Jump to content

Via Local Commie Underlings, Beijing Officially Disapproves


Recommended Posts

Posted

The Daily Telegraph this week received a letter from the Australian Consulate General of the People's Republic of China, who took gentle issue with our excellent coverage of the coronavirus crisis.

Following is a point-by-point response to the Consulate General and China’s communist dictatorship:

Recently the Daily Telegraph has published a number of reports and opinions about China’s response to COVID-19 that are full of ignorance, prejudice and arrogance.

If a state-owned newspaper in China received this kind of complaint, subsequent days would involve journalists waking up in prison with their organs harvested.

Tracing the origin of the virus is a scientific issue that requires professional, science-based assessment.

Sure it does. How professional and science-based was the claim published on March 12 by China’s foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian that “it might be US Army who brought the epidemic to Wuhan”?

Posted

The origin of the virus is still undetermined, and the World Health Organization has named the novel coronavirus “COVID-19”.

The World Health Organisation also appointed Zimbabwean murderer Robert Mugabe as its Goodwill Ambassador and declared on March 2 that the “stigma” of the coronavirus “is more dangerous than the virus itself”.

The World Health Organisation does a lot of stupid stuff.

So what is the real motive behind your attempt to repeatedly link the virus to China and even stating that the novel coronavirus was “made in China”?

Our motive is accuracy. That’s why we don’t link the virus to Bognor Regis or state that it was “made in Panama”.

The people of Wuhan made a huge effort and personal sacrifice to stop the spread of the epidemic.

Wuhan’s Dr Li Wenliang indeed made a huge effort to warn people about the coronavirus outbreak. Then, as the New York Timesreported: “In early January, he was called in by both medical officials and the police, and forced to sign a statement denouncing his warning as an unfounded and illegal rumor.”

And now he’s dead, so that’s “personal sacrifice” covered as well.

Posted

Nevertheless, in order to capture attention and gain more internet hits, you called Wuhan the “Zombieland” and Wuhan seafood market the “bat market”. How low can you go?

In the civilised world, “Bradman bats and bats and bats” is a famous newspaper banner:

Set menu Set menu

In Wuhan, it’s the name of a restaurant.

The effectiveness of China's epidemic prevention and control has fully underlined the people-centred philosophy of the Communist Party of China and the strong advantages of the Chinese system.

In 2018, Amnesty International reported that China executed more citizens than the rest of the world combined.

Please tell us more about your “people-centred philosophy” and how many bullets it requires.

Posted

Instead of admitting and facing facts, the articles in your newspaper have wantonly attacked and smeared the CPC and the Chinese government with vicious language.

And yet we haven’t been jailed or shot! Where’s the justice in that?

Is your judgement based on the well-being of the people or do you have an ideological prejudice?

We will admit to an ideological prejudice against deadly tyranny. It’s a tragic failing on our part.

Since 3 January, China has been updating the WHO and the international community in a timely and transparent manner.

On January 14, following 11 days of “timely and transparent” updates, the WHO broadcast this ridiculous Chinese misinformation:
Twitter link

The epidemic is spreading rapidly around the globe, and China is doing its utmost to support other severely affected countries.

Thousands of Chinese-made coronavirus testing kits and medical masks exported to Spain, Turkey and the Netherlands turned out to be "below standard or defective”, according to the BBC.

And the ABC this week reported that more than 800,000 masks have been seized by Australian Border Force officers after the masks were “found to be counterfeit or otherwise faulty”.

Thanks for all your help, guys.

Virus respects no borders.

Why, then, did China close its own borders on March 28 – even while claiming victory over the spread of coronavirus?

 

 

 

Posted

You have repeatedly questioned the WHO’s positive assessment of China's epidemic prevention and control, but surely you know that the WHO is the most authoritative international organization in global public health, with more than 190 members including Australia?

Keep an eye on that number, sunshine.

In disregard of the authoritative information provided by China and the WHO's professional opinions, you instead quoted several so-called “strategic analysts” …

Were you aware that the institution where these people work have been exposed as long accepting financial support from the US government … ?

The US last year contributed nearly $900 million to the sacred WHO. Your point, sir?

Your recent coverage on the epidemic in China are exaggerated, full of irresponsible rumours and highly politicized.

Naughty us.

Please send an official Dr Li Wenliang “unfounded and illegal rumour” denunciation statement so we can sign it and be on our way.

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, tacobell fan said:

Easy ga use this link

 

Delight to read it in the print 

Posted
Just now, Mirage said:

Delight to read it in the print 

reading or watching doesn't make any difference. What matters is how you perceive this and pass this info to other people.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, tacobell fan said:

reading or watching doesn't make any difference. What matters is how you perceive this and pass this info to other people.

You mean dissemination of how Chinki regime and chinese virus fcuked up the world?


People whose senses are on will do their research. And others will get carried away by one narrative or the other anyway. If this situation doesn’t wake up one nothing will

Posted

twitter troll lekka unnadu. 

this is what passes for journalism these days.. lol. 

private letter ki public reply.

Posted
3 minutes ago, TrollBait said:

twitter troll lekka unnadu. 

this is what passes for journalism these days.. lol. 

private letter ki public reply.

yeah, only China has the right to troll the world and have the rights to dictate on what constitutes as journalism 

Posted
Just now, Mirage said:

yeah, only China has the right to troll the world and have the rights to dictate on what constitutes as journalism 

you understand the difference between a private letter to the newspaper? and a public column full of what-aboutery?

is there any evidence for what that journalist published or he just wants to escape scrutiny by pointing to random Chinese officials statements as excuse for his evidence free journalism?

people are in a hurry to ascribe motives these days. atleast turn your guns towards things that you can control - like your govt.

whatever the chinese did or didn't do, is immaterial to Australia or the US or the world. Its their own govts that failed them. And these journalists are covering for their own govts shamelessly by writing this kind of meaningless pieces.

Posted
17 minutes ago, Mirage said:

You mean dissemination of how Chinki regime and chinese virus fcuked up the world?


People whose senses are on will do their research. And others will get carried away by one narrative or the other anyway. If this situation doesn’t wake up one nothing will

Can't help it but it's funny. During SARS/Ebola/Swine Flu break out people did not cry this much from the country it originated because of extending grudge on China for all along causing this to push further and further. Let's worry about how to preserve human race from such nightmares. Then we can blame on where it originated. 

Posted
1 minute ago, tacobell fan said:

Can't help it but it's funny. During SARS/Ebola/Swine Flu break out people did not cry this much from the country it originated because of extending grudge on China for all along causing this to push further and further. Let's worry about how to preserve human race from such nightmares. Then we can blame on where it originated. 

a4RvqAQ_460swp.webp

  • Haha 1
Posted
28 minutes ago, TrollBait said:

you understand the difference between a private letter to the newspaper? and a public column full of what-aboutery?

is there any evidence for what that journalist published or he just wants to escape scrutiny by pointing to random Chinese officials statements as excuse for his evidence free journalism?

people are in a hurry to ascribe motives these days. atleast turn your guns towards things that you can control - like your govt.

whatever the chinese did or didn't do, is immaterial to Australia or the US or the world. Its their own govts that failed them. And these journalists are covering for their own govts shamelessly by writing this kind of meaningless pieces.

You may draw your own conclusions. 

There is a breach of trust hence the rebuttal. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...