Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, boeing747 said:

aunu chala manchodu fafam..elli Guj lo janalni adugu septaru eedi 56 inch bra bagotham

@3$%

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Paidithalli

    16

  • Android_Halwa

    10

  • Soul

    8

  • uttermost

    6

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

currency ni oka 10% devalue cheyu bhai, sensex growth chudu, gurram lekka urkutadi..FII and FDI's inflow oka range la rechipotadi and sensex okate urkutadi...

but such a scenario cannot be an index to measure govt's performance...

Posted
6 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said:

Growth of sensex cannot be a index for performance of government.

Look at human development index, infant morality rate, poverty index, interest rates, growth in GDP and per-capita, inflation rate etc can be considered as bench mark of government's performance...

definetely not sensex growth..! 

You are talking about economic growth. It's a completely different topic. If we are talking about growth we have to consider all of things you mentioned 

He is talking about investor sentiment and sensex performance

Posted
11 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said:

Growth of sensex cannot be a index for performance of government.

Look at human development index, infant morality rate, poverty index, interest rates, growth in GDP and per-capita, inflation rate etc can be considered as bench mark of government's performance...

definetely not sensex growth..! 

avanni choosthey, Vajpayee govt meedha ummuthaaru brother.

UPA is the best govt especially by that criteria you bring up. Nehru's may be the worst.

Posted

In all ways, every way, UPA >>>>>>>>>>> Modi govt. Most modi supporters were ones who benefited from UPA, but were too bothered that muslims are coming up, so they decided to put the brakes on economy for a while to enjoy their new found wealth. :) 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said:

Growth of sensex cannot be a index for performance of government.

Look at human development index, infant morality rate, poverty index, interest rates, growth in GDP and per-capita, inflation rate etc can be considered as bench mark of government's performance...

definetely not sensex growth..! 

bro where are you growth ante  

how much did ambani  and adani make 

@Android_Halwa   how are is their net value   inka ekkad unnav anna pata kalam lekkalu vestu  we are a capitalist economy    my 2cents 

Posted
5 minutes ago, uttermost said:

but were too bothered that muslims are coming up

actually this isnt a big deal at that time.

religious conversions were at an all time high, corruptions/scams out of proportions in congress ruled states, people getting vexed with news on weak defence/security issues (bombings happening etc) and AP lo 0 to congress due to u know why are some of the key factors

Posted
5 minutes ago, kevinUsa said:

bro where are you growth ante  

how much did ambani  and adani make 

@Android_Halwa   how are is their net value   inka ekkad unnav anna pata kalam lekkalu vestu  we are a capitalist economy    my 2cents 

halwa db jeevitham eppudo oka saari manchi post esthadu, daanni kooda chedagottey laa unnav ga.

capitalist economy is bullshit. measuring anything through that is just smokescreening to hide worse living conditions for the people.

thankfully UPA did well on human development indices. Way better than any govt ever before it, and after it. It is still not enough for a country like India, but technically its better than the rest.

Posted
8 minutes ago, uttermost said:

avanni choosthey, Vajpayee govt meedha ummuthaaru brother.

UPA is the best govt especially by that criteria you bring up. Nehru's may be the worst.

I personally rank UPA-1 as the best..! massive changes and visible changes, kastha policy paralysis vunde kani overall it was good government. preceeding vajpayee's govt, infra movement was good and domestic demand kuda baaga vunde...

UPA-2, started off on a good note, but by 2010, lost its steam man. 

and I never said Vajpayee's govt ranked better...I would not even consider it as a govt..it was paralysed govt coming of  a  dark age.

Posted
Just now, boeing747 said:

actually this isnt a big deal at that time.

religious conversions were at an all time high, corruptions/scams out of proportions in congress ruled states, people getting vexed with news on weak defence/security issues (bombings happening etc) and AP lo 0 to congress due to u know why are some of the key factors

each had their reasons. But anti muslim bigotry was not a small portion of votes for BJP.

Posted
1 hour ago, manadonga said:

Modi emi wars chesadani econamy grow avatam ledu

modi prajala meeda chestundu War...@3$% (just joke bhaktulu personal ga teesukuni savakandi)

Posted
20 minutes ago, Soul said:

You are talking about economic growth. It's a completely different topic. If we are talking about growth we have to consider all of things you mentioned 

He is talking about investor sentiment and sensex performance

Brother, Look at TS heading.

The issues and parameters which I spoke, are the actual indices of govt performance. 

to see the performance, look at HDI...not sensex or investor confidence...you are talking about finance and we are discussing about govt's performance and both are not same..

Posted

GDP growth and Per capita income are parameters for economic growth. 

Human Development Index is usually considered for performance of the govt

Posted
9 minutes ago, uttermost said:

halwa db jeevitham eppudo oka saari manchi post esthadu, daanni kooda chedagottey laa unnav ga.

capitalist economy is bullshit. measuring anything through that is just smokescreening to hide worse living conditions for the people.

thankfully UPA did well on human development indices. Way better than any govt ever before it, and after it. It is still not enough for a country like India, but technically its better than the rest.

Ofcourse man, UPA-1 was a good government atleast from welfare point of view. UPA-2 was mirred with controversies but it could partly deliver and most importantly could run the government successfully till the term. 

Wish we could have a repeat of UPA-1 in 2019. Time is good and global growth is good...Modi won;t be able to do much justice for sure.

Posted
1 minute ago, Android_Halwa said:

Ofcourse man, UPA-1 was a good government atleast from welfare point of view. UPA-2 was mirred with controversies but it could partly deliver and most importantly could run the government successfully till the term. 

Wish we could have a repeat of UPA-1 in 2019. Time is good and global growth is good...Modi won;t be able to do much justice for sure.

Antha unpudddd gallu unnaru modi gadi cabinet lo

 

In the case of UPA 1 they had some extremely educated cabinet ministers 

Manmohan singh - Oxford

Chidambaram - Harvard

Kapil sibal - Harvard

Jai ram Ramesh - Harvard or MIT

Mani shanker Iyer - Cambridge 

Maran - Some course at Harvard too

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...