Robert Mueller announces he's resigning in his first public statement on the Russia probe

[tacobell fan]

2 minutes ago, BDurruti said:

you are just making up facts now. he's already concluded that there's no collusion, but there was obstruction.

and that he can't indict him for obstruction, but the house can ani. what is the two edged sword here?

Republicans won't even agree that there was an obstruction either because Muller did not directly say this. 

[BDurruti]

2 minutes ago, tacobell fan said:

Republicans won't even agree that there was an obstruction either because Muller did not directly say this. 

He literally directly asked the house to indict the MFer for obstruction.

republicans are debating if what he did constituted obstruction. ofcourse mueller directly said it.

[Variety_Pullayya]

12 minutes ago, BDurruti said:

'guts'? lol. its not his job to be gutsy, but to investigate facts and present them. if Trump is claiming all sorts of nonsense, he's just clarifying how he came to the conclusion.

he has no guts because he did not come to a conclusion on obstruction. being a prosecutor if he knew that there is not enough evidence to charge...he should say he is not guilty or atleast asked IG to prosecute based on the evidence . but mueller instead left it open for IG to decide and left the ball hanging . now more years of same bullshit without any new evidence.

 

[BDurruti]

6 minutes ago, Variety_Pullayya said:

he has no guts because he did not come to a conclusion on obstruction. being a prosecutor if he knew that there is not enough evidence to charge...he should say he is not guilty or atleast asked IG to prosecute based on the evidence . but mueller instead left it open for IG to decide and left the ball hanging . now more years of same bullshit without any new evidence.

 

Its not his job to conclude on obstruction. he stated that his investigation was obstructed and gave instances where the obstruction happened and how. and that's enough. Enough proof to impeach the MFer.

He didn't leave it open dude. he literally said that its not in his power to indict him for obstruction, but for the house ani.

how clear do you want him to be? lol.

[Variety_Pullayya]

12 minutes ago, BDurruti said:

He literally directly asked the house to indict the MFer for obstruction.

republicans are debating if what he did constituted obstruction. ofcourse mueller directly said it.

senate will never approve. if tables turn and republicans get to show how desperate the left is that they will start impeachment without sufficient evidence as given in report...things will go bad for them. people are not stupid to see that the report did not have evidence of collusion. what is he obstructing when there is no collusion. how will they explain all the resources provided by white house(docs and interviews) which could have been blocked by Trump if he indeed wants to bury something and that too legally?

[BDurruti]

Trump should be brought on to face public hearings, and his entire life be torn apart.

[BDurruti]

1 minute ago, Variety_Pullayya said:

senate will never approve. if tables turn and republicans get to show how desperate the left is that they will start impeachment without sufficient evidence as given in report...things will go bad for them. people are not stupid to see that the report did not have evidence of collusion. what is he obstructing when there is no collusion. how will they explain all the resources provided by white house(docs and interviews) which could have been blocked by Trump if he indeed wants to bury something and that too legally?

senate doesn't start these proceedings.. you have no idea what you are saying. Senate only tries the accused. ofcourse Trump will not be removed from office, but he can be made to look like bumbling fool in public.

these proceedings will be public.

[BDurruti]

5 minutes ago, Variety_Pullayya said:

senate will never approve. if tables turn and republicans get to show how desperate the left is that they will start impeachment without sufficient evidence as given in report...things will go bad for them. people are not stupid to see that the report did not have evidence of collusion. what is he obstructing when there is no collusion. how will they explain all the resources provided by white house(docs and interviews) which could have been blocked by Trump if he indeed wants to bury something and that too legally?

the idea is to humiliate Trump, and expose him as a fraud. What the voters do after that, is upto them.

[BDurruti]

7 minutes ago, Variety_Pullayya said:

senate will never approve. if tables turn and republicans get to show how desperate the left is that they will start impeachment without sufficient evidence as given in report...things will go bad for them. people are not stupid to see that the report did not have evidence of collusion. what is he obstructing when there is no collusion. how will they explain all the resources provided by white house(docs and interviews) which could have been blocked by Trump if he indeed wants to bury something and that too legally?

Trump edho pedda pudingi laaga, he's daring dems to impeach him. vaadu committee ki ochi, if he's able to turn the tables on dems, he'll win. its a simple political calculation. I don't think he can.

[BDurruti]

9 minutes ago, Variety_Pullayya said:

senate will never approve. if tables turn and republicans get to show how desperate the left is that they will start impeachment without sufficient evidence as given in report...things will go bad for them. people are not stupid to see that the report did not have evidence of collusion. what is he obstructing when there is no collusion. how will they explain all the resources provided by white house(docs and interviews) which could have been blocked by Trump if he indeed wants to bury something and that too legally?

Trump chuttu vaadi pempudu kukkalu unnayi. chettha arguments tho, lies tho, issue ni laagi laagi, janala mind lo confusion create chesthondi.

privately, they are afraid of impeachment hearing.

Pelosi oka boku. dems are useless. Clinton ni impeach chesinappudu, asalu case ki sambandam leni vishayam meedha impeachment proceedings start chesaru.

nuvvu edho mueller didn't confirm etc ani sollu chepthunnav. he doesn't have to. Trump will have to face public hearings. I'm waiting for it.

I know he won't be removed from office, but I want to see smart democrats attack this mfer in a public stage, where they call all the shots.

[Variety_Pullayya]

13 minutes ago, BDurruti said:

the idea is to humiliate Trump, and expose him as a fraud. What the voters do after that, is upto them.

yes.based on how it stands now...libs will be the ones who will be left humiliated and exposed of their desperation.

[BDurruti]

Just now, Variety_Pullayya said:

yes.based on how it stands now...libs will be the ones who will be left humiliated and exposed of their desperation.

lol. you do realise that its a republican who started the proceedings, right? dems already have the house majority, and impeaching the president is no issue for them.

only if Trump puts on a good show (unlikely cause he's a bumbling fool) in the public hearings, can the dems be humiliated.

do you really trust Trump to answer questions without obfuscating them, or going off on an idiotic rant where he indicts himself? lol.

[BDurruti]

9 minutes ago, Variety_Pullayya said:

yes.based on how it stands now...libs will be the ones who will be left humiliated and exposed of their desperation.

the only issue is to convince the dems who are up for reelection in 2020 in the house, to vote for impeachment.

only if you side with the racists, do you think dems can be humiliated, because what they are doing is consittutional and by the book.