Best Indian movie of the year I watched so far

[tennisluvr]

2 minutes ago, dakumangalsingh said:

Intaki cult classic varjun reddy chusinava

Yes

[tennisluvr]

3 minutes ago, dakumangalsingh said:

Best Indian movie of the year ani cheppadaniki nuvvu anni movies anni languages lo cover cheyali ankul 

Best Indian movie among the ones I watched ani clear ga title lo petta choodu ila antarani telise. 

[tennisluvr]

49 minutes ago, 4Vikram said:

seems like based on true story, kncham aa story background tell man 

http://www.millenniumpost.in/dhananjoy-chatterjee--an-innocent-person-judicially-killed-by-the-state-161059

@chittimallu2

[tortoise]

5 minutes ago, samaja_varagamana said:

Mummy ante @vendetta 

Big boss house afdb lo 

Vendetta naku poriki match fix chesindi dowry dagara disputes ayyi after engagement nannu lyt theskunaru

I want amswers now from @Pori n vendy

sweet narration 

[Vishwaksena]

I didn't see this movie but I know the case. I remember his execution was covered widely by the press. His was the last execution until Afzal Guru's almost 9 years later.

[tennisluvr]

3 minutes ago, Vishwaksena said:

I didn't see this movie but I know the case. I remember his execution was covered widely by the press. His was the last execution until Afzal Guru's almost 9 years later.

His was the only execution in post independent India's history where the accused was put to death in a case not involving terrorism. 

Plus his was the only death where the verdict was passed purely by circumstantial evidence with no direct eye witness, and no DNA testing of any sort done on him and the victim. 

In short, he was just killed to prove a point that India takes issues of rape as rarest of the rare crimes. Doesn't look like killing one poor innocent person has reduced the number of rape incidents going by the statistics though, so the whole purpose of killing him was quite pointless. 

Read this http://www.millenniumpost.in/dhananjoy-chatterjee--an-innocent-person-judicially-killed-by-the-state-161059

[4Vikram]

6 minutes ago, tennisluvr said:

http://www.millenniumpost.in/dhananjoy-chatterjee--an-innocent-person-judicially-killed-by-the-state-161059

@chittimallu2

thanks will read 

[4Vikram]

1 minute ago, tennisluvr said:

His was the only execution in post independent India's history where the accused was put to death in a case not involving terrorism. 

Plus his was the only death where the verdict was passed purely by circumstantial evidence with no direct eye witness, and no DNA testing of any sort done on him and the victim. 

In short, he was just killed to prove a point that India takes issues of rape as rarest of the rare crimes. Doesn't look like killing one poor innocent person has reduced the number of rape incidents going by the statistics though, so the whole purpose of killing him was quite pointless. 

ante he was killed for being innocent aa vuncle?

[ARYA]

ARJUN

REDDY

[tennisluvr]

4 minutes ago, 4Vikram said:

ante he was killed for being innocent aa vuncle?

He was killed based on circumstantial evidence that was mostly proved to be quite contradictory. The state wanted him dead as well due to political pressures and media pressure. 

[dakumangalsingh]

15 minutes ago, tennisluvr said:

Best Indian movie among the ones I watched ani clear ga title lo petta choodu ila antarani telise. 

Lol ankul db pulse neeku telsu 

[Vishwaksena]

3 minutes ago, tennisluvr said:

His was the only execution in post independent India's history where the accused was put to death in a case not involving terrorism. 

Plus his was the only death where the verdict was passed purely by circumstantial evidence with no direct eye witness, and no DNA testing of any sort done on him and the victim. 

In short, he was just killed to prove a point that India takes issues of rape as rarest of the rare crimes. Doesn't look like killing one poor innocent person has reduced the number of rape incidents going by the statistics though, so the whole purpose of killing him was quite pointless. 

Read this http://www.millenniumpost.in/dhananjoy-chatterjee--an-innocent-person-judicially-killed-by-the-state-161059

India's position on rarest of rare crimes is a slippery slope and very vague in characterization. I agree that conviction based on circumstantial evidence is utterly disgusting considering he would be facing a noose.

Same with Talvar's case. The parents got convicted purely based on circumstantial evidence. The UP police's inability in properly conducting an investigation and CBI's further mess made it impossible to catch the real criminals. So they went after the parents.

PS: I am against capital punishment. I just don't think the state should have the right to execute it's own citizen no matter what the crime is

[dakumangalsingh]

1 minute ago, tennisluvr said:

He was killed based on circumstantial evidence that was mostly proved to be quite contradictory. The state wanted him dead as well due to political pressures and media pressure. 

Was that rape of a foreign national or 13 yr school kid ?? 

[Vishwaksena]

9 minutes ago, tennisluvr said:

His was the only execution in post independent India's history where the accused was put to death in a case not involving terrorism. 

Plus his was the only death where the verdict was passed purely by circumstantial evidence with no direct eye witness, and no DNA testing of any sort done on him and the victim. 

In short, he was just killed to prove a point that India takes issues of rape as rarest of the rare crimes. Doesn't look like killing one poor innocent person has reduced the number of rape incidents going by the statistics though, so the whole purpose of killing him was quite pointless. 

Read this http://www.millenniumpost.in/dhananjoy-chatterjee--an-innocent-person-judicially-killed-by-the-state-161059

I think this is not true. We have had several executions before. May be you meant in the 21st century, not post independence

[tennisluvr]

Just now, Vishwaksena said:

India's position on rarest of rare crimes is a slippery slope and very vague in characterization. I agree that conviction based on circumstantial evidence is utterly disgusting considering he would be facing a noose.

Same with Talvar's case. The parents got convicted purely based on circumstantial evidence. The UP police's inability in properly conducting an investigation and CBI's further mess made it impossible to catch the real criminals. So they went after the parents.

PS: I am against capital punishment. I just don't think the state should have the right to execute it's own citizen no matter what the crime is

India's position on determining what's the rarest of the rare crime is heavily dependent on the pressures of the ruling party, votebank politics and media pressure. In such a case, the judiciary which is supposed to be independent of political affiliations can hardly be expected to act in an independent manner. He was killed simply because they needed a scapegoat, and being a poor person that couldn't afford to hire an expensive lawyer to represent himself in court paid the price with his life. 

Plus he belonged to the upper caste although he was poor, which sits quite favorably with the media bias. If he were someone from the lower castes of the society I am sure the media's portrayal of him would have been much more sympathetic and they would have perhaps even accused the courts and police of being partisan due to his caste. In this poor guy's case, his caste couldn't help him gain and win that sympathy.