Jump to content

Boston University - MBA program


Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Rajugadu said:

100% waive how ba??

 

3 minutes ago, perugu_vada said:

Ela untundi ? 100% full fee waive undi

 

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, perugu_vada said:

Ela untundi ? 100% full fee waive undi

 

go for it.

Posted

If you want an MBA, which can transform your life completely, it is Harvard/Stanford (first tier), next Wharton. After that, people focus on these schools: UChicago Booth, NorthWestern Kellogg, Columbia, MIT Sloan. Once you go down this list, just focus on saving tuition fees, living expenses. 

If you are into IT, and you got into Booth, and if McKinsey hires you, that's a great transformation. Usually, McKinsey doesn't hire as many people from Booth, Kellog as from H/S. At Harvard/Stanford, people reject McKinsey, and they want to work in some private equity (KKR, Black stone). 

Don't pin too many hopes on your MBA degree. You need to struggle to find a job yourself. This is why many universities have started exec-MBA programs everywhere (Cornell MBA in the bay area) to take away money from your savings. Exec-MBA is a cash cow for many schools now. 

I saw a couple of guys moving from MBA program to MS, for sake of STEM OPT. MBA = no stem OPT.

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

mba = manager

try seyyandi

Posted
26 minutes ago, ekunadam_enkanna said:

If you want an MBA, which can transform your life completely, it is Harvard/Stanford (first tier), next Wharton. After that, people focus on these schools: UChicago Booth, NorthWestern Kellogg, Columbia, MIT Sloan. Once you go down this list, just focus on saving tuition fees, living expenses. 

If you are into IT, and you got into Booth, and if McKinsey hires you, that's a great transformation. Usually, McKinsey doesn't hire as many people from Booth, Kellog as from H/S. At Harvard/Stanford, people reject McKinsey, and they want to work in some private equity (KKR, Black stone). 

Don't pin too many hopes on your MBA degree. You need to struggle to find a job yourself. This is why many universities have started exec-MBA programs everywhere (Cornell MBA in the bay area) to take away money from your savings. Exec-MBA is a cash cow for many schools now. 

I saw a couple of guys moving from MBA program to MS, for sake of STEM OPT. MBA = no stem OPT.

 

Stanford offers dual degree MBA. If you're doing a PhD, you can convert to MD/PhD or PhD/MBA without having to pay for it. For MD, you don't have to pay if you convert to MSTP program, should be the same with MBA as well, not sure though. 

Posted
1 hour ago, ekunadam_enkanna said:

If you want an MBA, which can transform your life completely, it is Harvard/Stanford (first tier), next Wharton. After that, people focus on these schools: UChicago Booth, NorthWestern Kellogg, Columbia, MIT Sloan. Once you go down this list, just focus on saving tuition fees, living expenses. 

If you are into IT, and you got into Booth, and if McKinsey hires you, that's a great transformation. Usually, McKinsey doesn't hire as many people from Booth, Kellog as from H/S. At Harvard/Stanford, people reject McKinsey, and they want to work in some private equity (KKR, Black stone). 

Don't pin too many hopes on your MBA degree. You need to struggle to find a job yourself. This is why many universities have started exec-MBA programs everywhere (Cornell MBA in the bay area) to take away money from your savings. Exec-MBA is a cash cow for many schools now. 

I saw a couple of guys moving from MBA program to MS, for sake of STEM OPT. MBA = no stem OPT.

 

H/S lo MBA chesi end of the year one decade lo entha make chestaru on average? Real estate tho @trent and @idibezwada uncles young age lo ne they are talking those numbers. 

Posted
Just now, tacobell fan said:

H/S lo MBA chesi end of the year one decade lo entha make chestaru on average? Real estate tho @trent and @idibezwada uncles young age lo ne they are talking those numbers. 

@tacobell fan uncle middle class anicheppu nalugu illu konesinattena?

  • Haha 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, tacobell fan said:

H/S lo MBA chesi end of the year one decade lo entha make chestaru on average? Real estate tho @tacobell and @idibezwada uncles young age lo ne they are talking those numbers. 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, tacobell fan said:

H/S lo MBA chesi end of the year one decade lo entha make chestaru on average? Real estate tho @trent and @idibezwada uncles young age lo ne they are talking those numbers. 

