real intolerance

[uttermost]

8 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said:

2012..Muzaffarnagar riot and 2014...General elections

2018...Chandan Gupta...and 2019 general elections..

as we get closer to the elections, we can see more of such incidents...more and more..especially where there is a considerable tolerant minority population 

wow. amazing insight. 1 hindu gets killed, and all smart people come out of the woods to make bullshit predictions irrelevant to the issue on hand.

but when the opposite number is killed, 'chalta hai, this is majority rule'.

Halwa, if you don't cloak your extreme bigotry with lame jokey stuff, you'll be counted as a Hindutva extremist sympathizer.

I know you'll feel proud of this description. such is the lack of moral compass in you. Hope you atleast have made your millions through this bigotry. otherwise all this is enriching someone else. not you.

[Bhai]

1 hour ago, uttermost said:

wow. amazing insight. 1 hindu gets killed, and all smart people come out of the woods to make bullshit predictions irrelevant to the issue on hand.

but when the opposite number is killed, 'chalta hai, this is majority rule'.

Halwa, if you don't cloak your extreme bigotry with lame jokey stuff, you'll be counted as a Hindutva extremist sympathizer.

I know you'll feel proud of this description. such is the lack of moral compass in you. Hope you atleast have made your millions through this bigotry. otherwise all this is enriching someone else. not you.

amnesia batch be like 

[perugu_vada]

3 hours ago, uttermost said:

wow. amazing insight. 1 hindu gets killed, and all smart people come out of the woods to make bullshit predictions irrelevant to the issue on hand.

but when the opposite number is killed, 'chalta hai, this is majority rule'.

Halwa, if you don't cloak your extreme bigotry with lame jokey stuff, you'll be counted as a Hindutva extremist sympathizer.

I know you'll feel proud of this description. such is the lack of moral compass in you. Hope you atleast have made your millions through this bigotry. otherwise all this is enriching someone else. not you.

Uncle muzaffarnagar riots lo morethan 60were killed, also it all started with a girl being harassed by 2 guys, e db lo janallo unnatlu hatredness undatam tho dhanni 2 religions ki link chesi racha racha dobbaru

post riots more gang-rapes happened, n then dud govt sp made no arrests to none so watever

[uttermost]

7 hours ago, perugu_vada said:

Uncle muzaffarnagar riots lo morethan 60were killed, also it all started with a girl being harassed by 2 guys, e db lo janallo unnatlu hatredness undatam tho dhanni 2 religions ki link chesi racha racha dobbaru

post riots more gang-rapes happened, n then dud govt sp made no arrests to none so watever

vankulu, your point is somewhat irrelevant here. okay, you decided to respond to my comment and not to the original thread. okay. still there were arrests made in muzaffarnagar. on both sides.

I was responding to the TS quip that nobody wants to talk intolerance in this case. There's a good reason why that is so. because minority intolerance is nothing in front of majority intolerance. plus, if you read reports, a muslim group who were simply hoisting an Indian flag were needlessly provoked.

still, the person who shot should and will be arrested. that's how Indian system works. compared to the guy who killed a man accusing him of having beef in his house, and attracted all kinds of positive attention from the ruling govt.

Hindu intolerance is a million times more dangerous than muslim intolerance in India. simple.

even muzaffarnagar started when with a muslim was killed, and retaliatory lynching by muslim mobs. If you want to call it 'Hindus under attack', and not admit that Jats in that area are notoriously aggressive, along with muslims, and it was simply a clash of two landed and somewhat influential groups.

 

[uttermost]

7 hours ago, perugu_vada said:

Uncle muzaffarnagar riots lo morethan 60were killed, also it all started with a girl being harassed by 2 guys, e db lo janallo unnatlu hatredness undatam tho dhanni 2 religions ki link chesi racha racha dobbaru

post riots more gang-rapes happened, n then dud govt sp made no arrests to none so watever

majority intolerance requires pointing out.

minority intolerance is often handled by the law.

In India majority actually claims that they are peaceful and tolerant, when they are obviously not. that's why it requires reiteration.

technically they are not majority. but they use the Hindu tag whenever convenient to call themselves majority, and then call themselves by their caste when the Hindu tag is not useful.

