Jump to content

Michael Moore Says Trump ‘Won’ The Debate


Recommended Posts

Posted

Pro-Hillary gloaters doing end-zone dance again when still on 50-yd line. U MUST get it in your head TRUMP IS GONNA WIN and act accordingly!

— Michael Moore (@MMFlint) September 27, 2016

Posted

If u just turn off the TV right now and do nothing, you’ve just elected Donald Trump. Do something! Plan what you’re going to do tomorrow.

— Michael Moore (@MMFlint) September 27, 2016

Posted

It’s over. Trump, the egoist, the racist, the narcissist, the liar, “won.” We all lost. His numbers will go up. She told the truth. So what.

— Michael Moore (@MMFlint) September 27, 2016

Posted

Five minutes left. I wish she would just go off on him. BOOM! Too much preparation, too much class. Oh well.

— Michael Moore (@MMFlint) September 27, 2016

Posted

She was good on the birther business — but didn’t u want to see her go full throttle on him? I mean, just look at him and say “Shame on u.”

— Michael Moore (@MMFlint) September 27, 2016

Posted

agreed. Only way to win against Trump is to treat him like a rabid dog.

she was unnecessarily nice.

Posted
46 minutes ago, lazybugger said:

agreed. Only way to win against Trump is to treat him like a rabid dog.

she was unnecessarily nice.

@3$% 2 more pupper shows  to go.

Posted
1 minute ago, Idassamed said:

@3$% 2 more pupper shows  to go.

debates waste man. clearly Trump has the edge. 

Clinton bumbled on NAFTA and TPP. game over.

 

Posted

next debate ki touchdown aitadi 50 yard line nunchi 60 yard rush td by hillary

Posted
2 minutes ago, lazybugger said:

debates waste man. clearly Trump has the edge. 

Clinton bumbled on NAFTA and TPP. game over.

 

That's what it looked like, she was too nice to him. He was more like repeating himself but seemed to talk at least some sense ( not on all the topics though). When asked about bringing back jobs, she was talking about trade.

Posted
1 minute ago, Idassamed said:

That's what it looked like, she was too nice to him. He was more like repeating himself but seemed to talk at least some sense ( not on all the topics though). When asked about bringing back jobs, she was talking about trade.

It looks like he was talking common sense, but it is not why these trade deals are being signed. Its almost impossible to explain why trade deals are necessary on a debate in a way that everyone gets it, that's why Clinton shut her trap.

The way we look at an 'economy' is itself wrong. Focusing on jobs, only serves to politicise the economy, not think about it rationally.

Clinton has to find a way to explain her stand on NAFTA or TPP. Otherwise she's going to look foolish like she did yesterday.

But the funny thing is, Trump will sign the TPP when he becomes president. There's simply no other way. Americans who lose their jobs - tough luck, but no other way.

Canada has a slightly better way of dealing with this, which means we pay much more for our goods, and higher taxes, and bigger social safety nets.

US wants lower taxes, and also abrogation of NAFTA, TPP. avva kaavaala buvva kaavaala type. fcuk these hypocrites. let them rot. 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...