Social media lo unanimous support vocchesindhi ga Sandeep reddy vanga ki

[pottipotato]

1 minute ago, Android_Halwa said:

So you mean, what ever the criticisms, the director should take it easy and their opinions doesn’t matter ? 

Just like so called critics criticized the movie, the movie maker has criticized the critics...its a loop. I don’t see a point why not ?

yes, the movie made 300cr anta. he can't take criticisms aa? lol.

the movie maker made a disgusting comment, and he's getting called out on his assholery. its perfectly fine.

[pottipotato]

2 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said:

So you mean, what ever the criticisms, the director should take it easy and their opinions doesn’t matter ? 

Just like so called critics criticized the movie, the movie maker has criticized the critics...its a loop. I don’t see a point why not ?

the director is misogynist fcuking prick moron. so yes, he deserves to be soundly bashed for his idiocy.

unfortunately, there's thsi upswing of sex starved males supporting this idiot. so he became a hero. lol.

[JambuLingam]

14 minutes ago, pottipotato said:

nenu ninna ney adiga ninnu oka question. no answer ani cheppav. malli discussion enduku? you have no answer to what I ask. simple. just 10 mandhi nee pov ni oppukuntey correct aypodu nee pov.

you still have to answer my question.

my question is- repeat again:

Telugu lo release aynappudu, arjun reddy is not an ideal man, he was designed to invoke disgust and anger to the watching public, and his actions are not meant to be taken in a positive context ani clear ga cheppadu. so ippudu enduku Kabir Singh did so and so out of love ani sollu chepthunnadu? tell.

i said no answer as you are putting up the points just to make your view look correct. When he was speaking about arjun reddy, he was referring to n number of things in the movie, like snorting, drinking, smoking and performing surgery in inebriated condition, and in this case he was referring to slapping incident. 

explanation here seems sensible, his focus is on emotion and liberty rather than slapping. But fake feminists turned the statement into slapping and physical abuse should be a part of relationship. no point in fighting a misinterpreted statement.

[pottipotato]

1 minute ago, JambuLingam said:

i said no answer as you are putting up the points just to make your view look correct. When he was speaking about arjun reddy, he was referring to n number of things in the movie, like snorting, drinking, smoking and performing surgery in inebriated condition, and in this case he was referring to slapping incident. 

explanation here seems sensible, his focus is on emotion and liberty rather than slapping. But fake feminists turned the statement into slapping and physical abuse should be a part of relationship. no point in fighting a misinterpreted statement.

his explanation is not sensible in the least bit. he basically said that those critics who didn't experience even the possibility of violence in a relationship, haven't been in a relationship.

he's basically endorsing violence in a relationship. do you know that life is not a movie? him romanticising abuse in a movie is fine. its just a movie, but why is he talking about it, like its okay? its not okay, dude.

people in love don't hit each other. he could've said that Arjun Reddy is in love with himself more than that girl, or something like that. his understanding of love is pretty incomplete, and his articulation skills are pathetic.

he should simply stick to making movies, and keeping his mouth shut. as long as the censors allow his movie to be screened, why does he care what others talk about his movie?

[pottipotato]

6 minutes ago, JambuLingam said:

i said no answer as you are putting up the points just to make your view look correct. When he was speaking about arjun reddy, he was referring to n number of things in the movie, like snorting, drinking, smoking and performing surgery in inebriated condition, and in this case he was referring to slapping incident. 

explanation here seems sensible, his focus is on emotion and liberty rather than slapping. But fake feminists turned the statement into slapping and physical abuse should be a part of relationship. no point in fighting a misinterpreted statement.

you are the one conveniently misinterpreting it, and defending him. he was clear about what he said. and he deserves to get pillored for it. its basic basic stuff.

no need to energize the abusive men and encourage them to be even more assholes than they already are.

[pottipotato]

first of all, Arjun Reddy is a confused characterization. This piece of sh1t director thinks he's made a masterpiece, because he found someone who can be a rebellious genius, and still be a loverboi.

this director is delsional. and should be a pain to be around.

[pottipotato]

Arjun Reddy is 80s love story with 00's boothulu. daanikey intha scene aa..

I don't understand what kind of youth liked this utterly mediocre movie.

I sort of expected Arjun Reddy to be working on some body modification to have two dciks, and doing a double pen on the heroine, just to show how much he wants her.

instead this Arjun boi is a boring class topper, and a football goon. and this is what people like in 2019? lol.

[JambuLingam]

10 minutes ago, pottipotato said:

his explanation is not sensible in the least bit. he basically said that those critics who didn't experience even the possibility of violence in a relationship, haven't been in a relationship.

he's basically endorsing violence in a relationship. do you know that life is not a movie? him romanticising abuse in a movie is fine. its just a movie, but why is he talking about it, like its okay? its not okay, dude.

people in love don't hit each other. he could've said that Arjun Reddy is in love with himself more than that girl, or something like that. his understanding of love is pretty incomplete, and his articulation skills are pathetic.

he should simply stick to making movies, and keeping his mouth shut. as long as the censors allow his movie to be screened, why does he care what others talk about his movie?

okay.

[pottipotato]

basically the director doesn't understand Arjun Reddy himself, beyond the macho stuff, and the forced drug obsession, which makes zero sense.. and his sudden fame as the famed surgeon, 8 months after he completed his degree..

what the fcuk is  this movie. the director should just be happy that he tricked people into believing its a good film, and keep his mouth shut.

if he pisses on feminists, and the real critics come out, he'll probably go into depression. lol.

[pootareku]

Sandeep vijay heroine all happy why are you fighting 

[pottipotato]

6 minutes ago, pootareku said:

Sandeep vijay heroine all happy why are you fighting 

who's fighting? this is how discussions are.

why are you so sensitive lol.

I'm teaching this db how discussions should be. they don't want to learn. losers.

[pottipotato]

the only kind of discussions people here are equipped to have is sweet talking with each other. or ganging up against one guy or one group.

or basically repeat bullshit ideas they are indoctrinated by, from somewhere, and refusing to reason it out clearly.

I'm sent by god as a demonstration of how to actually argue. learn from me.

 

[pottipotato]

God wants you to learn from me. yeah krishna, rama, and all the 33 crore gods messenger I'm.

I have a 1000 d1cks.

[sattipandu]

6 minutes ago, pottipotato said:

God wants you to learn from me. yeah krishna, rama, and all the 33 crore gods messenger I'm.

I have a 1000 d1cks.

LoL how many bolls Ani @TOM_BHAYYA asking 

[pottipotato]

7 minutes ago, sattipandu said:

LoL how many bolls Ani @TOM_BHAYYA asking 

good question. zero balls. we have redesigned to secrete the magic baby making fluid directly from the brain. that way orgasms last long too. sometimes for weeks.