Arundathi Roy ni baga mingutunnar gaa

[lovemystate]

Arundhati roy is just a five star activiist. Born to upper classes she studies oppressed classes never to help them but to profit from their sufferings through her writings. That kashmiri boy picking a stone against an armored vehicle  OR an illiterate telugu farmer his their gun in telangana sayudha proratam  under the banner of visalandhra against razakas did far more to establish justice than these arundhati roy.

[kevinUsa]

54 minutes ago, sboyr2r said:

Secular kaadu vaa mana country, we never or neither cared about anything. Mana constitution lo kuda ledu secularism ane word until 42nd amendment. 

Secularism needed for other peaceful religions. 

India was a secular by all means before British, Mughals, before Christ, and it will be now and after forever. We Indians don’t need preaching from other b/bs to remind us something. 

Constitution lo petti enforce cheyalsina avasarm ley. 

can you say that Islam is a violent religion ?

the basic inception of your theory is wrong. there is no good or bad religion

violent or peaceful religion,

but the people in that religion are bad and violent.

right to equality and freedom of expression are our fundamental rights

if I cannot express my religious thoughts why do we have freedom of expression?

[sboyr2r]

11 minutes ago, kevinUsa said:

can you say that Islam is a violent religion ?

the basic inception of your theory is wrong. there is no good or bad religion

violent or peaceful religion,

but the people in that religion are bad and violent.

right to equality and freedom of expression are our fundamental rights

if I cannot express my religious thoughts why do we have freedom of expression?

rey kevinu  nenu esina post ki nuvvu esina post ki emanna relation vunda ?  

Ninnu evadu follow avoddu annadu ee religion ni anna. poyi first fundamental rights saduvukoni raa poo. 

[simha2727]

8 minutes ago, sboyr2r said:

rey kevinu  nenu esina post ki nuvvu esina post ki emanna relation vunda ?  

Ninnu evadu follow avoddu annadu ee religion ni anna. poyi first fundamental rights saduvukoni raa poo. 

[Respected_Sir]

Ghana charitra unna prati desham lo ilanti kondaru bogam munjalu daridrapu munjakodukulu untaaru. 

[Meow]

5 hours ago, Staysafebro said:

@lovemystate @Meow

I don't like Arundathy Roy. What's your point? 

[Staysafebro]

8 hours ago, Charger said:

whats her problem. as a respected citizen of india?

 

The problem is with other countries meddling with India. How do you defeat a country? You either wage a war or break it from the inside. You can’t wage a war against a country like India so break it. How do you break it from the inside? Have mouthpieces who will always criticize the government and basically the country on the whole. There are many countries that don’t want India to prosper. These mouthpieces are mostly news anchors, authors and your local radio station hosts. They mostly tell lies and are paid or sometimes conditioned to say those things.

Now coming to the point, why would someone like Arundhati Roy always criticize India? She has fought on many social issues before and is quite famous. She wrote the booker prize winning “The God of Small Things” after all. One would think that she has noble intentions. Why not yeah? She started of on the right note from the beginning. She could have chosen to stop at feminism at the end of the day. But she didn’t. Every country has issues related to women’s rights. So what do these outsiders do? They will say women are suffering in your country the most (ironic isn’t it given that there are similar issues with women in every country), but they will say that anyway. So these people will talk about women’s issues and people like @AleAle and @meri_zindagi will be influenced by them. Everything is fine until here. No complaints.

Now another activist will be influenced on some other issue like poverty. “Your country is poor, blame the government”. @Meow is influenced. Fine again. Some other activist will be influenced by saying that your country is plagued by casteist hot heads. Another issue raised. So on and so forth, they keep telling bad things about India. Once that is done, they will talk about the real things that they want India to lose for ex. Kashmir. Some activist ( @lovemystate ) will be told that Kashmir is not India’s to have. Another one will be told “India is a very bad country, please break it.” ( @uttermost ) Now that is a problem. If you see the chain of events, it started off with social activism to criticizing the integrity of the nation. At the end of the day these activists have been brainwashed into thinking that way. They may not be paid, but reputation is a handsome salary for them. They want a lot of people to criticize India so we start thinking that we are in the wrong. Say a bunch of lies and mix in your real intentions so that people follow through with all of them like sheep. 