[Bhai]

[chittimallu2]

On 1/28/2018 at 12:45 AM, uttermost said:

hmm..

nobody will return awards, because the govt will take action against the people responsible in this case, and not defend the people. So nothing to 'question'.

about feeling intolerant. this is just another incident added to the intolerant climate in the country.

I think twitter is full of conflicting povs on what actually took place. everybody is talking about it, but twitter has probably blocked it from trending, like they do in all communal clashes.

what exactly about this, felt different to you? because after dozens of reports of Hindu aggression, finally one Hindu was martryed ? Are you sure that in this case it wasn't Hindus who started the commotion that got out of hand and got a person killed?

if you ask me, Hindu groups triggered the violence. whats the point in going to a muslim group who were simply trying to hoist the Indian flag in their area, and mocking them about being from pakistan.

If I'm being less charitable, these Hindu groups messed with the wrong group (not generalizing muslims here, but that particular group that had the werewithal to respond), and paid the price.

What does that have to govt taking the action or not? Point is why arent they questioning how a man was killed for raising pro India slogans?

rest of your rant doesnt even make sense to me and/or is irrelevant here. Your question "Are you sure that in this case it wasn't Hindus who started the commotion that got out of hand and got a person killed?" sums it up all. No one is sure about any incident that has happened, happening or will happen unless he/she is present in that place so better cut that non sensical question since the same could be asked to anything and everything thats happening around.

[chittimallu2]

On 1/28/2018 at 12:50 AM, uttermost said:

If you have a version where the person who died was innocent, pls tell.

ofcourse still, its a criminal case, and the person who shot should be prosecuted. But not worthy enough to lament 'intolerance', because the person who got shot was from the intolerant batch. Not an innocent victim.

 

From what I read, the guy who was killed was in a rally raising hindustan zindabad or that sorts of slogans in a muslim dominated area which triggered the peacefuls and rustled some jimmies.

Fine, go ahead and label him intolerant because he raised pro india slogans... just to win an argument over the internet.... but not to actually address the problem or answer my initial question

[chittimallu2]

On 1/28/2018 at 10:38 AM, uttermost said:

wow. amazing insight. 1 hindu gets killed, and all smart people come out of the woods to make bullshit predictions irrelevant to the issue on hand.

but when the opposite number is killed, 'chalta hai, this is majority rule'.

Halwa, if you don't cloak your extreme bigotry with lame jokey stuff, you'll be counted as a Hindutva extremist sympathizer.

I know you'll feel proud of this description. such is the lack of moral compass in you. Hope you atleast have made your millions through this bigotry. otherwise all this is enriching someone else. not you.

point is not about a hindu getting killed... I wouldnt have posted this if he was raising any communal slogans which got him killed... he was in a pro india rally on a republic day... not even sure what is "hindu" about that?

[kingcasanova]

On 1/28/2018 at 1:03 PM, TRUMP said:

orei nuvu nijamga matured person ayithe.. denikaina let go type attitude undali. ne bathuku prathi daniki kukka moriginattu morugutav enduku ra gutle.

ne bathuku lu na chippa.ye edava db la neeku la time spend cheyyadu. neeku kuda posts eyyaniki dabbulu istunaru ante cheppu. ika ninnu evadu gelkadu.. chal poramboku

kukkalu feel avuthaayi

[batman2]

On 1/28/2018 at 1:45 AM, uttermost said:

hmm..

nobody will return awards, because the govt will take action against the people responsible in this case, and not defend the people. So nothing to 'question'.

about feeling intolerant. this is just another incident added to the intolerant climate in the country.

I think twitter is full of conflicting povs on what actually took place. everybody is talking about it, but twitter has probably blocked it from trending, like they do in all communal clashes.

what exactly about this, felt different to you? because after dozens of reports of Hindu aggression, finally one Hindu was martryed ? Are you sure that in this case it wasn't Hindus who started the commotion that got out of hand and got a person killed?

if you ask me, Hindu groups triggered the violence. whats the point in going to a muslim group who were simply trying to hoist the Indian flag in their area, and mocking them about being from pakistan.

