Dippindots Posted August 11, 2020 Report Posted August 11, 2020 That holds true only for Ancestral property that's inherited. If it's father's hard earned money, then it's upon his interests whom he wants to give his money. Kids ki ivvalani kuda ledhu Quote
syra Posted August 11, 2020 Report Posted August 11, 2020 18 minutes ago, Printcopyscan said: అన్న గారు యెప్పుడో ఇచ్చారు ఈ హక్కు Vadu pettina daridramee edhii anthaa....votes kosam eesalu eesadu....marii LP ki kodukulatho patu equal share ichadaa.... Quote
Spartan Posted August 11, 2020 Report Posted August 11, 2020 27 minutes ago, AndhraneedSCS said: Ippudu oka 5 generations back people mee parents ni sue chesi maa ancestors ki equal rights ivvaledu ante .. emi cheyyali? I think this will open a can of worms 5 gens vellaru...read this.. The judgement is crucial as it sets aside a clutch of previous decisions by the Supreme Court that said daughters can have coparcenary right only if both the father and the daughter were alive as on September 9, 2005, when the amendment was notified, Quote
Spartan Posted August 11, 2020 Report Posted August 11, 2020 This ruling is only for the Properties where Will was not written.. in case Fathers and Grand Fathers clear cut ga Will raaste...evaru emi peekaleru... to avoid the cases where there is no will in place, this act will come into picture... Quote
Ento Posted August 11, 2020 Report Posted August 11, 2020 8 minutes ago, Spartan said: This ruling is only for the Properties where Will was not written.. in case Fathers and Grand Fathers clear cut ga Will raaste...evaru emi peekaleru... to avoid the cases where there is no will in place, this act will come into picture... I hope this is true. Quote
Kootami Posted August 11, 2020 Report Posted August 11, 2020 12 minutes ago, Spartan said: 5 gens vellaru...read this.. The judgement is crucial as it sets aside a clutch of previous decisions by the Supreme Court that said daughters can have coparcenary right only if both the father and the daughter were alive as on September 9, 2005, when the amendment was notified, Wow this will rules out half of my problems with ancestral properties Quote
AndhraneedSCS Posted August 11, 2020 Report Posted August 11, 2020 14 minutes ago, Spartan said: 5 gens vellaru...read this.. The judgement is crucial as it sets aside a clutch of previous decisions by the Supreme Court that said daughters can have coparcenary right only if both the father and the daughter were alive as on September 9, 2005, when the amendment was notified, Complete sentence chadivava? Quote
reddyeee Posted August 11, 2020 Report Posted August 11, 2020 1 hour ago, Ento said: And what happens if son’s money was used to purchase property that is on fathers name Prove cheyyagaligithe court lo fight chese chance vundhi. Prove cheyyalekapothe then father hard work tho earn chesi property konnatlu lekka so he can give to anyone that he wish 1 hour ago, Ento said: Agricultural land nri peru medha register chepiyocha? I was told ‘No’ Yes, you can do that and good thing is that you dont have to be in india to finish the registration Quote
Spartan Posted August 11, 2020 Report Posted August 11, 2020 8 minutes ago, AndhraneedSCS said: Complete sentence chadivava? u mean antak mundu ichina rulings malli court ki vastayantava...pre-sep 2005 vi Quote
AndhraneedSCS Posted August 11, 2020 Report Posted August 11, 2020 5 hours ago, Spartan said: u mean antak mundu ichina rulings malli court ki vastayantava...pre-sep 2005 vi nevermind. I think you are right. I read the full article Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.