Okka question on ram mandir

[Android_Halwa]

13 minutes ago, reality said:

Ok. March 2019 deadline aa?

Supreme Court has set march 2019 as final deadline for the case and judgement has to be reserved by then...

Lets see...Indian judiciary is very bad at maintaining timelines..

[kingcasanova]

On 11/27/2018 at 11:30 PM, jefferson1 said:

E thread is to just find out why anthe, not to criticize 

 

bjp Govt enduku ram mandir kattatam ledu, what is the actual reason

 

please podt proofs for discussion 

itukalu rate ekkuva, thagge daaka aagudhaam ani Modi whatsapped shah

[chittimallu2]

ee case lo thurakollu enduku antha stubborn unnaru.... why dont they let hindus build the temple there? That land doesnt belong to their prophet and he is not from our country.... while hindus believe thats the birth place of their God Ram, why cant muslim heads be nice and let hindus have that place? Clearly muslims can build a masjid elsewhere if they want as it really doesnt matter to them where it is..... Isnt this clear case of egoistic behaviour by them?  Not having a dig at them but just trying to get an answer from any muslims or pseudo seculars in this DB.... lets see what you got.... 

chip in  @uttermost

[Samputha]

On 11/27/2018 at 6:14 PM, solman said:

Beef batch temple eppatiki kattaru 

ne turka batch eppatiki oppukodhu ga.. 

[Samputha]

On 11/27/2018 at 6:46 PM, Android_Halwa said:

chala updated vunnav...

chala nyayamaina doubts vastunayi...school lo class topper kada...?

cha... doubt adagadam la thappu ledhu... telisthey cheppu ,oo thurum khan lekka feel aythunau 

[batman2]

On 11/27/2018 at 11:46 PM, jefferson1 said:

Vere land lo enduku kattodu ?

why hang on to the same land, Govt daggara free land untundi kada 

neeku ram temple agitation basics kuda idea ledhu anukunta

not your fault, many ppl in this db are like that. they dont have much knowledge abt history legacy and just jump in becoz of this social media they too have opinions and vent out here. its not a crime though

whole agitation is "mandir wahi banayenge"  babar LK destroyed a ram temple centuries ago and built babri mosque. temples have a sanctity and the hindu belief is that place is ram janmbhoomi. so temple should come up there

[uttermost]

9 hours ago, chittimallu2 said:

ee case lo thurakollu enduku antha stubborn unnaru.... why dont they let hindus build the temple there? That land doesnt belong to their prophet and he is not from our country.... while hindus believe thats the birth place of their God Ram, why cant muslim heads be nice and let hindus have that place? Clearly muslims can build a masjid elsewhere if they want as it really doesnt matter to them where it is..... Isnt this clear case of egoistic behaviour by them?  Not having a dig at them but just trying to get an answer from any muslims or pseudo seculars in this DB.... lets see what you got.... 

 chip in  @uttermost

They don't trust RSS like organizations, who'''ll use this precedent to claim other sites. Nothing more.

clearly a truce is possible, but only if both sides can meet midway. 

[chittimallu2]

10 minutes ago, uttermost said:

They don't trust RSS like organizations, who'''ll use this precedent to claim other sites. Nothing more.

clearly a truce is possible, but only if both sides can meet midway. 

Forget RSS.... I have seen once a video on YouTube where a muslim head speaks to a crowd and he does approve of Sree Ramudi gudi in Ayodhya.... he said very similar to what I said above... sad his voice wasn't propagatrd enough.... I wish majority muslims are like that in this case.... 

[Biskot2]

@uttermost achindu inka andharu pakkaki jaragandi..

[chittimallu2]

2 minutes ago, Biskot2 said:

@uttermost achindu inka andharu pakkaki jaragandi..

athanni pilichindhe nenu... nuvve pakkaki jarugu

[uttermost]

2 minutes ago, chittimallu2 said:

Forget RSS.... I have seen once a video on YouTube where a muslim head speaks to a crowd and he does approve of Sree Ramudi gudi in Ayodhya.... he said very similar to what I said above... sad his voice wasn't propagatrd enough.... I wish majority muslims are like that in this case.... 

yes. lots of people in Ayodhya want this issue to be resolved.

Why should I forget RSS? Will you defend muslims from hate speech from regular people if they allow for mandir to be built? Its not practical.

so they are forced to fight. Its a fight for their political relevance. but its a futile fight. sad.

[chittimallu2]

1 minute ago, uttermost said:

yes. lots of people in Ayodhya want this issue to be resolved.

Why should I forget RSS? Will you defend muslims from hate speech from regular people if they allow for mandir to be built? Its not practical.

so they are forced to fight. Its a fight for their political relevance. but its a futile fight. sad.

Ofcourse I will and I did many times... I dont paint every muslim with a single stroke... im not an idiot to do that...

[uttermost]

1 minute ago, chittimallu2 said:

Ofcourse I will and I did many times... I dont paint every muslim with a single stroke... im not an idiot to do that...

Lets hope there will come a time when mandir will be built in Ayodhya, and muslims will help build it, and it will help pave the road for reconciliation between both hindus and muslims.

at the moment, I'm not that hopeful of that happening.

[batman2]

37 minutes ago, uttermost said:

They don't trust RSS like organizations, who'''ll use this precedent to claim other sites. Nothing more.

clearly a truce is possible, but only if both sides can meet midway. 

there you go.......you do agree that muzlim invaders have destroyed several temples and built mosques in its place/sites

[batman2]

29 minutes ago, chittimallu2 said:

Ofcourse I will and I did many times... I dont paint every muslim with a single stroke... im not an idiot to do that...

no muzlims as whole cannot be painted more so as they were thoroughly brainwashed to follow a virus cult

but the religion they folow can only be painted/drawn/written with a single brush only and it will take only a maha-idiot not to realise that