4Vikram Posted October 21, 2017 Author Report Posted October 21, 2017 24 minutes ago, uttermost said: okay. Now we'll play a game. you should name a ruler (feel free to name Hindu rulers) that you think was kind and compassionate and didn't kill his own people. Then I search on the web to get you instances of where they ruled as cruelly as the Mughals did. okay? Are we trying to prove anyone good or bad here? Quote
uttermost Posted October 21, 2017 Report Posted October 21, 2017 Just now, 4Vikram said: Are we trying to prove anyone good or bad here? Weren't you trying to? all kings were products of their times. And all of them are glorified in our history books. Mughals were more glorified because their history is recent, and they ruled for a long time over a long area. The idea of a 'king' itself is disgusting. History should be taught from the perspective of life of a person living in that point of time. History is not about which king ruled and how he ruled. They can mention the king, but focusing on the king too much is useless. Actually history should not be taught at all at school. Its useless. let people learn about it in college. Quote
uttermost Posted October 21, 2017 Report Posted October 21, 2017 9 minutes ago, 4Vikram said: Are we trying to prove anyone good or bad here? All kings are assholes. That's why we have democracy now. Quote
Bhai Posted October 21, 2017 Report Posted October 21, 2017 2 hours ago, uttermost said: Weren't you trying to? all kings were products of their times. And all of them are glorified in our history books. Mughals were more glorified because their history is recent, and they ruled for a long time over a long area. The idea of a 'king' itself is disgusting. History should be taught from the perspective of life of a person living in that point of time. History is not about which king ruled and how he ruled. They can mention the king, but focusing on the king too much is useless. Actually history should not be taught at all at school. Its useless. let people learn about it in college. adanthe le... telisi kooda dugutunnav. Quote
uttermost Posted October 21, 2017 Report Posted October 21, 2017 12 minutes ago, Bhai said: adanthe le... telisi kooda dugutunnav. athanu posted this thread in the spirit of sharing information anta 4vikram laanti oka musugu anti-muslim fella ledu anukunta ee db lo. enduku antha shy feel avthado artham kaadhu. he's with people who agree with him no? Quote
batman Posted October 21, 2017 Report Posted October 21, 2017 2 hours ago, uttermost said: All kings are assholes. That's why we have democracy now. so modi is a king or product of democracy?? Quote
Bhai Posted October 21, 2017 Report Posted October 21, 2017 18 minutes ago, uttermost said: athanu posted this thread in the spirit of sharing information anta 4vikram laanti oka musugu anti-muslim fella ledu anukunta ee db lo. enduku antha shy feel avthado artham kaadhu. he's with people who agree with him no? he selectively gives a pass to Ashoka who killed his own brothers but reminds us about aurangazeb i am sure he is not even aware of maratha killings of Orissa & bengal civilians Quote
uttermost Posted October 21, 2017 Report Posted October 21, 2017 3 minutes ago, batman said: so modi is a king or product of democracy?? feudal uppercaste society that has no qualms about quashing the poor to get what it wants. Quote
uttermost Posted October 21, 2017 Report Posted October 21, 2017 Just now, Bhai said: he selectively gives a pass to Ashoka who killed his own brothers but reminds us about aurangazeb i am sure he is not even aware of maratha killings of Orissa & bengal civilians what are you talking. India is 5000 yrs old. everybody used to live like one happy family until Ghori invaded. Quote
pirangi Posted October 21, 2017 Report Posted October 21, 2017 read P N Oak "Some Missing Chapters Of World" "was Akbar Great" Table of Contents: The Need to Revise Basic Archaeological And Historical Concepts India's History Has been Written By Her Enemies The Definition And Scope of History How Historians Have Duped the Public Rewriting History-Why And How? Muslim Contribution (?) To Indian Life How Archaeological Record Has Been Falsified Cunningham's Cunning Archaeological Manipulation Mediaeval Architecture is Hindu Not Muslim Invader Tamerlain Says Old Delhi's Jama Masjid is a Hindu Temple The Pandavas, Not Shahjahan Founded Old Delhi Delhi's Red Fort is Hindu Lalkot Lovers And Architects Akbar's So-called Marriages Wee Blatant Abductions Words And Phrases Which Exude History Research Methodology and Howlers of History Scholars Criteria to Test the Existence of an Ancient Hindu Empire Traces of an Hindu World Empire The Ancient Atlas Bore All Sanskrit Names Ayurved-The Hindu Medical System Healed The Ancient World The Entire Pacific Region was Hindu Territory Ancient England Was a Hindu Country Ancient Hindu towns And Temples in England Westminster Abbey is also a Shiva Temple English is a Dialect of Sanskrit Ancient Vedic Priesthoods of Europe Ancient Italy was a Hindu Country and the Pope a Hindu Priest Arabia, Iran, Iraq Were Once Hindu Countries The Forehead marks of the Hindus Vedic Terminology in European Languages Rama and Krishna Were Universal Gods The Myth of Jesus Christ Disgusting State of World History Wrong History Leads to Horrors Quote
uttermost Posted October 21, 2017 Report Posted October 21, 2017 PN Oak I thought this madman was discredited 10yrs ago when he claimed that Tajmahal was a shiva temple or some such sh1t. Quote
batman Posted October 21, 2017 Report Posted October 21, 2017 7 minutes ago, Bhai said: he selectively gives a pass to Ashoka who killed his own brothers but reminds us about aurangazeb i am sure he is not even aware of maratha killings of Orissa & bengal civilians yes marathas did do excess in bengal and most hindu kings of medival india aren't amarendra bahubali, but nothing can compare to the savagery and barbaric cruelty perpetrated by the turaka arseholes in india Quote
batman Posted October 21, 2017 Report Posted October 21, 2017 10 minutes ago, uttermost said: feudal uppercaste society that has no qualms about quashing the poor to get what it wants. dont contradict yourself. you said democracy which is rule of the majority. so in india feudal uppercaste non-poor are majority? Quote
uttermost Posted October 21, 2017 Report Posted October 21, 2017 1 minute ago, batman said: yes marathas did do excess in bengal and most hindu kings of medival india aren't amarendra bahubali, but nothing can compare to the savagery and barbaric cruelty perpetrated by the turaka arseholes in india awww!!! but still 80% of India remained Hindu. Hindus are so touchy about religion that even touching their sacred thread would probably result in some poet writing about how he was insulted, castrated, etc. who the fcuk knows. because not many people are aware of history, sanghis like you can spread trash for political gains. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.