Hindus are thugs who killed Muslims, to blame for Partition, say Pak textbooks

[sid_22]

Pakistani high school student Noman Afzal knows “traitorous” Hindus are to blame for the bloodshed that erupted when British India split into two nations 70 years ago. His history textbook tells him so.

Students across the border in India are taught a starkly different version of events, the result of a decades-long effort by the nuclear-armed rivals to shape and control history to their own nationalistic narrative.

The official unwillingness to confront the bitter legacy of Partition -- and the skewed portrayals being peddled in classrooms from New Delhi to Karachi -- is hindering any hope of reconciliation between the arch-rivals, experts say.

August marks 70 years since the subcontinent was divided into two independent states -- Hindu-majority India and Muslim-majority Pakistan -- and millions were uprooted in one of the largest mass migrations in history.

An untold number of people -- some estimates say up two million -- died in the savage violence that followed, as Hindus and Muslims fleeing for their new homelands turned on one another, raping and butchering in genocidal retribution.

The carnage sowed the seeds for the acrimony that prevails today between India and Pakistan, and generations later this defining moment in the subcontinent’s history is still polarised by nationalism and rancour.

In a government-approved grade five history textbook used in schools in Pakistan’s Baluchistan province, Hindus are described as “thugs” who “massacred Muslims, confiscated their property, and forced them to leave India”.

“They looked down upon us, that is why we created Pakistan,” said 17-year-old Afzal from Pakistan’s Punjab province, reeling off a stock answer from his history textbook.

On the other side of the border, Mumbai schoolboy Triaksh Mitra learned how Mahatma Gandhi fought for a unified India free from British subjugation while the Muslim League -- the political party led by Pakistan’s founder Muhammad Ali Jinnah -- sided with the colonial rulers to carve out their own nation.

“But what they hadn’t really told us was the Muslim side of it,” the 15-year-old said of his Partition studies.

 

[gilly]

vammo inka e post evaru chudalooo vallu chudaley

chusthey minimum 10pages pothadhi 

[perugu_vada]

[lazybugger]

Indians ki correct history telusa? aa telusa ani aduguthunna..

but sarey ley, Pakistan lo anti Hindu propaganda undhi anedhi vastavamey. point conceded.

but saduvukunna Indians stupids laaga argue cheyyatam maanithey better.

btw, 17-yr old Afzal from Punjabi Pakistan's answer to why Pakistan was created is exactly right.

Congress (the hindutva party of early 20th century) disagreed to create separate electorates for muslims, and that made muslim league lose all their seats in elections in 1937. And subsequent actions of the 'Hindu' congress party started the mass movement for creation of Pakistan.

Hindutva will always divide the nation. this is universal truth from this small piece of history.

[lazybugger]

Anyway I support Hindutva now, because I hope another division takes place.

[lazybugger]

you can hate me all you want. blind faith in India is not going to save your country.

all the best.  

[pulibidda]

Just now, lazybugger said:

you can hate me all you want. blind faith in India is not going to save your country.

all the best.  

[Vaampire]

Evadiki favorable ga vallu raasukuntunaru

Manam chinnapudu chadivina history kooda indian version ey kada. Not a neutral version

[lazybugger]

Just now, Vaampire said:

Evadiki favorable ga vallu raasukuntunaru

Manam chinnapudu chadivina history kooda indian version ey kada. Not a neutral version

Indian version does not call muslims names.

but ofcourse as indians grow up, they learn to use such names for muslims from their surroundings. They even call it commonsense.