Silverado Posted May 20, 2020 Report Posted May 20, 2020 12 minutes ago, DummyVariable said: @Silverado Question for you. We know that Bose was aligned with the Japanese at the time. If Bose had won against the Raj and if India went under Japanese control, wouldn’t we be worse off given the history of Japanese invasions and their human rights abuses in the countries they occupied? 🤔 I don't think so INA only taking tactical support and military equipment,no military from them So after winning India ,INA will friendly ally to Japan not an invaded territory Quote
JaiTDP Posted May 20, 2020 Report Posted May 20, 2020 10 minutes ago, Mr Mirchi said: Correct vere country lo gandhi ki manchi peru vundhi adhi manavaalle chedadhobbuthunnaaru...may be gandhi wrong side vundochu .. dhani valla godse shoot chesi vundochu... leni manishi meedha edhoti gelakavalisina avasaram ledhu.. gandhi vundi vundi bad for society or wrong angles vunnavi anukunte u can critize sonce he is alive... bjp ni satisfy cheyataniki e thuppasi babu gadu deniki post lu moosukoni kuthuriki pelli chupulu chudaka Gandhi ni akkademi thittaledhu ga NB - verey athanini pogidinaadu. adhedho Gandhi ni sampinatlu endhuku chusthaaru - I just don't understand. Quote
reality Posted May 20, 2020 Report Posted May 20, 2020 Just now, JaiTDP said: Pawanaal yetta vachaado attey vacchindhi Congress kuda . Nagbab gadu Lolsena party kadha... so there was relevancy. Now tell your relevancy... Quote
JaiTDP Posted May 20, 2020 Report Posted May 20, 2020 3 minutes ago, reality said: Nagbab gadu Lolsena party kadha... so there was relevancy. Now tell your relevancy... so Pawanaal 3 margs chesukunnadani - Lolsena party mottham 3 chesukotaanni samardhisthunnatla ? my relevancy is simple - Gandhi/Congress vidadheeyaraani bandham, kaadhantaava ? And if there is no Gandhi, there is no Congress - Simple. And the case was filed by congress party ppl Quote
reality Posted May 20, 2020 Report Posted May 20, 2020 Just now, JaiTDP said: so Pawanaal 3 margs chesukunnadani - Lolsena party mottham 3 chesukotaanni samardhisthunnatla ? Snake bob gadu oka party ni represent chesthunnappudu.. adhi obviously deemed as party stand... on marriages, yes if he gives a press statement saying 3 marriages is good for Matta..sort of... Quote
odhu_le_macha Posted May 20, 2020 Report Posted May 20, 2020 3 hours ago, Anta Assamey said: The Hyderabad police registered a complaint against actor and Jana Sena Party leader Konidela Naga Babu, younger brother of megastar Chiranjeevi, for praising Nathuram Godse, who had assassinated Mahata Gandhi in January 1948. The complaint was lodged by Telangana Pradesh Congress Committee general secretary Koduri Manavatha Roy with Osmania University police station on Wednesday. The police are yet to register an FIR. Roy alleged that Naga Babu had described Godse as a real patriot and the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi was a “debatable issue.” “Naga Babu had insulted the entire nation with his utterances,” the Congress leader said. While recalling the “glorious services” rendered by Nathuram Godse, Naga Babu tweeted on Tuesday praising Godse for doing what he had wanted to do. “Knowing fully well that he would have face public wrath if he killed Gandhi, Nathuram had done what he wanted to do. One cannot question his patriotism. He is a true patriot. I felt like recalling his glorious services once on his birthday. Poor Nathuram Godse. May his soul rest in peace,” Naga Babu tweeted. He blamed even the media for not projecting Godse’s point of view as it acted only in tune with the thinking of the then government. Congress musali nakka Quote
JaiTDP Posted May 20, 2020 Report Posted May 20, 2020 5 minutes ago, reality said: Snake bob gadu oka party ni represent chesthunnappudu.. adhi obviously deemed as party stand... on marriages, yes if he gives a press statement saying 3 marriages is good for Matta..sort of... U missed the whole point - NB expressed his personal opinion where as a case was filed by the party "Congress". so bringing Pawanaal/Modi is irrelevant here - still for the sake of crying on them, if u want to bring it, no point of disco. Quote
