1 hour ago, Catalpha said:

I have a doubt about ancient Hindu scriptures. I think we should look at Ramayana as a novel, rather than a sacred book. So, based on this novel, I am trying to understand why people call Seeta as a Goddess. From what I understand, Seeta is an incredibly beautiful woman, who was loyal to her husband even in the face of adversity. Is that all it takes to be a Goddess, to sit around and look pretty, and be loyal to your husband? What did Seeta do that other princess haven't done? Is it because she had to separate from her husband for 13 or so years? Or is it because she left to the forest with her husband? Why is she a Goddess? I am trying to understand the character arc of Seeta, so don't bring any butthurt comments about religion. 

Edchinattu undhi nee bokkalo observation ... 

assal Nuvvu ramayanam chadhivava mundhu ?

chadhivi... ardham cheskoni ... ardham kanivi pandithulatho clarify cheskoni apudu matladu

1 minute ago, VenkyBabu said:

Edchinattu undhi nee bokkalo observation ... 

assal Nuvvu ramayanam chadhivava mundhu ?

chadhivi... ardham cheskoni ... ardham kanivi pandithulatho clarify cheskoni apudu matladu

nuvvu quran sadavakundaney anni telisinattu mhd ayesha antaav ga. andaru anthey.

4 minutes ago, chanchala said:

nuvvu quran sadavakundaney anni telisinattu mhd ayesha antaav ga. andaru anthey.

Hi utter bro ... ela unnav ? 
 

10 minutes ago, Catalpha said:

It's true, I guess it was retrogressive to a certain extent and didn't age well. 

its a story. those who believe its history are dumbfcuks. most of these stories were written around 500bc, and were passed down for 100s of yrs before that orally.

they became gods in the 10th century onwards may be. until then, they were just stories

She listened to her husband and followed him without any counter arguments, and no feminism & equality fights from her. anduke ame goddess aindi.

 

Just now, ChinnaBhasha said:

She listened to her husband and followed him without any counter arguments, and no feminism & equality fights from her. anduke ame goddess aindi.

 

Just now, Dippindots said:

Just now, ChinnaBhasha said:

She listened to her husband and followed him without any counter arguments, and no feminism & equality fights from her. anduke ame goddess aindi.

 

depending on the narrator, Sita's story changes. in a lot of stories, she comes across as a strong woman who challenged her husband, kept a monster at bay, and not a damsel in distress.

25 minutes ago, Dippindots said:

The one who goes by books and thinks should do the right thing , suffers the most

Let the truth triumph

Just now, sharenshare said:

Let the truth triumph

Let the Demons dance

I have a theory that Ramayana, Mahabharata were written for an essay competition in Sanskrit. they compiled all the best stories and wove it into a grand narrative. hehee...

 

24 minutes ago, Catalpha said:

Why is Seeta a Goddess? Because she is a devoted wife? A lot of people are. 

What do you think? If you seem to have no clue which seems to be the case, please consider reading before drawing to baseless conclusions 

7 minutes ago, chanchala said:

its a story. those who believe its history are dumbfcuks. most of these stories were written around 500bc, and were passed down for 100s of yrs before that orally.

they became gods in the 10th century onwards may be. until then, they were just stories

Lol 😂 adi shankaracharya was born in around 4th century ... by that time itself there’s a temple in tirumala . He visited that 

he penned many strotras on Vishnu & lakshmi. 
 

3 minutes ago, chanchala said:

depending on the narrator, Sita's story changes. in a lot of stories, she comes across as a strong woman who challenged her husband, kept a monster at bay, and not a damsel in distress.

will that qualify for being called as goddess ani @Catalpha asking.. in that case eeroju nundi husband ni challenge emundi, avsaramite urikinchi kodta ani @Catalpha db ki challenge throwing

1 minute ago, VenkyBabu said:

Lol 😂 adi shankaracharya was born in around 4th century ... by that time itself there’s a temple in tirumala . He visited that 

he penned many strotras on Vishnu & lakshmi. 
 

Who says Tirumala was a vaishnavaite center then? let the pujaris allow for the idol in tirumala to be examined to verify its authenticity

shankaracharya wrote on vishnu aa? are you trying to troll me or something?