Rahul Dravid opens up on Hardik Pandya, KL Rahul criticism; urges people not to 'overreact'

[uttermost]

Just now, reality said:

Agreed, a bad cue from RD, indirectly supporting these assholes. 

I agree with RD too.. sacking is fine, but public humiliation koncham over ayyindi hardik ki.

edho migatha vaallandaru uthhamulu aynattu. he'll learn not to talk nonsense in public.

private lo vaadu em cheskuntey enti.. entha mandi ni 10githey endhi. nobody cares.

[reality]

2 minutes ago, uttermost said:

I agree with RD too.. sacking is fine, but public humiliation koncham over ayyindi hardik ki.

edho migatha vaallandaru uthhamulu aynattu. he'll learn not to talk nonsense in public.

private lo vaadu em cheskuntey enti.. entha mandi ni 10githey endhi. nobody cares.

I don’t. Leave them alone enti? IPL thone sankanaki poyaru ee edhavalu ante, ilanti vishyallo venakeskosthe how? 

[kingcasanova]

9 minutes ago, uttermost said:

old losers making less money?? haha.. who do you benefits from contracts offered by BCCI?

 

orey pichi puvvaa, bokkalo contracts tho CoA lo pani chese vaallaku bochu kooda raadhu, kaavaalante nuvvochi naadi peeekkoni velli vaallakivvu. players kochina daantlo 10 percent kooda raadu ra my son

[kingcasanova]

13 minutes ago, uttermost said:

liberty gurinchi cheppa ra babu. prathi sentence ni parse chesi, erri p gaadi laaga questions adagaku. chethha nayala.

vaadu notiki ochinattu maatladey liberty ledhu. evadiki ledhu. young fellow. telusukuntaadu le.

 

defend chesukone dammuleka pothe musukoni pakkakelli silent ga kuso, nee post lo raase bokka lu choopinchagaane chavata sannaasi laagaa vanikipothunnaav, endiro pasa thaggindi eee madhya

[chittimallu2]

1 hour ago, uttermost said:

Its obvious people overreacted.

but that's not the deal here. They are contracted players, and are part of bcci's brand.

 Its the bcci brand that took a hit, and they reacted to it. 

The least they should know what they did was a serious breach of contract.

I dont know... does their contract with BCCI prohibits them from giving interviews? 

[Ram30]

dongalu padda 6 months ki morigi dont over react entra maidapindi

[reality]

3 hours ago, Ram30 said:

dongalu padda 6 months ki morigi dont over react entra maidapindi

Heheh... 

[uttermost]

6 hours ago, kingcasanova said:

orey pichi puvvaa, bokkalo contracts tho CoA lo pani chese vaallaku bochu kooda raadhu, kaavaalante nuvvochi naadi peeekkoni velli vaallakivvu. players kochina daantlo 10 percent kooda raadu ra my son

sarey ra chill avvu.

niddar lo ninna, CoA ni CA ani chadivi naa responses anni type sesa ley. lyt. 

ayna nuvvu cheppey daanlo emi point ledhu. CoA gallu BCCI ni nadipisthunnaru.. sare. so what ra? to me, BCCI and CoA are the same. CoA is like the ombudsman to the BCCI who has been so far making money off the India brand, without any accountability. So what is your problem with CoA, apart from chillara thing you said about old guys making less money than blah blah..

so point leni chetthha ni nenu counter cheyyalani expect seyyaku :) antha opika illa.

[uttermost]

5 hours ago, chittimallu2 said:

I dont know... does their contract with BCCI prohibits them from giving interviews? 

pretty sure it does. BCCI may be lax at enforcing them, but sponsors won't be. 

a simple clause that a player is expected to conduct himself in accordance with the values or something blah blah as set by the team, is enough to consider this breach of contract.

I'm assuming ofcourse. that's the best anyone can do in this situation.

I would've preferred a mild rebuke, a one match ban, and counselling for the two players, instead of the extensive ban that may affect their careers.

[uttermost]

6 hours ago, kingcasanova said:

defend chesukone dammuleka pothe musukoni pakkakelli silent ga kuso, nee post lo raase bokka lu choopinchagaane chavata sannaasi laagaa vanikipothunnaav, endiro pasa thaggindi eee madhya

em defend cheyyali ra.. lol.

feminism pakkana pettu ra. vaallu cheppedhi normal indian ki acceptable antaava endhi? normal conversations lo acceptable aa.. apart from horny teenage boy groups. 

nuvvu em chepthunnavo clear ga seppu first. daani taravatha ninnu urikinchi urikinchi kodatha logic tho :) 

[chittimallu2]

Just now, uttermost said:

pretty sure it does. BCCI may be lax at enforcing them, but sponsors won't be.

never heard of it.. sports personalities give interviews all the time kada?  especially in footy

[uttermost]

7 hours ago, reality said:

I don’t. Leave them alone enti? IPL thone sankanaki poyaru ee edhavalu ante, ilanti vishyallo venakeskosthe how? 

career ending thappu em kaadhu adhi.  almost 8 ODIs, and 6 T20s ki banned ippudu.

wtf ani anaali.

[uttermost]

5 minutes ago, chittimallu2 said:

never heard of it.. sports personalities give interviews all the time kada?  especially in footy

do they give interviews with sexual connotations? did you hear what Pandya said?

he was boasting about having a boatload of women to fcuk. and how he sizes up his prey (because he's dark, and is in a darkly lit club) by observing them from afar, before he makes the move.

what does this say about the team? about the team which is worth many billions of dollars?

 

[uttermost]

10 minutes ago, chittimallu2 said:

never heard of it.. sports personalities give interviews all the time kada?  especially in footy

 

I'm not a cricket historian, so I can't remember exactly when it started, but I distinctly recall plenty of news about BCCI restricting player interviews before and during a series since the 2000s. 

I think it was in response to the match fixing scandals or something. but this is a hot button too.

[uttermost]

13 minutes ago, chittimallu2 said:

never heard of it.. sports personalities give interviews all the time kada?  especially in footy

Pandya let his team down. simple. pretty sure, plenty of his mates are not happy with him.

the ban (for a short while) is good for him and the team.

but this ban seems to go on forever and ever. paapam.