Good News: Sabarimala Temple Open To Women Of All Ages, Says Supreme Court: 10 Facts

[Android_Halwa]

7 minutes ago, Nellore Pedda reddy said:

What is the basis for these so called “rituals”?

Historical claims...centuries-old traditions...much before the law was even born...

rituals based on beliefs..

temple may not be the place to enforce law.

[Nellore Pedda reddy]

2 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said:

Historical claims...centuries-old traditions...much before the law was even born...

rituals based on beliefs..

temple may not be the place to enforce law.

Again, how can you be so sure of “centuries-old traditions” and “rituals based on beliefs”?

[MiryalgudaMaruthi]

10 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said:

Historical claims...centuries-old traditions...much before the law was even born...

rituals based on beliefs..

temple may not be the place to enforce law.

Friday bii nee godava endi anna

[soodhilodaaram]

40 minutes ago, Nellore Pedda reddy said:

What is the basis for these so called “rituals”?

converted gaa.. nuvvu musuko..the questions you are asking are just your stupidity

rituals ki basis endi raa, the people who do these believe in something, isn't that their right to follow what they want

converted or confused gaadi laa unnavu.. inka overaction chaalu

[soodhilodaaram]

21 minutes ago, MiryalgudaMaruthi said:

Friday bii nee godava endi anna

nuvvu usko unkul

[soodhilodaaram]

50 minutes ago, Nellore Pedda reddy said:

Again, how can you be so sure of “centuries-old traditions” and “rituals based on beliefs”?

if it is lasting even today, doesn't that mean its a tradition

well if you are not believer, what gives you right to question, go and fcuk within your religion first

[Android_Halwa]

37 minutes ago, Nellore Pedda reddy said:

Again, how can you be so sure of “centuries-old traditions” and “rituals based on beliefs”?

Again, history from a legal point of view is based on limited recorded facts which modern law relies on...

But what is the proof that such recorded history is projected in the right way?

last 75 years itself is biased and history is altered and taught to the next generation, How can the court rely on such doctored facts?

Too many laws...and too much of it gets complicated and conflicted, Sabarimalai is a good example of judgement on distorted facts.

[soodhilodaaram]

9 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said:

Again, history from a legal point of view is based on limited recorded facts which modern law relies on...

But what is the proof that such recorded history is projected in the right way?

last 75 years itself is biased and history is altered and taught to the next generation, How can the court rely on such doctored facts?

Too many laws...and too much of it gets complicated and conflicted, Sabarimalai is a good example of judgement on distorted facts.

supporting facts were not considered at all, there was enough material submitted to court, the judge appears to have disregarded

Judge Indu was the only sane voice saying that unless a practice is evil such as sati, rest should be left to religion itself

[kingcasanova]

7 hours ago, Veeraveera said:

Sanjeyadu ane oka ayana vinnadu. He got that power on request solely to convey the story yo drithrastra 

Bhaaratham motham vyasudiki telusu, don't know exact story behind it, but it is written by Lord vinayaka as Vyasa maharshi was narrating it, I don't know how Vyasa got the power to foresee or recollect the Mahabharata story. 

More over most of the Gita verses are from Vedas.

[Android_Halwa]

51 minutes ago, soodhilodaaram said:

supporting facts were not considered at all, there was enough material submitted to court, the judge appears to have disregarded

Judge Indu was the only sane voice saying that unless a practice is evil such as sati, rest should be left to religion itself

Distortion of facts...judgement based on impartial evidence...

idantha gender equality kosam anta ...

silly and stupid

[sriraamchandra]

3 hours ago, soodhilodaaram said:

PIL was filed by Naushad Khan, what the fcuk this guy has to do with Hinduism.. its self explanatory that NGO's will file cases and SC will interfere in Hindu religion, this is suppose to be Hindu Majority government and Minorities are under threat 

Judges in SC are the biggest crooks that india will repent in future, god knows what law ministry and government are doing when SC is litellay running every show

loook at the judgements in the last month,  gay sex is not crime, Adultery is not crime,.. more to come

The observation came when Naushad Ahmed Khan, President of Indian Young Lawyers' Association (IYLA) which has filed the PIL on Sabarimala issue, sought urgent hearing of the matter saying he has received 500 threatening phone calls in recent times and asked to take back the PIL.... we are suppose to believe that he was doing this for love towards majority religion women leaving their own religion women under medieval religious Triple Talaaq

if there was indeed a case, it was suppose to be a PIL by Hindu women right??

Well, the majority of the Hindus don't voice out when such things happen..instead, keep on blabbering the feel-good phrases about their tolerance. Simply incompetent. There is an existential threat, and the people who are at threat don't even care. We never learnt from our history. 

[Nellore Pedda reddy]

9 hours ago, Android_Halwa said:

Again, history from a legal point of view is based on limited recorded facts which modern law relies on...

But what is the proof that such recorded history is projected in the right way?

last 75 years itself is biased and history is altered and taught to the next generation, How can the court rely on such doctored facts?

Too many laws...and too much of it gets complicated and conflicted, Sabarimalai is a good example of judgement on distorted facts.

GP

[WHAT]

kerala women: అయ్యో మాకెందుకండీ ఈ సమానత్వాలు గట్రా మా మానాన మేం బానిసల్లెక్క పడుంటే భలే పోరాటాలు సేహేత్తారాండి మీరు. మేమేదో కష్టపడి వెనక్కి ఎట్టపోవాలా అని ఆలోచిస్తుంటే మీరేంటండీ ముందుకు పొమ్మంటరు.

 

[WHAT]

^ aina evaru mimmalni force chesaru temple ki vellamani

[solman]

supreme court judge nolto Hyd MP gadi motta