Bhadrachalm Pattu vastralu from Muslim rulers Qutub shahi

[Raasko]

Hyderabad, March 25: On the occasion of Ram Navami, the Sri Sitharamachandra Swamy Temple at Bhadrachalam is setting the perfect example of communal harmony on March 25, Sunday. It is believed that long time back, Hyderabad State’s Muslim rulers set a tradition of presenting tributes and gifts to the temple to mark the Ram Navami festival. Till this date, the government makes an offering of ‘mutyala talambralu’ (sacred rice mixed with pearls, saffron and turmeric) and ‘pattu vastralu’ every Ram Navami at the temple. The tradition of offering gifts by the state was started during the Qutb Shahi period and this was continued by Asaf Jahis, as told by historian Mohammad Safiullah. This heritage of passing down gifts has been kept alive by governments after Independence too. According to Saifullah, the temple at Bhadrachalam was built by Kancharla Gopanna, who was the nephew of Akkanna and Madanna- senior officials in the court of Qutb Shahi king Abul Hasan Tana Shah between 1672 and 1687.

[Raasko]

so anukunnantha yedavalem kaadu...kontha tolerance undi. Ippudaitey verey religion God's ni acknowledge chesteyney haraam antunnaru...

[Android_Halwa]

Unity in diversity

[Raasko]

2 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said:

Unity in diversity

attaa antey fatwa release chestunnaru ippudu

[jalamkamandalam]

17 minutes ago, Raasko said:

so anukunnantha yedavalem kaadu...kontha tolerance undi. Ippudaitey verey religion God's ni acknowledge chesteyney haraam antunnaru...

No that 'was' and 'is' the case.

Contrary to the stories that project Moghuls as invincible conquerors, there was a lot of resistance from the native Hindu subjects, so much so that  most of the time, they were incontrollable. Virtually only a few years during Akbar's rule was Indian sub-continent by and large at peace.

Rest other times especially Babur's, ShahJahan's and Aurangazeb's there was a wide spread resistance and there by violence.

Some rulers like Nizams of Hyderabad, Nawabs of Bengal and Awadh came to the terms with their Hindu subjects so as to ward off rebellion.

But the core principle of Islam remains/remained the same -- Idolatry is haram.

[Raasko]

16 minutes ago, jalamkamandalam said:

No that 'was' and 'is' the case.

Contrary to the stories that project Moghuls as invincible conquerors, there was a lot of resistance from the native Hindu subjects, so much so that  most of the time, they were incontrollable. Virtually only a few years during Akbar's rule was Indian sub-continent by and large at peace.

Rest other times especially Babur's, ShahJahan's and Aurangazeb's there was a wide spread resistance and there by violence.

Some rulers like Nizams of Hyderabad, Nawabs of Bengal and Awadh came to the terms with their Hindu subjects so as to ward off rebellion.

But the core principle of Islam remains/remained the same -- Idolatry is haram.

Rebellion eppudoo undi...but not entirely for religious reasons....warring factions and thousands of small kingdoms etc etc

Idol worshipping even Mohammed time lo koodaa konni years continue ayindi Kaabaa lo. Vaadu koodaa accept chesaadu as peace deal...But once he is stronger, appudu velli pagala kottaadu aa idols ni...Sarey point entantey...antha strong gaa oppose chesey vaalley kotha tradition start chesaaru endi ani...? only a pretence coz political reasons? or other reasons like....ae puttalo em snake undo..oka raayesi chooddam type aa ? 

 

 

 

[EkamBaba]

1 hour ago, Raasko said:

Hyderabad, March 25: On the occasion of Ram Navami, the Sri Sitharamachandra Swamy Temple at Bhadrachalam is setting the perfect example of communal harmony on March 25, Sunday. It is believed that long time back, Hyderabad State’s Muslim rulers set a tradition of presenting tributes and gifts to the temple to mark the Ram Navami festival. Till this date, the government makes an offering of ‘mutyala talambralu’ (sacred rice mixed with pearls, saffron and turmeric) and ‘pattu vastralu’ every Ram Navami at the temple. The tradition of offering gifts by the state was started during the Qutb Shahi period and this was continued by Asaf Jahis, as told by historian Mohammad Safiullah. This heritage of passing down gifts has been kept alive by governments after Independence too. According to Saifullah, the temple at Bhadrachalam was built by Kancharla Gopanna, who was the nephew of Akkanna and Madanna- senior officials in the court of Qutb Shahi king Abul Hasan Tana Shah between 1672 and 1687.