Silverado Posted May 20, 2020 Report Posted May 20, 2020 1 minute ago, JaiTDP said: U missed the whole point - NB expressed his personal opinion where as a case was filed by the party "Congress". so bringing Pawanaal/Modi is irrelevant here - still for the sake of crying on them, if u want to bring it, no point of disco. No need this explanation bro Let them bring truth should be out Why gandhi supported khilafat movement but not Hindutva movement 2 Quote
SinNombr3 Posted May 20, 2020 Report Posted May 20, 2020 18 minutes ago, JaiTDP said: U missed the whole point - NB expressed his personal opinion where as a case was filed by the party "Congress". so bringing Pawanaal/Modi is irrelevant here - still for the sake of crying on them, if u want to bring it, no point of disco. Please no logics.. 1 Quote
DummyVariable Posted May 20, 2020 Report Posted May 20, 2020 37 minutes ago, Silverado said: I don't think so INA only taking tactical support and military equipment,no military from them So after winning India ,INA will friendly ally to Japan not an invaded territory Ok, but what bothers me is sentences like these..why bring in the Nippon Army into everything baa? “If any person fails to understand the intentions of the Provisional Government of Azad Hind and the Indian National Army, or of our Ally, the Nippon Army, and dares to commit such acts as are itemized hereunder which would hamper the sacred task of emancipating India, he shall be executed or severely punished in accordance with the Criminal Law of the Provisional Government of Azad Hind and the Indian National Army or with the Martial Law of the Nippon Army.” He was more leftist than Nehru and wanted 20 years of dictatorship in India. Would it be okay if we had 20 years of rule under Netaji/Nippon Army? I agree with the general sentiment that Nehru may have had personal vendetta against him and it was cruel to not pay pensions to INA members after our independence, but that is a different discussion. Quote
Silverado Posted May 20, 2020 Report Posted May 20, 2020 9 minutes ago, DummyVariable said: Ok, but what bothers me is sentences like these..why bring in the Nippon Army into everything baa? “If any person fails to understand the intentions of the Provisional Government of Azad Hind and the Indian National Army, or of our Ally, the Nippon Army, and dares to commit such acts as are itemized hereunder which would hamper the sacred task of emancipating India, he shall be executed or severely punished in accordance with the Criminal Law of the Provisional Government of Azad Hind and the Indian National Army or with the Martial Law of the Nippon Army.” He was more leftist than Nehru and wanted 20 years of dictatorship in India. Would it be okay if we had 20 years of rule under Netaji/Nippon Army? I agree with the general sentiment that Nehru may have had personal vendetta against him and it was cruel to not pay pensions to INA members after our independence, but that is a different discussion. Avi anni namesake statements baa to satisfy Japanese nothing else Bose was not a fool ICS officer he know how to deal with japanese Quote
reality Posted May 20, 2020 Report Posted May 20, 2020 48 minutes ago, JaiTDP said: U missed the whole point - NB expressed his personal opinion where as a case was filed by the party "Congress". so bringing Pawanaal/Modi is irrelevant here - still for the sake of crying on them, if u want to bring it, no point of disco. Chi deenemma... chivarki Pawala gadi meeda no snake bab gadi meedano edche stage ki digajaraledhu... illiterates vallani mosthunnattu ... 1 Quote
DummyVariable Posted May 20, 2020 Report Posted May 20, 2020 1 hour ago, Silverado said: Avi anni namesake statements baa to satisfy Japanese nothing else Bose was not a fool ICS officer he know how to deal with japanese Cool. Ilanti plans unnayani theliyadu baa naaku. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.