Polavaram n AP benifits

[snoww]

7 minutes ago, futureofandhra said:

Abba musugu tolagindhi 

Kasta cbn em gelikado cheptara mastaru

So that it will be interesting n fun

Hyderabad: Getting serious over Andhra Pradesh government’s complaint against the Kaleshwaram project to the Union Ministry of Water Resources, the Telangana government has decided to counter its neighbour’s arguments strongly on the construction of the irrigation project.  Though the complaint will not impact the project works as it got all necessary permissions from the Centre, highly-placed sources said TS Irrigation Minister T Harish Rao instructed the irrigation officials to study the objections raised by the Andhra government to counter the same at the Centre.  

 

The TS government took strong exception to the AP government’s stand on Kaleshwaram project without any valid reasons. State Irrigation officials said the AP objection on the utilization of river Godavari waters for Kaleshwaram project was unwarranted.  Telangana is utilizing 954 TMC of water allocated to the state.  There is no need of seeking any fresh permission from either the Union ministry or the Godavari River Management Board (GRMB) on the use of water under the project.  

 

 

 

The Union government accorded all permissions to the project, including TAC (Technical Advisory Committee) of the Ministry of Water Resources, CWC (Central Water Commission) and also the forest and environmental clearances. At this stage, AP approached the Centre against the project challenging it only for political mileage, officials said. 

 

 

 

The TS government will also counter the objections on the project DPR (Detailed Project Report). The project was redesigned for optimum utilization of water allocated to Telangana, they said.  Officials said the TS government will submit a report to the Centre soon after receiving the complaint copy and counter the AP arguments effectively. 

[futureofandhra]

1 minute ago, snoww said:

Hyderabad: Getting serious over Andhra Pradesh government’s complaint against the Kaleshwaram project to the Union Ministry of Water Resources, the Telangana government has decided to counter its neighbour’s arguments strongly on the construction of the irrigation project.  Though the complaint will not impact the project works as it got all necessary permissions from the Centre, highly-placed sources said TS Irrigation Minister T Harish Rao instructed the irrigation officials to study the objections raised by the Andhra government to counter the same at the Centre.  

 

The TS government took strong exception to the AP government’s stand on Kaleshwaram project without any valid reasons. State Irrigation officials said the AP objection on the utilization of river Godavari waters for Kaleshwaram project was unwarranted.  Telangana is utilizing 954 TMC of water allocated to the state.  There is no need of seeking any fresh permission from either the Union ministry or the Godavari River Management Board (GRMB) on the use of water under the project.  

 

 

 

The Union government accorded all permissions to the project, including TAC (Technical Advisory Committee) of the Ministry of Water Resources, CWC (Central Water Commission) and also the forest and environmental clearances. At this stage, AP approached the Centre against the project challenging it only for political mileage, officials said. 

 

 

 

The TS government will also counter the objections on the project DPR (Detailed Project Report). The project was redesigned for optimum utilization of water allocated to Telangana, they said.  Officials said the TS government will submit a report to the Centre soon after receiving the complaint copy and counter the AP arguments effectively. 

What is AP argument

I didn't understand

[snoww]

1 minute ago, futureofandhra said:

What is AP argument

I didn't understand

AP wants the center to restudy the permissions given to Kaaleshwaram saying Design was changed from YSR government plan. 

Orissa has the same argument against Polavaram. 

[Juggernautt]

6 minutes ago, futureofandhra said:

What is AP argument

I didn't understand

teri makki choos

[futureofandhra]

1 minute ago, snoww said:

AP wants the center to restudy the permissions given to Kaaleshwaram saying Design was changed from YSR government plan. 

Orissa has the same argument against Polavaram. 

Polavaram Orissa Dora statement was there before bifurcation

It is not something new 

Since I don't have knowledge on this kaleswaram project I will not comment

[futureofandhra]

6 minutes ago, Juggernautt said:

teri makki choos

@MOD23

Why people like these are in DB 

@TOM_BHAYYA. Anna Chala edhigi poyaru mental fans

 

[snoww]

12 minutes ago, futureofandhra said:

Polavaram Orissa Dora statement was there before bifurcation

It is not something new 

Since I don't have knowledge on this kaleswaram project I will not comment

Not your fault. Because Yellow media doesn't publishes such news.

Start reading news from non yellow media sources too. Then you will be familiar with both the sides.

[snoww]

15 minutes ago, futureofandhra said:

Polavaram Orissa Dora statement was there before bifurcation

It is not something new 

Since I don't have knowledge on this kaleswaram project I will not comment

So are you saying there was no design change ?

Dispute with Odisha and Telangana[edit]

In July 2018, a two member bench of the Supreme Court asked Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Odisha and Chhattisgarh governments to frame the issues for arguments. Telangana said to the court it is in-principle agree for project but centre should takeup study by Neutral central institute like CWPRS, Pune to study impact of Backwater due to increase of 36 Lakh cusecs to 50 Lakh cusecs of design discharge, it is to ascertain Safety of important temple town like Bhadrachalam, Mining areas and heavy water Plant.Orissa also insisting for Backwater studies.

[Juggernautt]

6 minutes ago, snoww said:

Not your fault. Because Yellow media doesn't publishes such news.

Start reading news from non yellow media sources too. Then you will be familiar with both the sides.

@futureofandhra lunch udaka...start reading news from all sources, don’t blame PK for your birth.

[futureofandhra]

1 minute ago, Juggernautt said:

@futureofandhra lunch udaka...start reading news from all sources, don’t blame PK for your birth.

The way you are spitting venom makes me pity of how you are raised by your family

May God bless you

[futureofandhra]

10 minutes ago, snoww said:

Not your fault. Because Yellow media doesn't publishes such news.

Start reading news from non yellow media sources too. Then you will be familiar with both the sides.

I hardly follow yellow media

Any ways i will try to find info

[perugu_vada]

1 hour ago, futureofandhra said:

Vuncle cbn did commendable job in terms of development

Kakapothey pappuli bellalu panchipettali 

He is lagging some how in that aspect

Meeku capital antey oka 4 buildings laga vuntayi

It's rare opportunity to build n earn through tourism

Any ways long term thinking adhi

 

Aunu chala development aindi, go ask common man about sand mafia, bogus ppt’s, actual development

nenu india ocha 2 weeks back, ground reality is different to wat u are talking or thinking about

smart city annaru kkd lo, 3 ac bus-stops pettaru, god knows y they need ac  inka free wifi anta, cant really understand the need

ila chepthuu unte chalane unnay, entha wastage o by the name of development

[TOM_BHAYYA]

1 hour ago, futureofandhra said:

Abba musugu tolagindhi 

Kasta cbn em gelikado cheptara mastaru

So that it will be interesting n fun

Inthaki mukkodu em gelikado.. official source please 

[snoww]

2 minutes ago, TOM_BHAYYA said:

Inthaki mukkodu em gelikado.. official source please 

He raised objections to design changes to Polavaram

[sattipandu]

5 minutes ago, TOM_BHAYYA said:

Inthaki mukkodu em gelikado.. official source please 

bodi ki chaadilu cheppi SS raakunda thondi chesaaadu