If I'm being less charitable, these Hindu groups messed with the wrong group (not generalizing muslims here, but that particular group that had the werewithal to respond), and paid the price.

arey  yedhava ndtv lo gudisi ikkada vachi vagaku......

[batman2]

On 1/28/2018 at 11:26 AM, Android_Halwa said:

2012..Muzaffarnagar riot and 2014...General elections

2018...Chandan Gupta...and 2019 general elections..

as we get closer to the elections, we can see more of such incidents...more and more..especially where there is a considerable tolerant minority population 

exactly.....tolerant minority vallu republic celebrations cheskunte.....ee chandan gupta gang saffron flag tho  vachi disturd chesinru......appudu peaceful minority gallu peaceful ga revolver tho shooted.....wow entha tolerant peaceful minority

[batman2]

On 1/28/2018 at 10:59 PM, uttermost said:

vankulu, your point is somewhat irrelevant here. okay, you decided to respond to my comment and not to the original thread. okay. still there were arrests made in muzaffarnagar. on both sides.

I was responding to the TS quip that nobody wants to talk intolerance in this case. There's a good reason why that is so. because minority intolerance is nothing in front of majority intolerance. plus, if you read reports, a muslim group who were simply hoisting an Indian flag were needlessly provoked.

still, the person who shot should and will be arrested. that's how Indian system works. compared to the guy who killed a man accusing him of having beef in his house, and attracted all kinds of positive attention from the ruling govt.

Hindu intolerance is a million times more dangerous than muslim intolerance in India. simple.

even muzaffarnagar started when with a muslim was killed, and retaliatory lynching by muslim mobs. If you want to call it 'Hindus under attack', and not admit that Jats in that area are notoriously aggressive, along with muslims, and it was simply a clash of two landed and somewhat influential groups.

 

wow what a logic moron......so are gaurakshaks also needlessly provoked???

[uttermost]

9 hours ago, chittimallu2 said:

From what I read, the guy who was killed was in a rally raising hindustan zindabad or that sorts of slogans in a muslim dominated area which triggered the peacefuls and rustled some jimmies.

Fine, go ahead and label him intolerant because he raised pro india slogans... just to win an argument over the internet.... but not to actually address the problem or answer my initial question

The group was raising India flag on Independence day. so why would they have a problem with someone saying pro India slogans? do you understand goondagiri, or are you acting innocent?

9 hours ago, chittimallu2 said:

What does that have to govt taking the action or not? Point is why arent they questioning how a man was killed for raising pro India slogans?

rest of your rant doesnt even make sense to me and/or is irrelevant here. Your question "Are you sure that in this case it wasn't Hindus who started the commotion that got out of hand and got a person killed?" sums it up all. No one is sure about any incident that has happened, happening or will happen unless he/she is present in that place so better cut that non sensical question since the same could be asked to anything and everything thats happening around.

who do you want to question? and whom should the question be addressed to?

dude, people can raise slogans against a govt. you see, there's a clear target there. An institution that exists to maintain order. that's why they are questioned.

you want people to question whom? the muslims? lol. how does anyone question muslims (a group of people), pls tell. you want someone to come on TV and question muslims? or was there a particular organization that deserves to be questioned in this case?

 

 

[uttermost]

9 hours ago, chittimallu2 said:

point is not about a hindu getting killed... I wouldnt have posted this if he was raising any communal slogans which got him killed... he was in a pro india rally on a republic day... not even sure what is "hindu" about that?

ofcourse he was raising communal slogans. what do you think groups of hindus do when they want to intimidate muslims? sri krishna commission clearly says that almost all communal incidents are triggered by Hindus. It was true in the 90s, and its probably true now too.

anyway, he didn't deserve to be killed or anything. just that the way you frame the entire event is wrong.

If you want assholes liike me to talk about this. I won't. I don't intend to be neutral, when I'm surrounded by Hindutva spouting people. I'll definitely do it, when in liberal company (which is becoming extremely rare these days). Almost every liberal I know is a closet right wing now.