Who is god ?

[micxas]

12 hours ago, timmy said:

 

How can we come to conclusion that  valmiki ramayana is the source to decide. Valmiki was a devotee of Rama. So chances are high that he might leaned towards rama while writing ramayana. So Valmiki ramayana should not be taken as the only source of what happened in Rama & Ravana war. If there are no other source's that doesn't mean what valmiki wrote is exactly happened.

Timmy  asalu ramayana vundhani telisindhe Valmiki rayatam chetha adhi source  kakapothe inkedi source avuthundi there is no evidence to show that there were any other  versions of ramayana exist before Valmiki. Valmiki is a part of the story so obv. he is part of the story  his  book is more reliable. Rama devotee ayithe enti that will not conclude he is partial towards Rama, He was a devotee of Rama because Rama had 16  great and unique qualities that no one ever had.

And keep all this apart parayi vaadi bhaaryanu apaharinchina vadu enta balavanthudaina chastadu, adhi one of the main morale of this book. Adhi vadilesi... what will you get out of glorying Rama or Ravana anyway it's more about their actions and how they lived and set an example to coming generations. Do you see my point?

 

[micxas]

12 hours ago, Khadgam said:

Dude, TV9 ekkuva chusthava?

Exactly 

[timmy]

9 hours ago, micxas said:

Timmy  asalu ramayana vundhani telisindhe Valmiki rayatam chetha adhi source  kakapothe inkedi source avuthundi there is no evidence to show that there were any other  versions of ramayana exist before Valmiki. Valmiki is a part of the story so obv. he is part of the story  his  book is more reliable. Rama devotee ayithe enti that will not conclude he is partial towards Rama, He was a devotee of Rama because Rama had 16  great and unique qualities that no one ever had.

And keep all this apart parayi vaadi bhaaryanu apaharinchina vadu enta balavanthudaina chastadu, adhi one of the main morale of this book. Adhi vadilesi... what will you get out of glorying Rama or Ravana anyway it's more about their actions and how they lived and set an example to coming generations. Do you see my point?

 

That doesnt mean everything is true. Oka writer book ni source chesukoni we cant blindly take it as what happened  between rama & ravana ani antunna.  

How can you conclude that he is not partial towards rama?? 

Sita ni ravanaasurudu apaharinchaadu ani valmiki rasadu kabatti you are making an argument that he is bad but valmiki inkola raasi unte adhey follow ayyevaadivaa?  

History lo edhi jarigina aa writer mindset, athanu influence aina daani batti book rasthaadu, but that doesnt give exact resemblence of what happened in the history.

Eventually death comes to everyone bad guy or good guy, it all depends on time.  I am not gloryfying the either rama or ravana? infact  valmiki has written the book glorifying rama kadha ?  how can we take the book literally antunna?

If there is no other source for the story that was written in a book does it make true??

 

[micxas]

15 minutes ago, timmy said:

That doesnt mean everything is true. Oka writer book ni source chesukoni we cant blindly take it as what happened  between rama & ravana ani antunna.  

How can you conclude that he is not partial towards rama?? 

Sita ni ravanaasurudu apaharinchaadu ani valmiki rasadu kabatti you are making an argument that he is bad but valmiki inkola raasi unte adhey follow ayyevaadivaa?  

History lo edhi jarigina aa writer mindset, athanu influence aina daani batti book rasthaadu, but that doesnt give exact resemblence of what happened in the history.

Eventually death comes to everyone bad guy or good guy, it all depends on time.  I am not gloryfying the either rama or ravana? infact  valmiki has written the book glorifying rama kadha ?  how can we take the book literally antunna?

If there is no other source for the story that was written in a book does it make true??

 

I don't see this going anywhere TIMMY 

Ramayana was not written to glorify Rama afaik

 

[BUDDY]

22 hours ago, timmy said:

 

How can we come to conclusion that  valmiki ramayana is the source to decide. Valmiki was a devotee of Rama. So chances are high that he might leaned towards rama while writing ramayana. So Valmiki ramayana should not be taken as the only source of what happened in Rama & Ravana war. If there are no other source's that doesn't mean what valmiki wrote is exactly happened.

that's why they say ' History is written by the Victors'  

[timmy]

Just now, BUDDY said:

that's why they say ' History is written by the Victors'  

   

you just woke up  or didnt go to sleep yet??

[BUDDY]

2 minutes ago, timmy said:

   

you just woke up  or didnt go to sleep yet??

wokeup couple of hours ago  

[SonaParv_522]

10 minutes ago, BUDDY said:

wokeup couple of hours ago  

You cant survive with out sleep

Better do it ontime

[tables]

Devudu meeda neeku inni doubts unnai... Akkada kondaru edava mundakodukulu Kula devudu ani kuda classsify cheskunnaru, I don't know what does kula devudu mean 

[BUDDY]

14 minutes ago, SonaParv_522 said:

You cant survive with out sleep

Better do it ontime

I do get enough sleep man but my sleep timings are a little messed up. 

[lazybugger]

8 minutes ago, tables said:

Devudu meeda neeku inni doubts unnai... Akkada kondaru edava mundakodukulu Kula devudu ani kuda classsify cheskunnaru, I don't know what does kula devudu mean 

neekenti noppi? do they use their kula devudu to project political power? or bother you?