Well, H/S admits have already a certain pedigree: (a) kids of billionaires or of the powerful, if they show interest: for example, Lokesh, Brahmani, Bharat, son of Parvez Mushraf, even Mukesh Ambani; kids of Indian billionaires, if they show interest;  (b) pedigree in career:  undergrad from top 10, then worked at top tier IB/PE/Consulting; a couple of years later, their bosses at these top tier IB/PE/Consulting push them to go to H/S, and managing directors at these places have direct line to Admissions office at HBS/Stanford GSB; (c)  extra-ordinary folks: olympic medalists; successful in other ventures; (d) people so successful that they don't need MBA, but HBS/Stanford GSB wants them; (d) some ordinary folks like us--even here, being a female helps.

Some of these admits already pull $600K per annum including bonus. So, when they get out, they will make more in IB/PE/Consulting/VC.  When Facebook did not want join the wage-fixing cartel in the bay area, that's when wages for top tier talent in software have spiked: now, you can see people making $400K at top tier companies after four years. 

The kind of opportunities H/S MBA can open are different: if you were a MIT sloan MBA, you could be working as a supply chain manager at Apple( I am giving this example, since FBI busted one such guy who was involved in a kick-back scheme); however, if you were H/S, you could be working under a COO at Apple. That's the difference, a difference that can open the paths to c-suites. If you go to Cisco, every Berkeley Hass MBA is some director with another 3 managers under him; every manager in cisco has some MBA from some place.

Yes, there are many successful people in India without top tier degrees. Again,  they sprung up from a very broad pool---the success rate is just like any lotto. When one is already admitted to HBS/GBS, this group is already pre-selected in terms of their pedigree--career, power, money. So, they have better chances. I also know  a failure: a black dude who got admitted to Stanford GSB long time back, and he got in through some special connection, but he himself is not rich. He is not that successful.

 

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, ekunadam_enkanna said:

Well, H/S admits have already a certain pedigree: (a) kids of billionaires or of the powerful, if they show interest: for example, Lokesh, Brahmani, Bharat, son of Parvez Mushraf, even Mukesh Ambani; kids of Indian billionaires, if they show interest;  (b) pedigree in career:  undergrad from top 10, then worked at top tier IB/PE/Consulting; a couple of years later, their bosses at these top tier IB/PE/Consulting push them to go to H/S, and managing directors at these places have direct line to Admissions office at HBS/Stanford GSB; (c)  extra-ordinary folks: olympic medalists; successful in other ventures; (d) people so successful that they don't need MBA, but HBS/Stanford GSB wants them; (d) some ordinary folks like us--even here, being a female helps.

Some of these admits already pull $600K per annum including bonus. So, when they get out, they will make more in IB/PE/Consulting/VC.  When Facebook did not want join the wage-fixing cartel in the bay area, that's when wages for top tier talent in software have spiked: now, you can see people making $400K at top tier companies after four years. 

The kind of opportunities H/S MBA can open are different: if you were a MIT sloan MBA, you could be working as a supply chain manager at Apple( I am giving this example, since FBI busted one such guy who was involved in a kick-back scheme); however, if you were H/S, you could be working under a COO at Apple. That's the difference, a difference that can open the paths to c-suites. If you go to Cisco, every Berkeley Hass MBA is some director with another 3 managers under him; every manager in cisco has some MBA from some place.

Yes, there are many successful people in India without top tier degrees. Again,  they sprung up from a very broad pool---the success rate is just like any lotto. When one is already admitted to HBS/GBS, this group is already pre-selected in terms of their pedigree--career, power, money. So, they have better chances. I also know  a failure: a black dude who got admitted to Stanford GSB long time back, and he got in through some special connection, but he himself is not rich. He is not that successful.

Degree is a trap, IMO. Jana Chaitanya, Other financiers in Vij, Guntur are multi millionaires without a basic college degree. When you have passion to do something life will have its way to teach

Posted
4 minutes ago, tacobell fan said:

Degree is a trap, IMO. Jana Chaitanya, Other financiers in Vij, Guntur are multi millionaires without a basic college degree. When you have passion to do something life will have its way to teach

S, the purpose of a degree shouldn't be solely to make more money. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, DrBeta said:

S, the purpose of a degree shouldn't be solely to make more money. 

Western world only measure by degree to even give you a chance. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...