Maga_Jathi_Vajram Posted January 28, 2016 Report Posted January 28, 2016 Bhayya Na sincere manavai, Nuvu English baga matladthav. Why don't u make an attempt to write a comment jus like this one on behalf of AFDB. I am sure it would be a cake walk for u . You can start new thread and we all Db members can pour our ideas . Please do give it a thought Dear Kevin / USCIS,I am writing to convey that I completely REJECT this rule in its current form.I am a proud legal resident of the great country of USA. I have a family too. Because of the inflexible nature of H1 employment, I often spend time away from my family. As a person with an approved I140, I need atleast the flexibility to change jobs without jeopardising my GC process. Sadly this rule does not accomplish this.This proposed rule does not in any way "stabilize" the lives of many legal high skilled immigrants like me. This proposed rule feels like a tight slap on the face of all law abiding, legal, high skilled immigrants. Furthermore, this rule does not give any added freedom or flexibility to an employee. The employee still has to start on his GC journey again once he switches employers. And also I am sure folks at USCIS know that not every company out there is willing to hire a person on an H1 visa. Do you know this? So it is utterly laughable when you claim that this proposed rule is supposed to "give more options and flexibility to employees who wish to change jobs". What a bunch of baloney. Do you know that there are job advertisements and postings out there that specifically say "Unable to sponsor visa at this time"? The only new thing that this rule is providing is that an employee can extend his/her H1 visa beyond the 6 year limit even if the previous employer withdraws the I140 provided it has been 180 days since the I140 has been approved. This is like putting a band aid to fix a shark bite. The system is broke, you know it , I know it and The President knows it. That is why he directed you to fix it. And is this your fix? Ridiculous. The longer you keep backlogged folks on H1 status, the worse it is going to be for the American worker. Because an H1b is an attractive proposition to any exploitative employer. Because an H1b will compromise to maintain his status.The employer who wants to cut his costs will simply keep hiring more and more H1bs and keep displacing the American worker. No wonder the layoffs at Disney happened. At this rate, that's just the tip of the iceberg.I see that you have come up with a list of possible compelling reasons which would make it straight to a Martin Scorsese script. May I ask you how these ridiculous compelling reasons come under the framework of employment based immigration? Do we look like begging refugees to you? Why should we have to provide these compelling reasons? And after we send you our sob story, you are going to decide if that is compelling enough? And lo and behold, if you think our story compels you, what do we get? We get an EAD card valid for 1 year? Without AP? That EAD belongs only in 1 place and that is the trash can ( that's assuming our sob story makes the cut )To be of any use, please provide the following as part of this rule.1. Provide EAD/AP to all folks with approved I140s. 2. No need to restart PERM / GC process upon switching employers. I always wondered how you can keep folks who have had their "immigrant petitions" approved but stuck in backlog...How can you ask them to be on a H1 visa until their date becomes current? So what is the meaning of an "IMMIGRANT" petition. I think its high time you changed the name of I140 to "slave petition" and the name of H1 visa to "slave visa" ( of course only for backlogged folks). Because everyone else is living the American dream. Us backlogged folks are enduring our American nightmare.Please fix this rule so that it may actually benefit future American families who have adhered to every law of the land and waited patiently for years.Thank youhttp://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=USCIS-2015-0008-4040
dishum_dishum Posted January 28, 2016 Report Posted January 28, 2016 Bhayya Na sincere manavai, Nuvu English baga matladthav. Why don't u make an attempt to write a comment jus like this one on behalf of AFDB. I am sure it would be a cake walk for u . You can start new thread and we all Db members can pour our ideas . Please do give it a thought LTT
MRI Posted January 28, 2016 Report Posted January 28, 2016 bro nannu vesukuntunaruga.... english lo nenepudu matladanu bro....?? naakem fake ids levu.... no controvery bro.....
mustang302 Posted January 28, 2016 Report Posted January 28, 2016 english antae narsi aka rebel ae perfect..thellolaki kooda mathi tiruguthadi...!!
ronitreddy Posted January 28, 2016 Report Posted January 28, 2016 english antae narsi aka rebel ae perfect..thellolaki kooda mathi tiruguthadi...!! neku thirgindi ani seppochu gaa
MRI Posted January 28, 2016 Report Posted January 28, 2016 bro... nuvu nanu eppudu chusavo telidu... naadem goppa english kaadu.... ikkada naakante baga matladevallu vunaru... and na PD 2010 dec bro.....
suryausa Posted January 28, 2016 Report Posted January 28, 2016 english antae narsi aka rebel ae perfect..thellolaki kooda mathi tiruguthadi...!! who is mindringer then?
Lukewalker Posted January 28, 2016 Report Posted January 28, 2016 who is mindringer then? mindringer oka adbuhtam enduko rebel, mind ringer okati ani eppatnuncho kottesthundhi adhe kelukkotam, adhe english etc
Maga_Jathi_Vajram Posted January 28, 2016 Author Report Posted January 28, 2016 Got confused I actually meant mind ringer bro nannu vesukuntunaruga.... english lo nenepudu matladanu bro....?? naakem fake ids levu.... no controvery bro.....
.thumb.jpg.ce42bb16ec102475a78c2087ce269c7d.jpg)
Recommended Posts