as two different things. I am asking you to think about yourself, not your actions. man lemme tell ya sumthin u r opinionated dood no offense though - u sound lyk u cant accept ne one beyond u urself :(
MindRinger Posted January 25, 2016 Author Report Posted January 25, 2016 man lemme tell ya sumthin u r opinionated dood no offense though - u sound lyk u cant accept ne one beyond u urself :( Acknowledged. But will not agree/disagree/respond.
Recommended Posts