dasara_bullodu Posted March 11, 2018 Report Posted March 11, 2018 If you look at the Rahul Gandhi speech, most of the things he mentioned wasn't actually implemented by his family. But in a way, he is right. Take Green revolution. Nehru, with his idiotic soviet style focus on Industrialization left India on the brink of starvation. India had to import wheat from US to satiate our hunger. We had no crops LBS saved us by implementing it. Not the Gandhi Family. Same with White Revolution. India was importing Milk powder from New Zealand because we didn't have milk. It was clear by 1959, that Anand revolution was working. But Chachaji didn't move his ass. It was again LBS to the rescue. Not the Gandhi Family. Rahul spoke about liberilization. Well, of the preceeding 20 years, 16 of them were ruled by the Gandhis. 4 of them with 2/3 majority And what happened. India's forex reserves were so low in 91 that we were about to default Liberalization was not a strategy. It was a necessity And more importantly it was done by Narasimha Rao..not the Gandhi family. So Mr Rahul Gandhi, whether you like it or not, your family has done Jack for our country. Quote
princeofheaven Posted March 11, 2018 Report Posted March 11, 2018 2 minutes ago, dasara_bullodu said: If you look at the Rahul Gandhi speech, most of the things he mentioned wasn't actually implemented by his family. But in a way, he is right. Take Green revolution. Nehru, with his idiotic soviet style focus on Industrialization left India on the brink of starvation. India had to import wheat from US to satiate our hunger. We had no crops LBS saved us by implementing it. Not the Gandhi Family. Same with White Revolution. India was importing Milk powder from New Zealand because we didn't have milk. It was clear by 1959, that Anand revolution was working. But Chachaji didn't move his ass. It was again LBS to the rescue. Not the Gandhi Family. Rahul spoke about liberilization. Well, of the preceeding 20 years, 16 of them were ruled by the Gandhis. 4 of them with 2/3 majority And what happened. India's forex reserves were so low in 91 that we were about to default Liberalization was not a strategy. It was a necessity And more importantly it was done by Narasimha Rao..not the Gandhi family. So Mr Rahul Gandhi, whether you like it or not, your family has done Jack for our country. It would have been good if they really did jack but they screwed the country Quote
dasara_bullodu Posted March 11, 2018 Author Report Posted March 11, 2018 4 minutes ago, princeofheaven said: It would have been good if they really did jack but they screwed the country Congress don't want to let go of dynasty regime no matter what Quote
perugu_vada Posted March 11, 2018 Report Posted March 11, 2018 Edit chesaru congress vallu to make him look a great leader anichupinchataniki ani news channels lo osthondi ga ? Ofcourse not in liberal biased channels anukondi, andhulo edited version ye ostondi anukondi Quote
perugu_vada Posted March 11, 2018 Report Posted March 11, 2018 7 hours ago, dasara_bullodu said: Congress don't want to let go of dynasty regime no matter what Be it in central or state, family politics ki slaves unnantha kalam hereditary annadhi podhu politics lo in india Quote
dasara_bullodu Posted March 11, 2018 Author Report Posted March 11, 2018 8 minutes ago, perugu_vada said: Be it in central or state, family politics ki slaves unnantha kalam hereditary annadhi podhu politics lo in india I don't understand rationale behind family politics...mana pai manager koduku ni next manager cheste ne manam oppukom...pm cm ela chestaro janam Quote
perugu_vada Posted March 12, 2018 Report Posted March 12, 2018 3 hours ago, dasara_bullodu said: I don't understand rationale behind family politics...mana pai manager koduku ni next manager cheste ne manam oppukom...pm cm ela chestaro janam That is called SLAVERY man family politics/heroes ni support chesey slaves ni adagali Quote
uttermost Posted March 12, 2018 Report Posted March 12, 2018 3 hours ago, dasara_bullodu said: I don't understand rationale behind family politics...mana pai manager koduku ni next manager cheste ne manam oppukom...pm cm ela chestaro janam its surprising that for someone who spends a lot of time thinking of realpoliticks, you don't understand how family politics is beneficial. its simple. family politics is like a son taking over father's business empire. Not a son taking over a father's job. Its not a job that can be passed on. Its legacy. legacy that is protected by insecure fcuks in the company/party. Quote