[Meow]

2 hours ago, Staysafebro said:

The problem is with other countries meddling with India. How do you defeat a country? You either wage a war or break it from the inside. You can’t wage a war against a country like India so break it. How do you break it from the inside? Have mouthpieces who will always criticize the government and basically the country on the whole. There are many countries that don’t want India to prosper. These mouthpieces are mostly news anchors, authors and your local radio station hosts. They mostly tell lies and are paid or sometimes conditioned to say those things.

Now coming to the point, why would someone like Arundhati Roy always criticize India? She has fought on many social issues before and is quite famous. She wrote the booker prize winning “God of small things” after all. One would think that she has noble intentions. Why not yeah? She started of on the right note from the beginning. She could have chosen to stop at feminism at the end of the day? But she didn’t. Every country has issues related to women’s rights. So what do these outsiders do? They will say women are suffering in your country (ironic isn’t it given that there are similar issues with women in every country), but they will say that anyway. So these people will talk about women’s issues and people like @AleAle and @meri_zindagi will be influenced by them. Everything is fine until here. No complaints.

Now another activist will be influenced on some other issue like poverty. “You country is poor, blame the government”. @Meow is influenced. Fine again. Some other activist will be influenced by saying that your country is plagued by casteist hot heads. Another issue raised. So on and so forth they keep telling bad things about India. Once that is done they will talk about the real things that they want India to lose for ex. Kashmir. Some activist ( @lovemystate ) will be told that Kashmir is not India’s to have. Another one will be told “India is a very bad country, please break it.” ( @uttermost ) Now that is a problem. If you see the chain of events, it started off with social activism to criticizing the integrity of the nation. At the end of the day these activists have been brainwashed into thinking that way. They may not be paid, but reputation is a handsome salary for them. They want a lot of people to criticize India so we start thinking that we are in the wrong. Say a bunch of lies and mix in your real intentions so that people follow through with all of them like sheep. 

The inability to understand sarcasm is an early sign of brain disease. 

[kingcasanova]

9 hours ago, AleAle said:

i dont think so , chinapdu arundathi roy vi manchi articles chadiva its about women , narmada river related stuff

ipdu anti india ante shocking ga undi

aaa articles anni foundation course lo part, janalni gorrelni cheyyadaaniki, ndtv popular ayyaaka veella ranku lu anni bayatapaddaayi, even The Hindu goes too low in distabilising the country

[Kontekurradu]

15 hours ago, kevinUsa said:

can you say that Islam is a violent religion ?

the basic inception of your theory is wrong. there is no good or bad religion

violent or peaceful religion,

but the people in that religion are bad and violent.

right to equality and freedom of expression are our fundamental rights

if I cannot express my religious thoughts why do we have freedom of expression?

arey battu manaki denikira ee religion godava, mundu job techukundam
aa tarvatha felli peru tho katnam 10gudam
mundu aa pani suddam da 

[sboyr2r]

1 minute ago, Kontekurradu said:

arey battu manaki denikira ee religion godava, mundu job techukundam
aa tarvatha felli peru tho katnam 10gudam
mundu aa pani suddam da 

Vaaniki lower caste vallatoh ela kurchoni tintam, Inter caste marriage aithe ani dhavada aaku requirements vuntayyii kaani 

freedom of religion ani 

fundamental rights ani dhavada aaku eshalu estunduu 

[Respected_Sir]

Aapandi mee edava gola manchi vintage bikini pics vesukondi

[kevinUsa]

16 minutes ago, Kontekurradu said:

arey battu manaki denikira ee religion godava, mundu job techukundam
aa tarvatha felli peru tho katnam 10gudam
mundu aa pani suddam da 

Desh ke lite much karna hai 

[Kontekurradu]

7 minutes ago, kevinUsa said:

Desh ke lite much karna hai 

[argadorn]

16 hours ago, kevinUsa said:

can you say that Islam is a violent religion ?

the basic inception of your theory is wrong. there is no good or bad religion

violent or peaceful religion,

but the people in that religion are bad and violent.

right to equality and freedom of expression are our fundamental rights

if I cannot express my religious thoughts why do we have freedom of expression?

konni mathalo undhi kafir aney words ah book loney unayi ...kohaga kanipettinayi kavu