tacobell fan Posted May 29, 2019 Report Posted May 29, 2019 Special Counsel Mueller announced he's formally closing his office in his first public statement on the matter. Quote
Sucker Posted May 29, 2019 Report Posted May 29, 2019 10ngeyyamanu maa thatha friends ni family ni ntha torture chesadu Quote
DrBeta Posted May 29, 2019 Report Posted May 29, 2019 The absence of proof is not the proof of absence. In other words, the lack of evidence of collusion doesn't mean there was no collusion. Quote
Variety_Pullayya Posted May 30, 2019 Report Posted May 30, 2019 Stupid does not have guts to come to a conclusion but willing to throw a bone for Democrats. This is never going to end. Good riddance Quote
tacobell fan Posted May 30, 2019 Author Report Posted May 30, 2019 Just now, Variety_Pullayya said: Stupid does not have guts to come to a conclusion but willing to throw a bone for Democrats. This is never going to end. Good riddance This is really surprising effort from Mueller to carefully chose the words neither confirm nor deny the allegations but he clearly concluded Russia interfered in 2016 election. Waste of Money for special counsel, because anyone can speculate what he has concluded. Quote
BDurruti Posted May 30, 2019 Report Posted May 30, 2019 1 hour ago, Variety_Pullayya said: Stupid does not have guts to come to a conclusion but willing to throw a bone for Democrats. This is never going to end. Good riddance 'guts'? lol. its not his job to be gutsy, but to investigate facts and present them. if Trump is claiming all sorts of nonsense, he's just clarifying how he came to the conclusion. Quote
BDurruti Posted May 30, 2019 Report Posted May 30, 2019 1 hour ago, tacobell fan said: This is really surprising effort from Mueller to carefully chose the words neither confirm nor deny the allegations but he clearly concluded Russia interfered in 2016 election. Waste of Money for special counsel, because anyone can speculate what he has concluded. how is it waste of money? that's like claiming studying migratory patterns of birds is a waste of money, because you found and mentioned outliers in your report about how some birds don't migrate. There may not be evidence of collusion, but Trump can have a public hearing, and get insulted left and right, if the democrats play it right. The bugger is good only when he's allowed to talk without being interrupted. Its now a political case, not a criminal one, because there's no evidence of criminal activity. And also because trump obstructed the investigation in many ways. Quote
BDurruti Posted May 30, 2019 Report Posted May 30, 2019 this is simply a political issue now. Whether Trump can be made to face impeachment proceedings, and how he can withstand hours of public hearing, without uttering lies that indicts himself anedhey ippudu circus. if he's really a genius, and he's been acting dumb all along, he'll escape, or he'll be toast. he'll be absolutely humiliated by the house committee, like Ben Carson was, Steve Mnuchin was, and several trump appointees were in the last few years. Quote
tacobell fan Posted May 30, 2019 Author Report Posted May 30, 2019 Just now, BDurruti said: how is it waste of money? that's like claiming studying migratory patterns of birds is a waste of money, because you found and mentioned outliers in your report about how some birds don't migrate. There may not be evidence of collusion, but Trump can have a public hearing, and get insulted left and right, if the democrats play it right. The bugger is good only when he's allowed to talk without being interrupted. Its now a political case, not a criminal one, because there's no evidence of criminal activity. And also because trump obstructed the investigation in many ways. The purpose on Special Counsel is to solve a case and it needs to be concluded either yes or no. He just opened a two edge sword and it can lead to many conclusions by several analysts because the creator does not have a guided answer. Quote
BDurruti Posted May 30, 2019 Report Posted May 30, 2019 1 minute ago, tacobell fan said: The purpose on Special Counsel is to solve a case and it needs to be concluded either yes or no. He just opened a two edge sword and it can lead to many conclusions by several analysts because the creator does not have a guided answer. you are just making up facts now. he's already concluded that there's no collusion, but there was obstruction. and that he can't indict him for obstruction, but the house can ani. what is the two edged sword here? Quote
BDurruti Posted May 30, 2019 Report Posted May 30, 2019 3 minutes ago, tacobell fan said: The purpose on Special Counsel is to solve a case and it needs to be concluded either yes or no. He just opened a two edge sword and it can lead to many conclusions by several analysts because the creator does not have a guided answer. speaking of waste of money, benghazi hearings that went on for how many years? well into Obama's second term. How many committees did Hillary face? in contrast, this fuckface hasn't given even a single interview to the special counsel. he's being let off easy. and even then his toadies cry like b1tches. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.