Jump to content

Uscis Maro Pidugu on clients now


Recommended Posts

Posted
59 minutes ago, ekunadam_enkanna said:

How does UCCIS or FPU of Dept of State know about peku letters.  Usually, they call the general counsel of the end clients to check the veracity of the client letters. See the indictment of Katam Anjaneyulu and Mahalaxmi Cheruvu to see how USCIS/State dept FPU operate.  

Valla general Counsel number USCIS ki ela dorukutundi?

Posted
21 hours ago, whatsapp said:

Recent ga Uscis audit jarigindhi friend work chese company lo ...

How can u give client letter with longer validity for h1b extension purpose when u know sow is short duration ani ..client edo try chesadu vadi h1 ayipothundhi adi edi any  but uscis officer not convinced why the fcuk you care for that ani + cheating uscis anadu anta . 

Finally Fine of 500k$$ anta. Gorra chachindhi bayya manaki green card radu vedu rod pettadam apadu apatidaka evaru vundaremo e country lo.

This guy is big faker. Client not accountable for contractors simple logic bayya. Client letter clients safe ga clause koda add chestaru veedu naa responsible kadu. Idi nijam aite aa faultoo gadu just threatening client ante. 

Posted
12 minutes ago, AndhraneedSCS said:

Valla general Counsel number USCIS ki ela dorukutundi?

USCIS checks Dunn & Broad Street database to find the general number. When it goes to a receptionist, they tell her they need to speak to the general counsel. If they don't have general counsel, they want to speak to some executive there.  That's one kind of check.

In other cases, USCIS visited the client location and interviewed the client--in this case, the end client is another mesthri.

Here are examples:

"Based upon my research, I learned that in Nov 2012 and May 2014, KCC FPU determined that SQL Data Solutions had previously engaged in fraud relative to H1-B applicants. Specifically, SQL was falsely listed as an end-client for several beneficiaries and was determined to have plagiarized a project description. KCC FPU additionally determined that SQL was unable to provide employment for a previous beneficiary" 

"The contract appeared on Thomson Reuters letterhead and bore the signature of an actual Thomson Reuters rep. The contract was personally signed by KATAM, under peanlty of perjury, on behalf of Prosoft..........The KCC FPU contacted General Counsel for end-client Thomson Reuters in March 2013 to determine whether the application submitted by KATAM was legitimate. Gen Counsel for Reuters reported that it had no agreement with Prosoft or KATAM for EAC-13-097-52371 and the contract submitted by KATAM via Prosoft was done without Reuters's knowledge or consent. Reuters further reported that the signature of Reuters rep was forged..."

"In May 2016 the KCC FPU contacted the president of NYTP (New york technology partners), who stated that the company had no agreement with Prosoft or Katam and that the contract submitted by Prosoft in support for h1-b petition, which appears to be on NYTP letterhead, was forged and submitted without their knowledge or consent."

In the case of Pratap "Bob" kondamoori, USCIS visited the end client; in their indictment, they laid out how bob operated. Bob was friends with some repair company in San Jose. Lets say this company website repar.com. What Bob did was to create repar.net website, and redirected that website to repar.com, and created email addies for his employees on [email protected].

In another case, USCIS visited a medical center run by a desi doc. This doc's kids used to play with a mesthri's kids. Then our mesthri submitted a peku letter on behalf of this medical center. Desi doc told uscis that he never signed such a paper, and that his kids played with that mesthri's kid. In the same indictment, uncle sam viisted a C-store run by a gujju. This gujju asked this mesthri to file h1b petition for his gujju friend, who would work in his c-store. In addition to this requirement, the said mesthri submitted three more client letters on behalf of that gujju c-store guy. This mesthri got caught in a routine audit (that's how the indictment says). They could have had a tip. You never now. For more, study "parallel construction".

 

 

Posted
21 hours ago, whatsapp said:

Recent ga Uscis audit jarigindhi friend work chese company lo ...

How can u give client letter with longer validity for h1b extension purpose when u know sow is short duration ani ..client edo try chesadu vadi h1 ayipothundhi adi edi any  but uscis officer not convinced why the fcuk you care for that ani + cheating uscis anadu anta . 

Finally Fine of 500k$$ anta. Gorra chachindhi bayya manaki green card radu vedu rod pettadam apadu apatidaka evaru vundaremo e country lo.

yeah nenu vinna man client ki $690.69 million and mestri meda $69 million and layers meda cheroo $6.9 million and consultant meda $69.69k fine esi mingesad anta USCIS apicers...so be careful...

  • Confused 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...