We Kammas don’t like this!

[Raasko]

2 minutes ago, EkamBaba said:

We Kammas don’t like this!

btw ? it is still followed in Kammam land...? 

[Paidithalli]

[jalamkamandalam]

15 minutes ago, Raasko said:

Rebellion eppudoo undi...but not entirely for religious reasons....warring factions and thousands of small kingdoms etc etc

Idol worshipping even Mohammed time lo koodaa konni years continue ayindi Kaabaa lo. Vaadu koodaa accept chesaadu as peace deal...But once he is stronger, appudu velli pagala kottaadu aa idols ni...Sarey point entantey...antha strong gaa oppose chesey vaalley kotha tradition start chesaaru endi ani...? only a pretence coz political reasons? or other reasons like....ae puttalo em snake undo..oka raayesi chooddam type aa ? 

 

 

 

Yes, Rebellion was much stronger than that projected by Congressi written History. At one point in time, Humayun was ousted from Delhi and he had to take refuge. Aurangazeb, as we know, was the real re-incarnation of Mohammad. The Communit-Congressi written Indian History painted a glory picture of Moghul Rule - that all Indians were happy and surrendered to their tolerant rule and because of that 20% of its population have been converted to Islam, by their own willing.

Yes, sometimes political, sometimes tactical, sometimes carrot & Stick approach and finally violence at the end.

Kaani paamulu pattevaadu paamu kaatuke chasthaadu annattu aiindhi Moghul/Islamic rule in India.

They were wiped out by the same violence.

 

[Kool_SRG]

 

Appudu vaallu modalupettina paddithine ga prabhutvam tarapuna nunchi aah Cheera, Mutyalu laanti kaanukalu ichedi..Govt pratyekinchi modalupettindi kaadu ga.

[Raasko]

15 minutes ago, jalamkamandalam said:

Yes, Rebellion was much stronger than that projected by Congressi written History. At one point in time, Humayun was ousted from Delhi and he had to take refuge. Aurangazeb, as we know, was the real re-incarnation of Mohammad. The Communit-Congressi written Indian History painted a glory picture of Moghul Rule - that all Indians were happy and surrendered to their tolerant rule and because of that 20% of its population have been converted to Islam, by their own willing.

Yes, sometimes political, sometimes tactical, sometimes carrot & Stick approach and finally violence at the end.

Kaani paamulu pattevaadu paamu kaatuke chasthaadu annattu aiindhi Moghul/Islamic rule in India.

They were wiped out by the same violence.

 

ee comedy eppudoo vinaledey ? Janallo rebellion unity ledu..... antha popular figures Akkanna Maadanna ni beheading chestey koodaa em ayindi? Ookey gudi kattaaru

[Raasko]

23 minutes ago, Paidithalli said:

Sri vaishnavulaki mon day roju . Kala mathram ayina navAmi sheshinchukunnanu kevalam dasami nandu Vaishnava sampradayam lo kalayam chestharu. Andhuke shaiva kshethrallo adivaram , vaishnava kshethrallo somavaram sri Rama navami

mallee ee confusion endi baa? Ippudu Ontimitta Saiva khestram ettaa ? how? 

[jalamkamandalam]

1 hour ago, Raasko said:

ee comedy eppudoo vinaledey ? Janallo rebellion unity ledu..... antha popular figures Akkanna Maadanna ni beheading chestey koodaa em ayindi? Ookey gudi kattaaru

Aurangazeb killed the Sikh Guru.

Aurangazeb destroyed the re-built Somnath Temple.

Aurangazeb destroyed thousands of Temples across North India, leaving Kasi Viswanath, as he could not demolish the whole City during his life -time.

Thats the reason why Northies do not have any significant historical temples and traditions as many a you find in every part of South India.

[Raasko]

20 minutes ago, jalamkamandalam said:

Aurangazeb killed the Sikh Guru.

Aurangazeb destroyed the re-built Somnath Temple.

Aurangazeb destroyed thousands of Temples across North India, leaving Kasi Viswanath, as he could not demolish the whole City during his life -time.

Thats the reason why Northies do not have any significant historical temples and traditions as many a you find in every part of South India.

More than temples i think the destruction  of knowledge which was far worse.  Great universities Nalanda and Takshshila. 

Khilji decided to destroy the roots of knowledge, Buddhism and Ayurveda, from the country. He set fire to the great library of Nalanda and burned down nearly 9 million manuscripts.

The library was so vast and strong that it took three months to completely destroy it. The Turkish invaders also murdered monks and scholars in the university.