uttermost Posted March 12, 2018 Report Posted March 12, 2018 19 minutes ago, perugu_vada said: That is called SLAVERY man family politics/heroes ni support chesey slaves ni adagali it applies to nationalism too. India ani chinchukuni, oka section of Indians ni thittey vaallu kooda slaves aey. may be not to the family, but to an ideology. Quote
futureofandhra Posted March 12, 2018 Report Posted March 12, 2018 4 hours ago, perugu_vada said: Be it in central or state, family politics ki slaves unnantha kalam hereditary annadhi podhu politics lo in india This is bullshit logic If any one is capable they should win over him Anthey Kani family politics anatam not right People can vote n bring Change Akhilesh won n lost Every political leader heir has right to contest in election n can become pm or cm like any other citizen If some people don't like it go to people with better policy and win them not by crying on family politics I accept kulam pichi is there but everyone has to educate Ekkado endhuku db lo chaduvukunna batch vundi some of them hate leaders due to caste n family Things should be issue based not on caste n family Quote
futureofandhra Posted March 12, 2018 Report Posted March 12, 2018 11 minutes ago, uttermost said: its surprising that for someone who spends a lot of time thinking of realpoliticks, you don't understand how family politics is beneficial. its simple. family politics is like a son taking over father's business empire. Not a son taking over a father's job. Its not a job that can be passed on. Its legacy. legacy that is protected by insecure fcuks in the company/party. Can any citizen contest n win election even though if he is son of political leader?? Quote
uttermost Posted March 12, 2018 Report Posted March 12, 2018 Just now, futureofandhra said: This is bullshit logic If any one is capable they should win over him Anthey Kani family politics anatam not right People can vote n bring Change Akhilesh won n lost Every political leader heir has right to contest in election n can become pm or cm like any other citizen If some people don't like it go to people with better policy and win them not by crying on family politics I accept kulam pichi is there but everyone has to educate Ekkado endhuku db lo chaduvukunna batch vundi some of them hate leaders due to caste n family Things should be issue based not on caste n family but it is family politics only. anakunda etla untaaru? without the father, the son will not even win a ward seat. and there's a reason why such politics are supported. because every collective that looks up to a 'leader' (instead of acting like a collective), will have more entrenched informal structures of power, than a for profit company will. that's why its easy to see CEO's son not take over father, but no one bats an eyelid when a political party (collective) makes the decision to install the son. Quote
uttermost Posted March 12, 2018 Report Posted March 12, 2018 3 minutes ago, futureofandhra said: Can any citizen contest n win election even though if he is son of political leader?? yes. most kids of political leaders do win elections. Quote
futureofandhra Posted March 12, 2018 Report Posted March 12, 2018 44 minutes ago, uttermost said: but it is family politics only. anakunda etla untaaru? without the father, the son will not even win a ward seat. and there's a reason why such politics are supported. because every collective that looks up to a 'leader' (instead of acting like a collective), will have more entrenched informal structures of power, than a for profit company will. that's why its easy to see CEO's son not take over father, but no one bats an eyelid when a political party (collective) makes the decision to install the son. You are right But that can't be an excuse to say since that particular is from one family he should not contest election Quote
Android_Halwa Posted March 12, 2018 Report Posted March 12, 2018 1 hour ago, futureofandhra said: This is bullshit logic If any one is capable they should win over him Anthey Kani family politics anatam not right People can vote n bring Change Akhilesh won n lost Every political leader heir has right to contest in election n can become pm or cm like any other citizen If some people don't like it go to people with better policy and win them not by crying on family politics I accept kulam pichi is there but everyone has to educate Ekkado endhuku db lo chaduvukunna batch vundi some of them hate leaders due to caste n family Things should be issue based not on caste n family Smell vastundi... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.