Brady vs Rodgers

[InSearch]

7 minutes ago, jajjanaka_jandri said:

rodgers> brady.  Rodgers valla packs ki peru, but thats not the case with brady. Pats valla brady ki peru

As an individual football player yes.

As a winning QB, NO.

BB failed as a HC until Brady came under center.

What they did together is close out games like no other pair have ever done. 

Packers built their offense around Rodgers. 

---------------------------------------

Robin utappa out of the crease mundukochi six kottinantha maatrana, Sachin kante great cricketer kaaledu.. Russell Wilson Brady kaaledu

A similar comparison would be.. If Brady is Sachin and Rodgers will be like Virat Kohli..

 

[chittimallu2]

14 minutes ago, SeemaLekka said:

evaru ekkada aa half the player

Ronaldo is not half the player Messi is but press wants someone to compare with Messi and keep the fire burning.

13 minutes ago, panipoori said:

Explain.. i think messi is pure talent and ronaldo is more hardworking

I dont want to get into that debate... if you watch enough footy you will know.

[panipoori]

17 minutes ago, chittimallu2 said:

Ronaldo is not half the player Messi is but press wants someone to compare with Messi and keep the fire burning.

I dont want to get into that debate... if you watch enough footy you will know.

not prolonging the debate but messi has stuck to only La liga.....Ronaldo gaadu seri A lo kuda aadtunnadu

[chittimallu2]

4 minutes ago, panipoori said:

not prolonging the debate but messi has stuck to only La liga.....Ronaldo gaadu seri A lo kuda aadtunnadu

and that proves what? Does that make him a better passer of the ball? Does that make him better dribbler of the ball? Does that make him better controller of the tempo of the game by dropping to the midfield? Does that make him unlock the defenses by playing as number 10 when needed? Does that make him play as a false 9 to help the team if needed? Does that make him rack up assists on par with the world's best attacking mids? Does that make him a better ball winner in the final third? 

Look, Ronaldo is only comparable to Messi in one aspect and that is in the number of goals scored.... in no other aspect he even has a sniff at Messi. All the attributes I mentioned above belongs to one man and one man alone in the entire footballing world, there is no player that even is in the same league as him, not even close.

End of

[panipoori]

8 minutes ago, chittimallu2 said:

and that proves what? Does that make him a better passer of the ball? Does that make him better dribbler of the ball? Does that make him better controller of the tempo of the game by dropping to the midfield? Does that make him unlock the defenses by playing as number 10 when needed? Does that make him play as a false 9 to help the team if needed? Does that make him rack up assists on par with the world's best attacking mids? Does that make him a better ball winner in the final third? 

Look, Ronaldo is only comparable to Messi in one aspect and that is in the number of goals scored.... in no other aspect he even has a sniff at Messi. All the attributes I mentioned above belongs to one man and one man alone in the entire footballing world, there is no player that even is in the same league as him, not even close.

End of

Chill bro

I like messi too.. Was just trying to get your reason of completely avoiding Ronaldo stature beside messi.. both have been equally nominated to ballon dor's.

[chittimallu2]

6 minutes ago, panipoori said:

Chill bro

I like messi too.. Was just trying to get your reason of completely avoiding Ronaldo stature beside messi.. both have been equally nominated to ballon dor's.

im not avoiding Ronaldo or not calling him a bad player. He is one of the greatest players and easily in top 10 plyaers of this generation. All I said was he is being compared to Messi just because he scores as much as Leo but he doesnt match him in any other aspect. 

Ballon d'ors are a different argument, its not given for the best player but are given to the top rated player from the team that won a tournament. It's all media and marketing circus. You need to look way beyond that and for starters, watch about 6-10 matches per week to get an idea about this sport.

Anyways footy is team sport and individual awards are nonsense imo, they are there just for the marketing and media circus anthe. It means nothing to me.

My fav player isnt even Messi (Since you said Chill, I like Messi too) and he is not the first player I look for on the pitch. I'm stating the fact anthe

[panipoori]

2 minutes ago, chittimallu2 said:

im not avoiding Ronaldo or not calling him a bad player. He is one of the greatest players and easily in top 10 plyaers of this generation. All I said was he is being compared to Messi just because he scores as much as Leo but he doesnt match him in any other aspect. 

Ballon d'ors are a different argument, its not given for the best player but are given to the top rated player from the team that won a tournament. It's all media and marketing circus. You need to look way beyond that and for starters, watch about 6-10 matches per week to get an idea about this sport.

Anyways footy is team sport and individual awards are nonsense imo, they are there just for the marketing and media circus anthe. It means nothing to me.

