DB feminists deeniki em cheptharoo chudali ani vundii

[Ellen]

40 minutes ago, proudtobeandhrite said:

If he knew she was parasitic and lecherous woman, then he shouldn't have married in the first place.

He is cheap because he didn't go into marriage with Trust, on the other hand by signing the prenup his wife put more trust in the marriage than him.

@Scurvy Igo these logics  endendo cheptaru itla ...that is why that lolli is ugly and cheap 

[pencil]

6 minutes ago, Ellen said:

The concept of prenup is cheap. Bezos worked his ass off....made billions and this woman simply leeched off him...that is cheap anna. 

renditiki sambandam enti.. 

doctor offices leech off patients andukani insurance teeskuntaru.. so concept of insurance is cheap annattu undhi.. 

[Ellen]

8 minutes ago, pencil said:

renditiki sambandam enti.. 

doctor offices leech off patients andukani insurance teeskuntaru.. so concept of insurance is cheap annattu undhi.. 

okasari ee comment revise chesko nuvve  . Prenup is not insurance. a woman who is well educated, can sustain by herself ; why would she need her husband's hard earned money, unles she invested in the business? it is unfair for him. There are exceptional cases..those who undergo domestic violence , torture or those gave dowry or invested equally in business etc..........vallani nen anatledu. I am talking about the peculiar cases where alimony is just from one side. Bigger joke is people supporting that with logics like above. Edo iga support cheyali kabatti chestaru laaga undi. 

[Catabolite]

I am lucky. 

[Ellen]

1 minute ago, Catabolite said:

I am lucky. 

Because you are married to rats?

[Scada]

1 minute ago, Catabolite said:

I am lucky. 

why da @Pillipilla 

[Catabolite]

12 minutes ago, Scada said:

why da @Pillipilla 

Because, stories like these make me think that I am grateful for what I have. 

[sboyr2r]

16 minutes ago, Ellen said:

okasari ee comment revise chesko nuvve  . Prenup is not insurance. a woman who is well educated, can sustain by herself ; why would she need her husband's hard earned money, unles she invested in the business? it is unfair for him. There are exceptional cases..those who undergo domestic violence , torture or those gave dowry or invested equally in business etc..........vallani nen anatledu. I am talking about the peculiar cases where alimony is just from one side. Bigger joke is people supporting that with logics like above. Edo iga support cheyali kabatti chestaru laaga undi. 

she supported him when he left the job and setup amazon as his fulltime career in a sense she invested in his business morally emotionally ani antunna @dbfeminists

[johnydanylee]

Sachadu koduku

[pencil]

1 hour ago, Ellen said:

okasari ee comment revise chesko nuvve  . Prenup is not insurance. a woman who is well educated, can sustain by herself ; why would she need her husband's hard earned money, unles she invested in the business? it is unfair for him. There are exceptional cases..those who undergo domestic violence , torture or those gave dowry or invested equally in business etc..........vallani nen anatledu. I am talking about the peculiar cases where alimony is just from one side. Bigger joke is people supporting that with logics like above. Edo iga support cheyali kabatti chestaru laaga undi. 

who decides unfair? both sides will have their version.. anduke prenup undedi.. 

[Android_Halwa]

feminists ledu na bonda ledu...emaitadi vaa...inko 4 rojula tarvata vachi case wapas anna teesukuntadi...lekapothey naluguru peddhiillu kusapetti compromise aina sestaru....adi kuda tegakapothey divorce teesukuni potaru, aasthi gitla sagam sagam panchukuntaru....sachin bansal gadu emana howlada endi ? look at the surnames involved..Bansal,Aggarwal...and one of them becomes filthy rich and what do we expect, a smooth sailing here after ? No way...ipatiki sachin bansal gadu motham dobbesi 2nd accounts lo vesesi vuntadu..

overall ga...case vesina pellam ki bokka...big hole, she lost life time negotiating power with a rich man..

 

[Ellen]

59 minutes ago, pencil said:

who decides unfair? both sides will have their version.. anduke prenup undedi.. 

Ok

[TheBrahmabull]

2 hours ago, Ellen said:

best movie on this earth asal  atletla miss chesinav

you lol bob pan

[Agnes]

3 hours ago, Ellen said:

The concept of prenup is cheap. Bezos worked his ass off....made billions and this woman simply leeched off him...that is cheap anna. But i have seen some feminazis taking her side and justifying her getting alimony from him....even though they r wrong. they fought in the name of feminism. that is why it is cheap

No idea about what Bezos's wife got in alimony, but anything is fair. Its not cheap. this is how the law is written, and she would be stupid to leave that all walk off the marriage, after giving up 20+yrs of her life for him.

she fought and got her share. how much she got, I don't know. even if she got 50%, its fine.

If Bezos wanted to keep all the money himself, he should have broken the relationship before he got rich. he can't have the cake and eat it too.

[Agnes]

3 hours ago, Ellen said:

The concept of prenup is cheap. Bezos worked his ass off....made billions and this woman simply leeched off him...that is cheap anna. But i have seen some feminazis taking her side and justifying her getting alimony from him....even though they r wrong. they fought in the name of feminism. that is why it is cheap

prenups have no value.

She could've made his life miserable if she was self centered and demanded attention while he was building a business.

I think people who want companionship, should accept responsibilities that come with it. you can't simply live your own life, and turn around and kick them out when its convenient to you.

it has nothing to do with feminism.