okay cryptomaniacs, I have a question.

[uttermost]

Is there a crypto coin that decentralizes the internet? Not that I think blockchain is a necessary or even useful tool for such decentralization.

simple search got me bleh tools for decentralizing storage (storj), DNS (namecoin), web hosting, for all which better decentraliized services exist without a blockchain already.

I want a completely free internet, like in Freenet (freenet.org), or like Firechat that was used to completely bypass the internet when Chinese cut it off in HongKong couple years back.

 

[uttermost]

Go make one. and pls let me know when you made it.

I will participate in its ICO.

[uttermost]

actually, I have an idea. make money by claiming to decentralize Internet with some half baked white paper on how it'd work.

swindle people off all money, and turn around and accomplish the same without blockchain.

if you think of it, blockchain is a crap tech that can't handle this problem.

[uttermost]

I'll still buy your ICO, so I can sell it ats its peak when morons start buying.

[uttermost]

okay. what do I mean by decentralizing Internet?

simple. No need to pay the ISP for the internet. No need to be beholden to TLDs, you host on your computer and give away stuff for free.

Its actually conceptually easy. technically somewhat hard to accomplish. in practice, it's a nightmare.

so pls do it. I don't like to burden myself with problems. also I have to bring down corporations. so no time.

just think. with a good search engine (not the crappy google), you could look up literally anything and download it off other people's machines, and no one could threaten you with lawsuits.

[uttermost]

Yeah, I want to free the physical infra itself. Not just bypassing DNS, and using encrypted onion servers.

[princeofheaven]

1 hour ago, uttermost said:

okay. what do I mean by decentralizing Internet?

simple. No need to pay the ISP for the internet. No need to be beholden to TLDs, you host on your computer and give away stuff for free.

Its actually conceptually easy. technically somewhat hard to accomplish. in practice, it's a nightmare.

so pls do it. I don't like to burden myself with problems. also I have to bring down corporations. so no time.

just think. with a good search engine (not the crappy google), you could look up literally anything and download it off other people's machines, and no one could threaten you with lawsuits.

how willl you interconnect the machines without physical gateways and who will maintain such links without isp. One way a guy thought was to daisy chain peoples wifi but it is far fetched.

the second part is partly done by torrents

[uttermost]

1 hour ago, princeofheaven said:

how willl you interconnect the machines without physical gateways and who will maintain such links without isp. One way a guy thought was to daisy chain peoples wifi but it is far fetched.

the second part is partly done by torrents

check freenet.org, and I've seen Firechat work when china completely cut off internet in hongkong.. gateways not needed if the internet is redesigned as a mesh network.

[Quickgun_murugan]

3 hours ago, uttermost said:

Is there a crypto coin that decentralizes the internet? Not that I think blockchain is a necessary or even useful tool for such decentralization.

simple search got me bleh tools for decentralizing storage (storj), DNS (namecoin), web hosting, for all which better decentraliized services exist without a blockchain already.

I want a completely free internet, like in Freenet (freenet.org), or like Firechat that was used to completely bypass the internet when Chinese cut it off in HongKong couple years back.

 

Kucoin lo CoinFi undi soodu 

[RubberBaloo]

3 hours ago, uttermost said:

check freenet.org, and I've seen Firechat work when china completely cut off internet in hongkong.. gateways not needed if the internet is redesigned as a mesh network.

nuvvem matladutunnavo neeku ardham autundaaa... mesh network aa.. it is still an interconnected NETWORK from what you say 

[uttermost]

3 minutes ago, RubberBaloo said:

nuvvem matladutunnavo neeku ardham autundaaa... mesh network aa.. it is still an interconnected NETWORK from what you say 

what???? chitti kanna what the fcuk is an 'interconnected network'. adhi kooda bold caps lo.

I know exactly what i'm talking about.

I said a mesh network doesn't need a gateway. who said its not a network. what kind of moron are you? the kind that reads computer networks text, and remembers only the text, and forgets the meaning?

[uttermost]

2 hours ago, Quickgun_murugan said:

Kucoin lo CoinFi undi soodu 

uncle. adhi edho financial market intelligence program.

[RubberBaloo]

2 minutes ago, uttermost said:

what???? chitti kanna what the fcuk is an 'interconnected network'. adhi kooda bold caps lo.

I know exactly what i'm talking about.

I said a mesh network doesn't need a gateway. who said its not a network. what kind of moron are you? the kind that reads computer networks text, and remembers only the text, and forgets the meaning?

only way you know how to reply is to swear at people?? naaku kooda chaala boothulu vachu. but unlike u im cool and decent.

rendallalo heart attach vachi poyelaa unnav ga.. .

[uttermost]

2 minutes ago, RubberBaloo said:

only way you know how to reply is to swear at people?? naaku kooda chaala boothulu vachu. but unlike u im cool and decent.

rendallalo heart attach vachi poyelaa unnav ga.. .

lol. so neeku matter ledhu. boothu ani cheppi tappinchukuntunnav. vadiley.

[RubberBaloo]

2 minutes ago, uttermost said:

lol. so neeku matter ledhu. boothu ani cheppi tappinchukuntunnav. vadiley.

yeh, thats your attitude.. thats how you want to justify your reaction.. I dont converse with people who dont even know how to start a decent conversation or give a decent reply. you could have replied like a normal person would but you chose to react like a maniac.. y should i engage in conversation with people like you? 

anywys matter anav kabatti, aa topic ki vaste. what i meant when I said it is still a network, physical hardware is still needed to support that network which requires investment. which again brings back the same issue you are raising.. that being said I dont like to converse with you anymore..