My fav player isnt even Messi (Since you said Chill, I like Messi too) and he is not the first player I look for on the pitch. I'm stating the fact anthe

Okay imo I think two forward players ni stats tho ne compare chestunaaru. Forward players facing each other in the field would be very rare . And La liga lo I used to watch only El classico's and some times when Athlectico was playing with either of these teams.

[chittimallu2]

1 minute ago, panipoori said:

Okay imo I think two forward players ni stats tho ne compare chestunaaru. Forward players facing each other in the field would be very rare . And La liga lo I used to watch only El classico's and some times when Athlectico was playing with either of these teams.

That bold statement is actually wrong and also I know what kind of a viewer you are, a casual one, I kind of assumed it based on your debate already and I can explain and teach you more about this rivalry and footy in general  if you are interested but ikkada vaddhu... let the handegg boys have their thread.

[panipoori]

1 minute ago, chittimallu2 said:

That bold statement is actually wrong and also I know what kind of a viewer you are, a casual one, I kind of assumed it based on your debate already and I can explain and teach you more about this rivalry and footy in general  if you are interested but ikkada vaddhu... let the handegg boys have their thread.

Sure Thanks !! Yup I more of a casual viewer and watch selective PL and champions league matches

[chittimallu2]

6 minutes ago, panipoori said:

Sure Thanks !! Yup I more of a casual viewer and watch selective PL and champions league matches

Yes adi ardham aindi... anduke i gave a statement that you need to watch about 6-10 games a week atleast to form a proper opinion... year ki two clasicos choosthe theliyadu...im not saying thats a wrong thing though as everyone wont have the interest or time to watch so many but unfortunately thats how you learn, by spending time and having interest

epudaina calling thread eyyi we can discuss

[jajjanaka_jandri]

1 hour ago, InSearch said:

As an individual football player yes.

As a winning QB, NO.

BB failed as a HC until Brady came under center.

What they did together is close out games like no other pair have ever done. 

Packers built their offense around Rodgers. 

---------------------------------------

Robin utappa out of the crease mundukochi six kottinantha maatrana, Sachin kante great cricketer kaaledu.. Russell Wilson Brady kaaledu

A similar comparison would be.. If Brady is Sachin and Rodgers will be like Virat Kohli..

 

10

am comparing as an individual player.

I dont agree to the highlighted part 

 

[InSearch]

On 11/2/2018 at 4:52 PM, jajjanaka_jandri said:

am comparing as an individual player.

I dont agree to the highlighted part 

 

enduku brother.. ninna kooda same thing kada..

Brady won the game with out a real running back and GRONK.

Rodgers cannot stop fumbles, Rodgers cannot play defense. He may be a super star but he is playing for a crazily stupid team.

Where as Brady can keep his end of bargain most of the times and make the offense score enough points to win the game and possess the ball enough to close out games.

[TensionNahiLeneka]

#MODALERT

[Naaperushiva]

11 minutes ago, InSearch said:

enduku brother.. ninna kooda same thing kada..

Brady won the game with out a real running back and GRONK.

Rodgers cannot stop fumbles, Rodgers cannot play defense. He may be a super star but he is playing for a crazily stupid team.

Where as Brady can keep his end of bargain most of the times and make the offense score enough points to win the game and possess the ball enough to close out games.

Yes this is very true....Brady's team is the most disciplined in all the aspects of the game. be it offense defense or the special teams...Their schemes and trick plays can easily fool the opposing teams

Brady and the BB are a deadly combo

Brady always has this luxury of trusting their def to make up a play for him when it matters which Arod doesn't have

But for Arod nope his coaching staff is a mess.. So he has to be perfect with his game if at all he plays avg then we all know what the result would be...

So lets cut this crap of comparing two great qb;s in a team game

 

[InSearch]

3 minutes ago, Naaperushiva said:

Yes this is very true....Brady's team is the most disciplined in all the aspects of the game. be it offense defense or the special teams...Their schemes and trick plays can easily fool the opposing teams

Brady and the BB are a deadly combo

Brady always has this luxury of trusting their def to make up a play for him when it matters which Arod doesn't have

But for Arod nope his coaching staff is a mess.. So he has to be perfect with his game if at all he plays avg then we all know what the result would be...

So lets cut this crap of comparing two great qb;s in a team game

 

agreed.. closing note..

when you rely on the legs of your QB and it is most likely your QB will be injured often and miss game and that affects the team's season..

as Chris Collinsworth said: 

Brady has the ability to beat the defense before the ball is snapped.. 

Rodgers is great after the ball is snapped.. 

Two different qualities and each of those are equally great..