Here is Jawaharlal Nehru’s statement in reply to a question in the Lok Sabha on September 27, 1955 by Dr. J.N. Parekh on whether India had refused a seat informally offered to her in the U.N. Security Council.

[JANASENA]

From the pages of ‘The Hindu’ dated September 28, 1955.

Here is Jawaharlal Nehru’s statement in reply to a question in the Lok Sabha on September 27, 1955, by Dr. J.N. Parekh on whether India had refused a seat informally offered to her in the U.N. Security Council.

Prime Minister Nehru has categorically denied any offer, formal or informal, having been received about a seat for In dia in the UN Security Council. He made this statement in reply to a short notice question in the Lok Sabha on September 27 by Dr. J.N. Parekh whether India had refused a seat informally offered to her in the Security Council. The Prime Minister said: “There has been no offer, formal or informal, of this kind. Some vague references have appeared in the press about it which have no foundation in fact. The composition of the Security Council is prescribed by the UN Charter, according to which certainly specified nations have permanent seats. No change or addition can be made to this without an amendment of the Charter. There is, therefore, no question of a seat being offered and India declining it. Our declared policy is to support the admission of all nations qualified for UN membership.”

 

[Spartan]

inni rojulu nunchi mottukuntunte..

ippude baita pettadam lo tatparyam emi..

[Anta Assamey]

Ade kada... Mana valla tappu lekunda edi jaragadu ...  

[Quickgun_murugan]

6 minutes ago, Spartan said:

inni rojulu nunchi mottukuntunte..

ippude baita pettadam lo tatparyam emi..

Elechun season .

[Spartan]

@JANASENA

 

what about this article..

clear ga references state chesadu from Russian and US delegate words in writing...

 

https://thewire.in/diplomacy/when-nehru-refused-american-bait-on-a-permanent-seat-for-india-at-the-un

[Spartan]

[Nikolai] Bulganin: Regarding your suggestion about the four power conference we would take appropriate action. While we are discussing the general international situation and reducing tension, we propose suggesting at a later stage India’s inclusion as the sixth member of the Security Council.

JN [Jawaharlal Nehru]:  Perhaps Bulganin knows that some people in USA have suggested that India should replace China in the Security Council. This is to create trouble between us and China. We are, of course, wholly opposed to it. Further, we are opposed to pushing ourselves forward to occupy certain positions because that may itself create difficulties and India might itself become a subject to controversy. If India is to be admitted to the Security Council, it raises the question of the revision of the Charter of the UN. We feel that this should not be done till the question of China’s admission and possibly of others is first solved. I feel that we should first concentrate on getting China admitted. What is Bulganin’s opinion about the revision of the Charter? In our opinion this does not seem to be an appropriate time for it.

Bulganin: We proposed the question of India’s membership of the Security Council to get your views, but agree that this is not the time for it and it will have to wait for the right moment later on. We also agree that things should be taken one by one.

[Mitron]

10 minutes ago, Anta Assamey said:

Ade kada... Mana valla tappu lekunda edi jaragadu ...  

What tappu

[Spartan]

It claims there were two offers, one from Russia and one from US>

both times he passed it on in favor of China...

 

[Spartan]

1 minute ago, Mitron said:

What tappu

In late August 1950, Pandit wrote to her brother from Washington, DC, where she was then posted as India’s Ambassador to the United States:

One matter that is being cooked up in the State Department should be known to you. This is the unseating of China as a Permanent Member in the Security Council and of India being put in her place. I have just seen Reuter’s report of your answer to the same question. Last week I had interviews with [John Foster] Dulles and [Philip] Jessup, reports of which I have sent to Bajpai. Both brought up this question and Dulles seemed particularly anxious that a move in this direction should be started. Last night I heard from Marquis Childs, an influential columnist of Washington, that Dulles has asked him on behalf of the State Department to build up public opinion along these lines. I told him our attitude and advised him to go slow in the matter as it would not be received with any warmth in India.

Nehru’s response within the week was unequivocal:

In your letter you mention that the State Department is trying to unseat China as a Permanent Member of the Security Council and to put India in her place. So far as we are concerned, we are not going to countenance it. That would be bad from every point of view. It would be a clear affront to China and it would mean some kind of a break between us and China. I suppose the state department would not like that, but we have no intention of following that course. We shall go on pressing for China’s admission in the UN and the Security Council. I suppose that a crisis will come during the next sessions of the General Assembly of the UN on this issue. The people’s government of China is sending a full delegation there. If they fail to get in there will be trouble which might even result in the USSR and some other countries finally quitting the UN. That may please the State Department, but it would mean the end of the UN as we have known it. That would also mean a further drift towards war.

India because of many factors, is certainly entitled to a permanent seat in the security council. But we are not going in at the cost of China.

[Anta Assamey]

10 minutes ago, Mitron said:

What tappu

Rejecting the membership ... 

[snoww]

Elect Thalli congress at center and Pilla congress in state.

Then CBN chakram thippi Imran Khan , Bill Clinton , Tony Blair and Bill gates recommendation tho India lo membership thepisthadu. 

[uttermost]

UNSC seat unte em peekedhi anta India? lol.

[psycopk]

2 hours ago, Spartan said:

inni rojulu nunchi mottukuntunte..

ippude baita pettadam lo tatparyam emi..

matter one line plz

[NaChavNenuChasta]

3 minutes ago, psycopk said:

matter one line plz

ee srushtiki moola karanam CBN anta

[netflixmovies]

Deeniki karam jagan, kcr, modi...moolam ysr.