kiladi bullodu Posted March 12, 2017 Author Report Posted March 12, 2017 @samaja_varagamana @samajaaragamana Quote
4Vikram Posted March 12, 2017 Report Posted March 12, 2017 11 minutes ago, kiladi bullodu said: @samaja_varagamana @samajaaragamana entidi maaketidi antuna Quote
MindRinger Posted March 12, 2017 Report Posted March 12, 2017 35 minutes ago, kiladi bullodu said: There are a few problems with the drainage that I have quoted here. Rape and virginity are two entirely different subjects of discussion. 1) The female never actually confesses to the person of interest that she was raped. Instead, she tells the guy in a challenging tone that she is not a virgin, as if that was something to be proud of. It is nothing to be ashamed of either. If you have an issue, convey it in a serious tone. 2) 33.7 kilometers is the minimum distance that needs to be maintained from females of this type. 3) The director is an idiot. Apart from the ridiculously stupid scenes, he wrongfully assumed that the contrast of the words "Sita" and "I'm not a virgin" would invoke shock and get people's attention. It did, but there was nothing in the film that was worth any attention. 4) The director is an idiot again. He thought that (pseudo) feminist topics would get him the attention he needed as this is a trend. Quote
BUDDY Posted March 12, 2017 Report Posted March 12, 2017 1 hour ago, MindRinger said: There are a few problems with the drainage that I have quoted here. Rape and virginity are two entirely different subjects of discussion. 1) The female never actually confesses to the person of interest that she was raped. Instead, she tells the guy in a challenging tone that she is not a virgin, as if that was something to be proud of. It is nothing to be ashamed of either. If you have an issue, convey it in a serious tone. 2) 33.7 kilometers is the minimum distance that needs to be maintained from females of this type. 3) The director is an idiot. Apart from the ridiculously stupid scenes, he wrongfully assumed that the contrast of the words "Sita" and "I'm not a virgin" would invoke shock and get people's attention. It did, but there was nothing in the film that was worth any attention. 4) The director is an idiot again. He thought that (pseudo) feminist topics would get him the attention he needed as this is a trend. Quote
4Vikram Posted March 12, 2017 Report Posted March 12, 2017 1 hour ago, MindRinger said: There are a few problems with the drainage that I have quoted here. Rape and virginity are two entirely different subjects of discussion. 1) The female never actually confesses to the person of interest that she was raped. Instead, she tells the guy in a challenging tone that she is not a virgin, as if that was something to be proud of. It is nothing to be ashamed of either. If you have an issue, convey it in a serious tone. 2) 33.7 kilometers is the minimum distance that needs to be maintained from females of this type. 3) The director is an idiot. Apart from the ridiculously stupid scenes, he wrongfully assumed that the contrast of the words "Sita" and "I'm not a virgin" would invoke shock and get people's attention. It did, but there was nothing in the film that was worth any attention. 4) The director is an idiot again. He thought that (pseudo) feminist topics would get him the attention he needed as this is a trend. Quote
samaja_varagamana Posted March 12, 2017 Report Posted March 12, 2017 3 hours ago, MindRinger said: There are a few problems with the drainage that I have quoted here. Rape and virginity are two entirely different subjects of discussion. 1) The female never actually confesses to the person of interest that she was raped. Instead, she tells the guy in a challenging tone that she is not a virgin, as if that was something to be proud of. It is nothing to be ashamed of either. If you have an issue, convey it in a serious tone. 2) 33.7 kilometers is the minimum distance that needs to be maintained from females of this type. 3) The director is an idiot. Apart from the ridiculously stupid scenes, he wrongfully assumed that the contrast of the words "Sita" and "I'm not a virgin" would invoke shock and get people's attention. It did, but there was nothing in the film that was worth any attention. 4) The director is an idiot again. He thought that (pseudo) feminist topics would get him the attention he needed as this is a trend. Are u pea sized intellectual who worked for narayana and sri chaitanya as a junior lecturer Quote
samaja_varagamana Posted March 12, 2017 Report Posted March 12, 2017 4 hours ago, kiladi bullodu said: @samaja_varagamana @samajaaragamana Next levelbro ty for sharing i had ejaculation. N happy tears Quote
mastercheif Posted March 12, 2017 Report Posted March 12, 2017 7 hours ago, samaja_varagamana said: Are u pea sized intellectual who worked for narayana and sri chaitanya as a junior lecturer peas ante batanilu kada man ? Quote
ronitreddy Posted March 13, 2017 Report Posted March 13, 2017 On 3/11/2017 at 11:12 PM, 4Vikram said: entidi maaketidi antuna Maaku endi idi antuna..Aa TV9 endi..Aa director/lady/advocate endi idantha..Maaku ee karma endi antuna Quote
4Vikram Posted March 13, 2017 Report Posted March 13, 2017 4 minutes ago, ronitreddy said: Maaku endi idi antuna..Aa TV9 endi..Aa director aa lady aa advocate endi idantha..Maaku ee karma endi antuna endi ee racha nuvu motham video kuda susnava? cinema fast forward la 10 mins susi picha lite tiskuna... inka ee program okati.. Quote
ronitreddy Posted March 13, 2017 Report Posted March 13, 2017 4 minutes ago, 4Vikram said: endi ee racha nuvu motham video kuda susnava? cinema fast forward la 10 mins susi picha lite tiskuna... inka ee program okati.. Sudale..Koncham chusi mind block ayindi saar Feature films ke dikku ledu..Short films mida endi mey ee racha.. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.